AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > Audio Research

Audio Research State of the Art Audio Reproduction

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-05-2020, 02:39 PM
djcxxx djcxxx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 216
Default ARC/DAW system impressions

I completed the transition to the latest SE components with an ARC upgrade of my CD9 to CD9SE. I acquired the 6SE in May and the 3SE in July. The DAW’s have been in since February. Couple of minor QA negatives from ARC. The 160S meters started behaving erratically and to ARC’s credit a new “160B” was substituted with meters sourced from a new supplier. Of course I was willing to have my unit fixed with new meters but that may not be possible. The new meters do not illuminate symmetrically, but that’s not worth pursuing. I have doubts about the longevity of these meters and the new ARC management may as well. My Phono 3SE was delivered, out of the box, with one channel on input 1 inoperative despite a QC card stating otherwise. The CD9SE, unlike my Ref Phono 2SE upgrade, was delivered without a new QC card or manual. Small things to be sure, but unlike any ARC experience I’ve had over a 40 year history with ARC.
Sonically the Ref 6SE is quite a departure from my 5SE and synergies much better with the 160S. Soundstage is more detailed and less recessed, but somewhat less warm than 5SE/75SE combination. Another interpretation would be more accurate. I do not listen in ultralinear mode so no comment. The 3SE has not delivered a “eureka” moment over the 2SE. In fact I cannot distinguish the difference which may be a limitation of my vinyl rig. The CD9SE actually sounds marginally better than the CD9, better imaging, clarity. Possibly new tubes are the answer to that. As an aside, the Wilson’s are truly superb in all parameters except the lowest registers of bass. They are the stars in my system. At this point I would have to say that while ARC gear remains a good value (compared to next price level gear), I have some concerns regarding the QC and longevity of current models. New management and time will tell.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg D9E7A1EB-A48D-4F2F-BC1F-D4203F6A549B.jpeg (1.49 MB, 187 views)
File Type: jpeg 8F5319CB-5890-4CC0-9AC4-E5A387E81462.jpeg (2.19 MB, 212 views)
__________________
Wilson Alexia V; ARC Ref 6SE; ARC Ref Phono 3SE; Boulder 1160; Esoteric K1X; Artisan Fidelity Garrard 301 Statement; Ikeda 407; Koetsu Leopard, Coralstone; Shunyata Denali 6000T; Shunyata AC cables; Siltech Prince speaker cables; Siltech Princess interconnects, Avondale II phono.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-05-2020, 11:45 PM
2fastdriving 2fastdriving is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,772
Default

Looking great! Congrats on some fantastic gear. I know how good ARC and Wilson pair. Let's see a pic of the whole system!

Ps. Make sure you are using the 8 ohm tap...

And like you, I'll be watching to see what changes are in store for the company.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-06-2020, 11:36 PM
lem321 lem321 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 139
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djcxxx View Post
I completed the transition to the latest SE components with an ARC upgrade of my CD9 to CD9SE. I acquired the 6SE in May and the 3SE in July. The DAW’s have been in since February. Couple of minor QA negatives from ARC. The 160S meters started behaving erratically and to ARC’s credit a new “160B” was substituted with meters sourced from a new supplier. Of course I was willing to have my unit fixed with new meters but that may not be possible. The new meters do not illuminate symmetrically, but that’s not worth pursuing. I have doubts about the longevity of these meters and the new ARC management may as well. My Phono 3SE was delivered, out of the box, with one channel on input 1 inoperative despite a QC card stating otherwise. The CD9SE, unlike my Ref Phono 2SE upgrade, was delivered without a new QC card or manual. Small things to be sure, but unlike any ARC experience I’ve had over a 40 year history with ARC.
Sonically the Ref 6SE is quite a departure from my 5SE and synergies much better with the 160S. Soundstage is more detailed and less recessed, but somewhat less warm than 5SE/75SE combination. Another interpretation would be more accurate. I do not listen in ultralinear mode so no comment. The 3SE has not delivered a “eureka” moment over the 2SE. In fact I cannot distinguish the difference which may be a limitation of my vinyl rig. The CD9SE actually sounds marginally better than the CD9, better imaging, clarity. Possibly new tubes are the answer to that. As an aside, the Wilson’s are truly superb in all parameters except the lowest registers of bass. They are the stars in my system. At this point I would have to say that while ARC gear remains a good value (compared to next price level gear), I have some concerns regarding the QC and longevity of current models. New management and time will tell.
Thanks for relating your recent experiences with ARC and your SE updates. I have almost the same equipment having recently completed a factory upgrade of the Ref 6 and Phono 3 to SE status. I also have the ARC CD9, 250SE and Wilson Sashas. I only recently found out about the availability of the SE upgrade for the CD9 and didn't think it would improve the CD playback until I read your comments...new tubes maybe? I'm considering it just for the cool looks and the added flexibility if I ever start streaming.

