AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > PMC Speakers

PMC Speakers UK's Finest

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-20-2011, 04:48 PM
jwhite613 jwhite613 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdebonth View Post
Ian,

I am currently running the FB1i's through a primare A32.2 power amp rated at 120W per channel into 8 Ohm; 200W per channel into 4 Ohm.

In the long term I would like to upgrade to OB1i, PB1i or EB1i with suitable McIntosh amplification, say the MC402.

I could upgrade the MC402 now and then upgrade the speaker in around 6months time however I prefer to upgrade the speaker first as I believe this will give me noticably better SQ than the amp upgrade.

Which PMC models would I be able to run with my current primare amp, I typically do not listen at high volume levels. Are the recommended power levels based on 8 Ohm or 4 Ohm?

Thanks!
Hi. I can tell my OB1i's sound great with my MC402. Great combo. I have no plans to upgrade either in the near future.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-21-2011, 10:15 PM
jbaudio68 jbaudio68 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 668
Default

Duplicate post. Please disregard.

Last edited by jbaudio68; 06-21-2011 at 11:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-21-2011, 10:43 PM
jbaudio68 jbaudio68 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 668
Default

Hey everyone. I hope I am replying properly to this post (Ive been following the posts but am new to replying). Please let me know if I am getting off track but I have some questions I hope you can help me with.

I am currently running an a pair of IB2S speakers via (2) mon-blocked 275s driven by an mcd500/apple PowerBook. I would be very happy if I had not heard a pair of ib2i speakers driven by 1.2k amps at audio classics. The 275s were preferred for the mids and highs but the low end was truly amazing with the 1.2k amps.

After the demo, I'm pretty sure I don't need the 1.2k amps but I do need something. I love tubes and know the ib2s speakers have the bass I need if I can power them correctly. So on to my questions:

C220MC275: are you happy the low end your mc2301s provide? Also, I saw your post using the 8 ohm taps for increased bass. Do you know if there is any risk setting the taps on my 275s to 8 ohm to test this?

Ian: I noticed the ib2 speakers had a lower handling requirement. Is this due to the smaller cabinets?

General: any thoughts on whether I would be better off with upgrading to the 2301s or bi-amping with a 602 (or perhaps upgrading to the 601s). I know some of this is preference but I wonder if any of these options are a clear no no based on my current speakers. If I can get a great sound without all the extra wires then that would be great.

Many thanks! - Jeremy
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-22-2011, 06:08 AM
klipschfan's Avatar
klipschfan klipschfan is offline
Against the Tide
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbaudio68 View Post
Hey everyone. I hope I am replying properly to this post (Ive been following the posts but am new to replying). Please let me know if I am getting off track but I have some questions I hope you can help me with.

I am currently running an a pair of IB2S speakers via (2) mon-blocked 275s driven by an mcd500/apple PowerBook. I would be very happy if I had not heard a pair of ib2i speakers driven by 1.2k amps at audio classics. The 275s were preferred for the mids and highs but the low end was truly amazing with the 1.2k amps.

After the demo, I'm pretty sure I don't need the 1.2k amps but I do need something. I love tubes and know the ib2s speakers have the bass I need if I can power them correctly. So on to my questions:

C220MC275: are you happy the low end your mc2301s provide? Also, I saw your post using the 8 ohm taps for increased bass. Do you know if there is any risk setting the taps on my 275s to 8 ohm to test this?

Ian: I noticed the ib2 speakers had a lower handling requirement. Is this due to the smaller cabinets?

General: any thoughts on whether I would be better off with upgrading to the 2301s or bi-amping with a 602 (or perhaps upgrading to the 601s). I know some of this is preference but I wonder if any of these options are a clear no no based on my current speakers. If I can get a great sound without all the extra wires then that would be great.

Many thanks! - Jeremy
Easy way out, least expensive and most likely the best sound would be to add (2) JL Audio F112 or F113 subs to your current system.

If you don't want to go the sub route. Go with a pair of MB2i/S.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-22-2011, 08:53 AM
kfr01's Avatar
kfr01 kfr01 is offline
Music Provides Joy
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbaudio68
Hey everyone. I hope I am replying properly to this post (Ive been following the posts but am new to replying). Please let me know if I am getting off track but I have some questions I hope you can help me with.

I am currently running an a pair of IB2S speakers via (2) mon-blocked 275s driven by an mcd500/apple PowerBook. I would be very happy if I had not heard a pair of ib2i speakers driven by 1.2k amps at audio classics. The 275s were preferred for the mids and highs but the low end was truly amazing with the 1.2k amps.

After the demo, I'm pretty sure I don't need the 1.2k amps but I do need something. I love tubes and know the ib2s speakers have the bass I need if I can power them correctly. So on to my questions:

C220MC275: are you happy the low end your mc2301s provide? Also, I saw your post using the 8 ohm taps for increased bass. Do you know if there is any risk setting the taps on my 275s to 8 ohm to test this?

Ian: I noticed the ib2 speakers had a lower handling requirement. Is this due to the smaller cabinets?

General: any thoughts on whether I would be better off with upgrading to the 2301s or bi-amping with a 602 (or perhaps upgrading to the 601s). I know some of this is preference but I wonder if any of these options are a clear no no based on my current speakers. If I can get a great sound without all the extra wires then that would be great.

