AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > Audio Research

Audio Research State of the Art Audio Reproduction

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 01-14-2015, 12:38 PM
Bobvin Bobvin is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Portland, OR area
Posts: 124
Default

Hi Max do you have REF750s? You are a most fortunate audiophile. You know of course that each chassis takes 16 tubes. I don't even know how one would say "a matched sixteenplet", times two of course for 32 KT150s. In this scenario having carefully matched tubes would, I imagine, be ultra critical for ultimate performance. Having a single tube drift out of compliance would impact the the entire channel, and matching 16 (32) would require sorting through a very large sample set. Much easier to match up a quad than a sixteenplet.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 01-14-2015, 01:54 PM
MPS's Avatar
MPS MPS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Global
Posts: 163
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobvin View Post
Hi Max do you have REF750s? You are a most fortunate audiophile. You know of course that each chassis takes 16 tubes. I don't even know how one would say "a matched sixteenplet", times two of course for 32 KT150s. In this scenario having carefully matched tubes would, I imagine, be ultra critical for ultimate performance. Having a single tube drift out of compliance would impact the the entire channel, and matching 16 (32) would require sorting through a very large sample set. Much easier to match up a quad than a sixteenplet.
Not sure about REF750 but at least in VT200mkII matched quads are required. Tubes are being biased in groups of four, it's not necessary to match all 16.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 01-14-2015, 02:08 PM
max17 max17 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 20
Default

Actually I don't own REF750s (only the much more modest Ref150) however I only ask out of curiosity. When I purchased (8) KT150's for my amp I assumed they were basically matched as pairs. Each matched pair needs to have the ability to be biased within a certain range having only a single bias adjustment for the pair. I didn't think it mattered how closely each tube pair had to be matched in relation to another tube pair as long as each pair could ultimately be biased within the required range. I guess that is my question - Does each tube pair need to be closely matched to all other tube pairs in the amp?
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 01-14-2015, 02:14 PM
max17 max17 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 20
Default

MPS - thanks for the info on the VT200mkII. So I would then assume that the REF750s tubes would need to be biased in groups larger than 4 (maybe 8 or 16) which would make tube matching understandably very difficult.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 01-14-2015, 02:32 PM
max17 max17 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 20
Default

Looking at specs for each model of REF amp I now understand. REF75 includes individual biasing for each tube, REF150 and 250 are biased by tube pair, and the 750 is biased by tube quad.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 01-14-2015, 04:21 PM
Number95's Avatar
Number95 Number95 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobvin View Post
Hi Max do you have REF750s? You are a most fortunate audiophile. You know of course that each chassis takes 16 tubes. I don't even know how one would say "a matched sixteenplet", times two of course for 32 KT150s. In this scenario having carefully matched tubes would, I imagine, be ultra critical for ultimate performance. Having a single tube drift out of compliance would impact the the entire channel, and matching 16 (32) would require sorting through a very large sample set. Much easier to match up a quad than a sixteenplet.
Matching is required for 4 sets of 8 tubes for Ref750. There are two sets of 8 tubes per channel which one tube in each set is user controlled to the recommended bias setting. Yes matching 8 vs 4 is still harder work but no need for 16.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 03-04-2015, 12:00 PM
TONINO61 TONINO61 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2
Default

[IMG][/IMG]
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 03-13-2015, 01:49 PM
Felice Felice is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 12
Default

It's amazing how overwhelmed the the much to small power transformer even more power.
Such a small power transformer Europe is a no go!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:08 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video