Some of your experiences with ARC QC sounds unusual although I've also heard about problems with their "ghost" meters. I've generally been very pleased with ARC's QC and service, although the few times there've been hiccups, they always make it right. Your impressions of the new SE components are spot on with my own. The 6SE is much better than the 5SE in the way you describe but the phono stage, not so much.

A question: your rack is very neat but it looks like there is fairly minimal space around the components especially the Ref 6SE. Aren't you concerned about ventilation?

Again, thanks for sharing.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-06-2020, 11:41 PM
joey_v joey_v is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 2,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lem321 View Post
A question: your rack is very neat but it looks like there is fairly minimal space around the components especially the Ref 6SE. Aren't you concerned about ventilation?

Again, thanks for sharing.
You're right, after pointing that out, I looked at the photos again and noted that it does appear to be pretty tight/snug. Ventilation might be an issue.

What kind of rack is that?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-07-2020, 10:54 AM
lem321 lem321 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 139
Default

Zoethecus?
__________________
Wilson DAW, ARC 160M Mk 2, 250SE, Ref 6SE, Ref 3SE, CD9SE, VPI TNT6 w/rim drive, 12" Fatboy/3D/12.7, LP1 clamp, Lyra Etna Lambda SL, Kleos, Koetsu Onyx, Vermillion, U Gold, TA Gen 5 Reference cables, Shunyata Triton 2/Typhon, 2000T, Alpha PCs, Furutech NCF on 3 dedicated lines. Home Theater: Stewart 123" Firehawk, JVC RS-500, Panasonic 4K player, Marantz 8802a, Wilson Center3+surrounds, GoldenEar HTR7000, JL f113, Parasound A51 and Krell 250a/3.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-08-2020, 10:03 AM
djcxxx djcxxx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 216
Default

Yes it is a Zoethecus with “Z slabs” I purchased new from them in 02 or 03. Sadly they went under but I’ve yet to find a stand as good that wasn’t stratospheric in price. It is a little tight up front but there is a couple of inches above and below the 6SE and 3SE. Here is a photo of the entire set up.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg AA8F69A0-0BF5-4348-B95B-2DE57D8D20A1.jpeg (1.71 MB, 121 views)
__________________
Wilson Alexia V; ARC Ref 6SE; ARC Ref Phono 3SE; Boulder 1160; Esoteric K1X; Artisan Fidelity Garrard 301 Statement; Ikeda 407; Koetsu Leopard, Coralstone; Shunyata Denali 6000T; Shunyata AC cables; Siltech Prince speaker cables; Siltech Princess interconnects, Avondale II phono.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-08-2020, 01:28 PM
2fastdriving 2fastdriving is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,772
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djcxxx View Post
Yes it is a Zoethecus with “Z slabs” I purchased new from them in 02 or 03. Sadly they went under but I’ve yet to find a stand as good that wasn’t stratospheric in price. It is a little tight up front but there is a couple of inches above and below the 6SE and 3SE. Here is a photo of the entire set up.
Thanks for showing the whole rig. Very nice! Congrats on a well thought out system.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-09-2020, 03:19 PM
lem321 lem321 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 139
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djcxxx View Post
Yes it is a Zoethecus with “Z slabs” I purchased new from them in 02 or 03. Sadly they went under but I’ve yet to find a stand as good that wasn’t stratospheric in price. It is a little tight up front but there is a couple of inches above and below the 6SE and 3SE. Here is a photo of the entire set up.
Very neat and tidy system. Awesome. Thanks for sharing your experiences and pictures.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-11-2020, 05:06 PM
jpspock jpspock is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Brussels
Posts: 220
Default

Great setup and thx for sharing. DAW is an exceptional speaker. I am just surprised about your comment for low frequencies. Normally, it’ si very deep, detailed and fast, so for sure you need to search where you can improve your system because the problem doesn’t come from thé DAW ..
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-12-2020, 09:32 AM
djcxxx djcxxx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 216
Default

The DAW does not extend as low in the bass as the Alexia 2 which I auditioned as well, and the difference is easily appreciated. The bass of my DAW is limited by positioning needs.
__________________
Wilson Alexia V; ARC Ref 6SE; ARC Ref Phono 3SE; Boulder 1160; Esoteric K1X; Artisan Fidelity Garrard 301 Statement; Ikeda 407; Koetsu Leopard, Coralstone; Shunyata Denali 6000T; Shunyata AC cables; Siltech Prince speaker cables; Siltech Princess interconnects, Avondale II phono.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:12 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video