AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > McIntosh Audio

McIntosh Audio A Tradition of Excellence

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-12-2018, 03:20 PM
John Clark John Clark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 65
Default Your Thoughts - Best Sounding Mac Integrated Pre MA8000?

I was originally considering purchasing a McIntosh power amp for my office/den system, but was convinced, here and elsewhere that an integrated made more sense.

I would appreciate your thoughts on what you have owned, or have significant experience with, that you consider to be the best sounding Mac integrated prior to the MA8000. While I love the look of the 8000, I simply do not need that kind of power, nor do I need an included DAC. I also have no need for a phono stage, for that matter, but that's probably a moot point. For this discussion, lets limit things, because I don't want to go TOO far back in time, to the MA6600 through the MA7900.

I started out considering an MA7000 as the option I might like best, and again, it has the newer look that I really like, but this post really made me reconsider things a bit:

05-23-2012, 10:24 AM
MrAcoustat's Avatar
MrAcoustat MrAcoustat is offline
MrAcoustat

Join Date: May 2012
Location: Quebec Canada
Posts: 145
Default
Quote:

"If you want something good at a reasonable price may i suggest this one it won a weekend showdown against a McIntosh MA-7000 even if it is almost $3,000.00 cheaper yes whe where three audiophiles in that showdown and the verdict was anonymous this little gem was the Classé CAP-2100 great little integrated amplifier."


Any input, recommendations and expertise would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

John
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-12-2018, 03:24 PM
62caddy's Avatar
62caddy 62caddy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,069
Default

As Classe' has gone out of business, parts and service down the road could be problematic so this should be considered.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-13-2018, 12:59 AM
John Clark John Clark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 65
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 62caddy View Post
As Classe' has gone out of business, parts and service down the road could be problematic so this should be considered.
Understood, and this question was never about Classe. I was hoping those amongst the McIntosh ownership could offer me valuable opinions of thoughts regarding their integrated amps.

John
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-13-2018, 08:52 AM
BuffaloBill BuffaloBill is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,247
Default

You ruled out what I thought was the logical answer.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-13-2018, 12:35 PM
62caddy's Avatar
62caddy 62caddy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,069
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Clark View Post
Understood, and this question was never about Classe. I was hoping those amongst the McIntosh ownership could offer me valuable opinions of thoughts regarding their integrated amps.

John
My apologies if I misinterpreted the question.

For whatever its worth and with all due respect to the aforementioned comments, I would take that with a grain of salt not knowing how the comparison was staged, conducted and whether or not the units had been properly tested prior to comparative evaluation.

Otherwise the MA7000 is 250 wpc into 2, 4 and 8 ohm; the Classe' is 100 wpc into 8 ohms; 200 wpc into 4 with no 2 ohm rating provided which likely means it lacks the current ability to safely do so. Signal to noise ratio is at least 10 dB better in the Mac which is significant.

Objectively speaking there is really no comparison concerning the capabilities of the respective units and clearly the Mac has greater flexibility regarding the range of speakers that may be used with it and is designed for cool operation, exceptional longevity & reliability in the McIntosh tradition.

Perhaps the listeners found the slightly higher noise of the Classe' to be pleasing. It would not be the first time such a thing has happened.

Last edited by 62caddy; 08-13-2018 at 12:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-13-2018, 12:44 PM
John Clark John Clark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 65
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 62caddy View Post
My apologies if I misinterpreted the question.

For whatever its worth and with all due respect to the aforementioned comments, I would take that with a grain of salt not knowing how the comparison was staged, conducted and whether or not the units had been properly tested prior to comparative evaluation.

Otherwise the MA7000 is 250 wpc into 2, 4 and 8 ohm; the Classe' is 100 wpc into 8 ohms; 200 wpc into 4 with no 2 ohm rating provided which likely means it lacks the current ability to safely do so. Signal to noise ratio is at least 10 dB better in the Mac which is significant.

