AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > Audio Research

Audio Research State of the Art Audio Reproduction

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-18-2013, 03:04 AM
taters taters is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Banter View Post
I went with a friend to audition a Cary System – SLP 03 Tube Preamplifier and SA-200.2 Amplifier.
I was immediately impressed with great dynamics, punchy and impactful. I liked the sound coming from it better than what my ARC-Ref150 and Ref5se combo was giving me.
After we left the dealer I immediately went to ARC house of worship and got down on my knees and said “ O god when will my salvation come. For last six months I have played this ARC combo till the Plexiglas cover on the Pre nearly melted and had to be replaced by metal. I wore out the plastic remote and had to be replaced by metal. All these months the whole house smelt of tar from Ref150 transformers.”
The voice from the sky said “You are not worthy of owning these ARC gear - you do not have the patience. You expect too much only after 250 hours. Get of this Sonic Cliff - Sell it!”
I went back to the Cary dealer and borrowed the two pieces. Took them home. The minute I plugged them in, same great sound came. While I waited good 20 minutes for the ARC gear to warm up to give me close but different sound. Cary hit the ground running. Wife and I both enjoyed listening to Cary.
So if you are in Toronto area I am getting off this Sonic Cliff. Sold!
So you are saying that an amp and pre-amp from Cary that lists for 6400.00 blew away an ARC setup that cost 26,000. If that's the case I can't see why anyone would buy ARC.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-18-2013, 04:00 AM
bzr bzr is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Hunter Valley Australia.
Posts: 2,492
Default

taters, do you own ARC gear, or is it a general observation?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-18-2013, 05:11 AM
taters taters is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bzr View Post
taters, do you own ARC gear, or is it a general observation?
I own ARC gear. But I'm not going to lie, If I could buy Cary at a quarter of the price and it sounds better I would sell my ARC gear in a New York minute. The big question is does it really sound better.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-19-2013, 01:32 AM
jpgr4blu jpgr4blu is offline
Member

 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: new york city
Posts: 548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taters View Post
I own ARC gear. But I'm not going to lie, If I could buy Cary at a quarter of the price and it sounds better I would sell my ARC gear in a New York minute. The big question is does it really sound better.
I have heard many Cary components over the years including amps, preamps and cd players. IMHO you should not go out of your way to hear it. Not bad, and sometimes pretty good if not very good for the money, but certainly not in the same league as ARC Ref gear.
__________________
Wilson Alexia V, ARC Ref 160M MkII,Ref 40,Ref Phono2SE, Shunyata Triton3, Typhon, Sigma PCs, ICs & SCs, Spectral SDR4000SV (w MIT IC), Belcanto PL1, Oppo 205, Marantz 2270 (tuner only):AudioDesk and VPI record cleaners, Furutech Demag & Destat; Stillpoint Apertures, TechDas AF 3S Premium with SAT CF9 and Kuzma 4pt 9" arms, Lyra Atlas Lambda SL, Dynavector XV1-t stereo and XV1-s mono carts, Miyajima mono, Shure V15VxMR,
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-19-2013, 02:54 AM
Alki's Avatar
Alki Alki is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 938
Default

I would think that some dedicated ARC owners would agree that it would have been nice to have a better remote all the way along and possibly even different material for the top of the preamps. That being said it's the audio Nirvana in the end that counts and not let a couple small cosmetic issues effect your decision.

Everybody has different ears and also different aspirations of what they thrive for in their quest for perfect sounds reproduction . My experiences have found that even the ARC LS 27 sounded superior to me then the top offerings by Cary Audio. Not that I thought the Cary sound was awful (cause it was not) , just not in the same as ARC (especially the Ref Gear).

It is to bad you did not want to give ARC a fair chance as I believe you probably purchased this gear knowing that the sound would be amazing.

Good luck with your new gear.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-19-2013, 03:47 AM
turntable's Avatar
turntable turntable is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Downunder in Sydney
Posts: 1,774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taters View Post
I own ARC gear. But I'm not going to lie, If I could buy Cary at a quarter of the price and it sounds better I would sell my ARC gear in a New York minute. The big question is does it really sound better.
Go out and have a listen.

Elberoth owns the Cary amp with Sasha's and in his system it sounded better than a few more expensive amps, including a highly touted 40k pair of Mono's.

I used to own the SLP98 and that was a superb sounding pre amp - I preferred it at the time to my expensive VTL 7.5 which I duly sold. It had really nice pace, rythym, attack and timing from memory.


Cheers

Last edited by turntable; 01-19-2013 at 04:35 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-21-2013, 01:17 AM
Banter's Avatar
Banter Banter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ontario
Posts: 271
Default Decision not taken lightly…..adult content.

Wife could not stand the fumes from those transformers in Ref150. After a lot of complaints from her, I consulted the lawyer. He recommended that it would be cheaper to get rid of the AMP.



It is now with a fellow forumer here.



I am still hanging on to the Ref5se. There are days when the mirage looks nice and clear and then it gets hazy. I am hoping someday I will reach my oases.




On the art of burn in – I never felt comfortable leaving these tube gears on for more than 5 hours. I never left them on and when I was not around. I have seen fireworks on an Air Tight tube amp. You do not want to leave these on and go away. Thought I must admit, Ref150 ran cooler with the fans than the Ref5se.
If and when Ref5se settles down, I will start considering Ref.75. My volume meter rarely goes over 5. I do not need a lot of power
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-22-2013, 10:46 AM
Dafos Dafos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: 14' N
Posts: 342
Default

Banter, I've owned lots of audio research amps and if the the trannies in your amp emitted noxious smelling "fumes" then something must have been wrong with them. In another thread I believe you stated you had sellers remorse? Whatever has been said about break in, if you didn't like the sound and felt it was clearly inferior to Cary at 250 hours, then I don't think the situation would have changed after 600. So Im now wondering why your now considering a ref 75.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-22-2013, 12:41 PM
SundayNiagara SundayNiagara is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 283
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dafos View Post
Banter, I've owned lots of audio research amps and if the the trannies in your amp emitted noxious smelling "fumes" then something must have been wrong with them. In another thread I believe you stated you had sellers remorse? Whatever has been said about break in, if you didn't like the sound and felt it was clearly inferior to Cary at 250 hours, then I don't think the situation would have changed after 600. So Im now wondering why your now considering a ref 75.
Yes, very interesting!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:34 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video