#131
|
|||
|
|||
So I didn't listen to individual pieces since if I do change I want to do the stack. Also it was virtually a day doing the demo, so of I attempted to do the individual comparisons it would have taken considerably longer.
The three boxes were pretty incredible. Oh and they actually look like a reference system whereas the Scarlatti isn't quite the same! M.
__________________
ARC Ref150, Ref40, DCS Scarlatti, ML CLX, ML Descent I * 2, Transparent MM2 cables |
#132
|
|||
|
|||
Had the Vivaldi in my system last week. DAC, clock and upsampler. Not interested in disks these days.
Compared to Scarlatti, images were more solid. Connecting my rubidium reference clock made them even better. Am I buying it? You bet! |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
Hello Custodian,
Any more differences between the Vivaldi and Scarlatti? Thanks, |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
That is a fantastic digital front end. Congrats!
__________________
Mike |
#135
|
|||
|
|||
Have to admit it was by far the best digital replay I have ever heard!
M.
__________________
ARC Ref150, Ref40, DCS Scarlatti, ML CLX, ML Descent I * 2, Transparent MM2 cables |
#136
|
|||
|
|||
Not really. Detail sounded similar. It was simply that images sounded more solid and more real.
|
|
|
Audio Aficionado Sponsors | |