AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > McIntosh Audio

McIntosh Audio A Tradition of Excellence

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-03-2018, 09:14 AM
Fido's Avatar
Fido Fido is offline
In the Wind!
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 83
Default C52 and MCD500 vs MCD1100

two questions please:

what are the improvements of C52 over C50?

Is the MCD1100 significantly better than the MCD500?

Thanks
__________________
McIntosh C50, MCD1100, Oppo BDP-105D, Bryston
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-03-2018, 12:25 PM
Charles Charles is online now
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,242
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fido View Post
two questions please:

what are the improvements of C52 over C50?

Is the MCD1100 significantly better than the MCD500?

Thanks
I can't specifically say about the C50 vs C52 except to say that the C52 appears to be a full function D1100. As such it has all the latest Mac technology in it. The C52 got a very positive review in TAS.

Regarding the MCD1100 vs the MCD500 there are significant differences. Sonically, I suspect they are similar but again I suspect the MCD1100 has better parts, i.e. fewer corners cut. Does this mean better sonics, impossible for me to say? I would say if pushed the differences would be minor.

However, the main difference is the inclusion of the DIN output with the MCD1100 as well as a digital coaxial and optical output. I own a MCD1100 and D1100. Using the DIN output I am able to play SACD's through my D1100 using the MCT input. The MCD500 has no DIN output so a digital SACD output does not exist. Sonically, I can conclusively state that the D1100 is superior to my MCD1100. The difference is significant. Easy to hear. Extrapolating, I suspect that buying a MCT450 and using the C52 as a fully decked out D1100 would yield truly superior results at a great price in terms of highend audio. Also tremendous flexibility not present with a D1100. However, for my tastes the C52 lacks an AES/EBU input which is what I prefer to use to listen to CD. However, I think the MCT input used for SACD is totally adequate for CD also. I do not regard this as a flaw in the C52 input menu. Summing it up, I think the MCT450/C52 combo to be the best buy in highend audio for the above reasons.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-03-2018, 04:32 PM
xv21 xv21 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 139
Default

McIntosh C52+D1100+MCT450 is better than C52+MCT450. You can hear the difference. I have not heard McIntosh MCD550. I would check McIntosh MCD550, because it is cheaper than D1100+MCT450.

Last edited by xv21; 05-03-2018 at 05:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-03-2018, 05:04 PM
jdandy's Avatar
jdandy jdandy is offline
Merry Christmas to all



 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 53,224
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fido View Post
Is the MCD1100 significantly better than the MCD500?
Fido.......My McIntosh MCD1100 Review may be helpful in answering your question.
__________________
Dan



STUDIO - McIntosh C1000C/P, MC2301 (2), MR88, Aurender N10, Esoteric K-01X, Shunyata Sigma spdif digital cable, Sonos Connect, PurePower 2000, Stillpoints, Furutech Flux 50, Michell Gyro SE, Michell HR Power Supply, SME 309, Ortofon Cadenza Black, Wireworld, Sonus faber Amati Anniversario
LIVING ROOM - McIntosh C2300, MC75 (2), MR85, Magnum Dynalab 205, Simaudio MOON Neo 260D-T, Schiit Audio Yggdrasil, Aurender N100H, Shunyata Sigma USB cable, Micro Seiki DD40, Ortofon Cadenza Blue, Nakamichi BX-300, Sony 60ES DAT, PS Audio P10, Furutech Flux 50, Sonos Connect, Stillpoints, Wireworld, Kimber, PMC EB1i, JL Audio f113
VINTAGE - McIntosh MA230, Tandberg 3011A tuner, Olive 04HD, Sony DTC-59ES DAT, McIntosh 4300V, JBL 4312A
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-03-2018, 07:22 PM
W9TR's Avatar
W9TR W9TR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The Neutral Zone
Posts: 4,665
Default C52 and MCD500 vs MCD1100

I have owned both the MCD 500 and the MCD 1100. The MCD 1100 is significantly better sonically. Wider soundstage, deeper soundstage, more accurate instrumental timbres, better rendering of the hall sound on orchestral music.

The one thing both players share is the crappy plastic McIntosh remote, a true abomination if there ever was one.

Tom
__________________
Main System:
Amati Futura Mains
Amati Homage VOX Center,
Proac Response 1sc Rears,
Three MC2301's for L,C,R
MC 602 for the rears
C 1100, MX 151, MCD 1100, MR 80
Nottingham Dais with Wave Mechanic
Sumiko Palo Santos Presentation

SurfacePro 3, RPi 4, ROON, WW Starlight Platinum USB, Schiit Yggdrasil, Benchmark DAC3 HGC

MX 151, OppO BDP-95, JVC RS-500 DILA projector, 106" diagonal Stewart Luxus Screenwall Deluxe with Studiotek 130 G3 material.

Lake House:
Ohm F, MC 275V, C2300, MR 77, Rega P3

OnDeck:
McIntosh MAC 4300v
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-03-2018, 07:47 PM
1KW 1KW is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Naples, Fl & Long Beach Island, NJ
Posts: 7,634
Default

Having owned a MCD500 for many years and a D1100 for nearly a year I can say you won't be disappointed with either . The D1100 is in a different league as it has USB input for hi resolution DSD 64,128 and 256 (SACD is DSD64) as well as hi resolution PCM files. The MCD500 does not have cheaper parts then a MCD1000, it just came out first. I would not call a C50 a full function D1100 as it is not fully balanced and the D1100 is. Both the MCD500 and MCD1000 are also fully balanced.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-04-2018, 07:03 AM
Charles Charles is online now
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,242
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1KW View Post
Having owned a MCD500 for many years and a D1100 for nearly a year I can say you won't be disappointed with either . The D1100 is in a different league as it has USB input for hi resolution DSD 64,128 and 256 (SACD is DSD64) as well as hi resolution PCM files. The MCD500 does not have cheaper parts then a MCD1000, it just came out first. I would not call a C50 a full function D1100 as it is not fully balanced and the D1100 is. Both the MCD500 and MCD1000 are also fully balanced.
I think it is important to note that any preamp with tone controls (equalizer) cannot be either fully balanced or dual mono. That's the reason I don't like tone controls. I am a purist. However, if you are not a purist and like tone controls, the C52 in my opinion will be far superior sonically to the MCD1100 in terms of USB or anything digital. In addition I understand it has a superior phono section. If you are reading this thread and want the best from Mac at a tremendous price go with the C52/MCT450 combo. My budget may be a little larger than some and I basically buy (within reason) what I want and I don't do vinyl. Never have and never will. But from a pure value standpoint the new stuff from Mac including their new amps represent (to me) the best values in highend audio. For about 27 grand based on Ivan's 2018 retail pricing you can have a system (two 611's/MCT450/C52) that rivals just about anything in terms of beauty, functionality, and sound quality. I think the C52 represents something really special.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-04-2018, 11:53 AM
Fido's Avatar
Fido Fido is offline
In the Wind!
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 83
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdandy View Post
Fido.......My McIntosh MCD1100 Review may be helpful in answering your question.
thanks for the replies fellas. I did find your very informative review jdandy! Excellent write up!
__________________
McIntosh C50, MCD1100, Oppo BDP-105D, Bryston
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:56 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video