Objectively speaking there is really no comparison concerning the capabilities of the respective units and clearly the Mac has greater flexibility regarding the range of speakers that may be used with it and is designed for cool operation, exceptional longevity & reliability and in the McIntosh tradition.

Perhaps the listeners found the slightly higher noise of the Classe' to be pleasing. It would not be the first time such a thing has happened.


Al good points on that comparison. Far too few facts for it to be completely meaningful. So, on to the McIntosh integrated amps. Please let me know your thoughts.

John
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-13-2018, 01:03 PM
62caddy's Avatar
62caddy 62caddy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,069
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Clark View Post
Al good points on that comparison. Far too few facts for it to be completely meaningful. So, on to the McIntosh integrated amps. Please let me know your thoughts.

John
Personally my vote stands for the MA7000 mainly because the added flexibility of the EQ and more importantly because it is not firmware controlled. I'm quite confident this will be viewed as a significant advantage in the secondary market over comparable McIntosh equipment reliant on firmware as failures related to these operating systems become more widely known.

As important as performance is, there are other factors that merit equally serious consideration. You get the best of both with the MA7000 - in my view, FWIW.

Last edited by 62caddy; 08-13-2018 at 02:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-13-2018, 03:09 PM
John Clark John Clark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 65
Default

Yes, I'm starting to lean towards the MA7000 too. It's everything I need, and as noted before, I love the look. Unfortunately, they don't seem to come up for sale too often!

John
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-13-2018, 03:22 PM
jdandy's Avatar
jdandy jdandy is offline
Merry Christmas to all



 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 53,224
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 62caddy View Post
Personally my vote stands for the MA7000 mainly because the added flexibility of the EQ and more importantly because it is not firmware controlled. I'm quite confident this will be viewed as a significant advantage in the secondary market over comparable McIntosh equipment reliant on firmware as failures related to these operating systems become more widely known.

As important as performance is, there are other factors that merit equally serious consideration. You get the best of both with the MA7000 - in my view, FWIW.
Eric.......Sage advice. .
__________________
Dan



STUDIO - McIntosh C1000C/P, MC2301 (2), MR88, Aurender N10, Esoteric K-01X, Shunyata Sigma spdif digital cable, Sonos Connect, PurePower 2000, Stillpoints, Furutech Flux 50, Michell Gyro SE, Michell HR Power Supply, SME 309, Ortofon Cadenza Black, Wireworld, Sonus faber Amati Anniversario
LIVING ROOM - McIntosh C2300, MC75 (2), MR85, Magnum Dynalab 205, Simaudio MOON Neo 260D-T, Schiit Audio Yggdrasil, Aurender N100H, Shunyata Sigma USB cable, Micro Seiki DD40, Ortofon Cadenza Blue, Nakamichi BX-300, Sony 60ES DAT, PS Audio P10, Furutech Flux 50, Sonos Connect, Stillpoints, Wireworld, Kimber, PMC EB1i, JL Audio f113
VINTAGE - McIntosh MA230, Tandberg 3011A tuner, Olive 04HD, Sony DTC-59ES DAT, McIntosh 4300V, JBL 4312A
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-13-2018, 05:16 PM
MORTIS's Avatar
MORTIS MORTIS is offline
Alien Member

 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 399
Default

John: I have the MA7000, the last fully analogue integrated from McIntosh, and to me it sounds wonderful. Although I've been in to high end home audio for over 40 years, I've not had many McIntosh components to compare.

If you're interested, here is my review of it: http://audioaficionado.org/showthread.php?t=37620
__________________
https://photos.smugmug.com/Family/Online-Images/n-cSsHr/i-CbqdrFQ/0/9501fef1/O/i-CbqdrFQ.jpg

Lossless > D100 / Yami YP 450 tt > MA7000 > KEF RDM3 / SVS SB2000 / Too much music, not enough time.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:41 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video