Many thanks! - Jeremy
Those speakers should have more than enough bass for a moderately-sized room. It could be the room's fault. Do you have any treatment?
__________________
Karl

Listening Room (2 Channel): Vandersteen 5A speakers, Simaudio Moon Neo 400M Mono Block Amplifiers, Esoteric D-07X DAC (preamp) via Apple Mac Mini (Roon), Furman IT-Reference 20i Power Cond., Wireworld.
Listening Room (HT Portion): Vandersteen VCC-5 Center, Vandersteen VSM Signature Surrounds, JL Audio CR1 Crossover, JL Audio f110 v2 Subwoofer, Marantz SR 5010 Receiver, Wireworld

Office: KEF R500 Speakers; Sonos Amp fed by Roon
Family Room: Monitor Audio Silver RX6 speakers, McIntosh MA6600 Integrated Amplifier, Pro-Ject RME 9.1 TT w/ Sumiko Blackbird MC Cart.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-22-2011, 12:00 PM
Jerome W's Avatar
Jerome W Jerome W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbaudio68 View Post
Hey everyone. I hope I am replying properly to this post (Ive been following the posts but am new to replying). Please let me know if I am getting off track but I have some questions I hope you can help me with.

I am currently running an a pair of IB2S speakers via (2) mon-blocked 275s driven by an mcd500/apple PowerBook. I would be very happy if I had not heard a pair of ib2i speakers driven by 1.2k amps at audio classics. The 275s were preferred for the mids and highs but the low end was truly amazing with the 1.2k amps.

After the demo, I'm pretty sure I don't need the 1.2k amps but I do need something. I love tubes and know the ib2s speakers have the bass I need if I can power them correctly. So on to my questions:

C220MC275: are you happy the low end your mc2301s provide? Also, I saw your post using the 8 ohm taps for increased bass. Do you know if there is any risk setting the taps on my 275s to 8 ohm to test this?

Ian: I noticed the ib2 speakers had a lower handling requirement. Is this due to the smaller cabinets?

General: any thoughts on whether I would be better off with upgrading to the 2301s or bi-amping with a 602 (or perhaps upgrading to the 601s). I know some of this is preference but I wonder if any of these options are a clear no no based on my current speakers. If I can get a great sound without all the extra wires then that would be great.

Many thanks! - Jeremy
Hello Jeremy,

sorry I just saw your post today.
I have no problems t all with the bass of the 2301's on my speakers, quite the opposite : it is terrific. But some people do prefer the bass of SS amps.
Concerning your 275 in mono, they should not have any problem to drive the IB2 speakers. But you have to know that the impedance outputs of the 275 in mono is not the same as the one used in stereo : the 8 ohms tap become 16 ohms. If you want to get 8 ohms, you need to use the 4 ohm tap.
Cheers,
__________________
There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats
Albert Schweitzer
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-22-2011, 01:02 PM
ian@pmc's Avatar
ian@pmc ian@pmc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 356
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbaudio68 View Post
Hey everyone. I hope I am replying properly to this post (Ive been following the posts but am new to replying). Please let me know if I am getting off track but I have some questions I hope you can help me with.

I am currently running an a pair of IB2S speakers via (2) mon-blocked 275s driven by an mcd500/apple PowerBook. I would be very happy if I had not heard a pair of ib2i speakers driven by 1.2k amps at audio classics. The 275s were preferred for the mids and highs but the low end was truly amazing with the 1.2k amps.

After the demo, I'm pretty sure I don't need the 1.2k amps but I do need something. I love tubes and know the ib2s speakers have the bass I need if I can power them correctly. So on to my questions:

C220MC275: are you happy the low end your mc2301s provide? Also, I saw your post using the 8 ohm taps for increased bass. Do you know if there is any risk setting the taps on my 275s to 8 ohm to test this?

Ian: I noticed the ib2 speakers had a lower handling requirement. Is this due to the smaller cabinets?

General: any thoughts on whether I would be better off with upgrading to the 2301s or bi-amping with a 602 (or perhaps upgrading to the 601s). I know some of this is preference but I wonder if any of these options are a clear no no based on my current speakers. If I can get a great sound without all the extra wires then that would be great.

Many thanks! - Jeremy
Hi Jeremy,

It is indeed. It can handle more but this is just the recommended wattage, a benchmark if you will.

I don't think bi-amping is necessary, with a sufficient power amp you wouldn't see big game changing gains... If you like the tube sound then the 2301 may be the ideal amp for you.


Ian.
__________________
PMC, Bryston, Purist Audio Design.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-22-2011, 03:12 PM
BuffaloBill BuffaloBill is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by klipschfan View Post
Easy way out, least expensive and most likely the best sound would be to add (2) JL Audio F112 or F113 subs to your current system.
Peter Thomas would not recommend this approach.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-22-2011, 04:17 PM
ian@pmc's Avatar
ian@pmc ian@pmc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 356
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BuffaloBill View Post
Peter Thomas would not recommend this approach.
Two channel is most definitely best left to just two speakers... Especially with Ib2's which are most assuredly reaching down into the subsonic spectrum (<20hz).
__________________
PMC, Bryston, Purist Audio Design.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-22-2011, 04:19 PM
ian@pmc's Avatar
ian@pmc ian@pmc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 356
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ian@pmc View Post
Hi Jeremy,

It is indeed. It can handle more but this is just the recommended wattage, a benchmark if you will.

I don't think bi-amping is necessary, with a sufficient power amp you wouldn't see big game changing gains... If you like the tube sound then the 2301 may be the ideal amp for you.


Ian.
If a tubed McIntosh is what you are after...
__________________
PMC, Bryston, Purist Audio Design.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video