AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > McIntosh Audio

McIntosh Audio A Tradition of Excellence

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-21-2017, 04:40 PM
Msegal Msegal is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 468
Default Mp 1100

Does anyone have any information or experience with McIntosh's new top end phono stage?

Is it superior to the C1100 twin box, is it the same with added filters and ADC (YUCH!) or is it inferior (highly unlikely).

I am looking at possibly moving out of my Aesthetix Rhea Eclipse. This has been the best phono stage I have experienced possibly on par with my friends IO Eclipe with built in volume control.

I run my Rhea into a C500 (it's phono stage is quieter than the Rhea but no where's near as dynamic, musical, detailed, quick, etc. ) to a pair of MC275 LE mono's to Focal Scala's.

My reason for changing would be obtaining the new MP1100 filters and curves (Columbia , Decca, etc), getting a better range of matching impedance and added capacitance adjustments and aesthetically matching my other Mc gear (less important).

I run a ClearAudio Ovation with a Kuetsu Jade Platinum. The Jade is running at 75 ohms on the Rhea which is its lowest setting. The MP1100 will get down to 25 Ohms. Some reports indicate a lower impedance works better with the platinum magnets.

Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-28-2017, 04:56 PM
MisterBritt MisterBritt is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 708
Default

What McIntosh needs to get this product out of the blocks is a proper review. I'd be curious to discover what portion of the roughly $12,000 price is dedicated to the actual phono section, and what portion is the extraneous digital gadgetry. Then you've got another power cord, ICs, maybe some Stillpoints to add on as well. But for starters, I wish someone would do a review and we can see what's what.

http://www.mcintoshlabs.com/us/Produ...oductId=MP1100

Last edited by MisterBritt; 03-28-2017 at 04:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-28-2017, 06:31 PM
Msegal Msegal is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 468
Default

I did have my authorized dealer speak to Mr. Hinton at McIntosh. This is what I have learned:

1) the current phono stage used by McIntosh is "the best" phono stage they have ever made and there is no plans to improve it.

2) the phono stage in the C500, C1000, C1100 and MP1100 are the "same stage".

3) the MP 1100 is for the vinylphile who wishes/needs the additional equalization curves, the added high frequency/rumble/click filters, three inputs for multiple tonearm systems and digital conversion of albums.

It seems an expensive luxury but it has features which some may deem essential in a McIntosh phono/pre with no alternative.

I will not be slipping out of my Rhea Eclipse for the MP 1100 at this time. My personal comparison between the phono stage in the C500T and the Aesthetix Rhea (non Ecplise) was strongly in favor of the John White tubed beauty. The C500T was quieter than the Rhea but it lacked the "magic" of the Rhea.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-28-2017, 07:14 PM
MisterBritt MisterBritt is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Msegal View Post
I did have my authorized dealer speak to Mr. Hinton at McIntosh. This is what I have learned:

1) the current phono stage used by McIntosh is "the best" phono stage they have ever made and there is no plans to improve it.

2) the phono stage in the C500, C1000, C1100 and MP1100 are the "same stage".

3) the MP 1100 is for the vinylphile who wishes/needs the additional equalization curves, the added high frequency/rumble/click filters, three inputs for multiple tonearm systems and digital conversion of albums.

It seems an expensive luxury but it has features which some may deem essential in a McIntosh phono/pre with no alternative.

I will not be slipping out of my Rhea Eclipse for the MP 1100 at this time. My personal comparison between the phono stage in the C500T and the Aesthetix Rhea (non Ecplise) was strongly in favor of the John White tubed beauty. The C500T was quieter than the Rhea but it lacked the "magic" of the Rhea.
Excellent post. Thank you so much!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-29-2017, 07:17 PM
leftside's Avatar
leftside leftside is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 237
Default

I found similar when comparing the Audia Flight phono stage to the C500T. I really was hoping to sell the Audia Flight and keep just the C500T, but the Audia Flight will be staying for now. I absolutely love the C500T, but yes, the phono stage can be beaten, but you have to spend about half the price of the C500T on a separate phono stage in my experience.

I have some Gold Lion and Telefunken tubes that I need to install into the C500T and see if that makes any difference.
__________________
Turntable: VPI Prime Signature Cart: Benz Micro LP-S DAC: Lampizator Golden Atlantic Preamp: Mac C500T, Mac MX121 Amps: Mac MC75 * 2 60th Anniv., Mac MC205 Speakers: Dynaudio C1 Platinum, B&W 804S, Totems Headphone amp: Glenn 300B Headphones: LCD-4
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-29-2017, 10:18 PM
PMCH's Avatar
PMCH PMCH is offline
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Cleveland suburbs
Posts: 1,463
Default

I sure hope that Chuck was mistaken and the MP1100 sounds a lot better than the phono stage in my C1100. I only use my Audia Flight phono stage since I much prefer it over the phono stage in my C1100.
__________________
Paul

Harbeth 40.3 XD, Sound Anchor stands w/ Stillpoints, Luxman M900 & C900, Aurender N20, Jay's Audio CDT3 - MK3 CD player, Mola Mola Tambaqui DAC, Shunyata Everest, Altaira
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-30-2017, 06:10 PM
leftside's Avatar
leftside leftside is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PMCH View Post
I sure hope that Chuck was mistaken and the MP1100 sounds a lot better than the phono stage in my C1100. I only use my Audia Flight phono stage since I much prefer it over the phono stage in my C1100.
Agreed. This does seem a little odd:

1) the current phono stage used by McIntosh is "the best" phono stage they have ever made and there is no plans to improve it.

2) the phono stage in the C500, C1000, C1100 and MP1100 are the "same stage".

Perhaps me meant MP100
__________________
Turntable: VPI Prime Signature Cart: Benz Micro LP-S DAC: Lampizator Golden Atlantic Preamp: Mac C500T, Mac MX121 Amps: Mac MC75 * 2 60th Anniv., Mac MC205 Speakers: Dynaudio C1 Platinum, B&W 804S, Totems Headphone amp: Glenn 300B Headphones: LCD-4
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-30-2017, 07:15 PM
Msegal Msegal is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leftside View Post
Agreed. This does seem a little odd:



1) the current phono stage used by McIntosh is "the best" phono stage they have ever made and there is no plans to improve it.



2) the phono stage in the C500, C1000, C1100 and MP1100 are the "same stage".



Perhaps me meant MP100


I am afraid it was theMP1100 and not the MP100.

If you check out Michael Fremers review of the MP100 on "his website " you can clearly see the solid state board and compare it to any of the tubed twin box McIntosh preamps to see the difference.

I too question the wisdom of the MP1100. I would not be surprised to see it residing right in the middle of a stack of C1100 and D1100.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-30-2017, 10:32 PM
leftside's Avatar
leftside leftside is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Msegal View Post
I am afraid it was theMP1100 and not the MP100.

If you check out Michael Fremers review of the MP100 on "his website " you can clearly see the solid state board and compare it to any of the tubed twin box McIntosh preamps to see the difference.

I too question the wisdom of the MP1100. I would not be surprised to see it residing right in the middle of a stack of C1100 and D1100.
Would be a bit of a waste of money though if the MP1100 was the same phono stage as in the C1100.
__________________
Turntable: VPI Prime Signature Cart: Benz Micro LP-S DAC: Lampizator Golden Atlantic Preamp: Mac C500T, Mac MX121 Amps: Mac MC75 * 2 60th Anniv., Mac MC205 Speakers: Dynaudio C1 Platinum, B&W 804S, Totems Headphone amp: Glenn 300B Headphones: LCD-4
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-30-2017, 10:40 PM
JBT JBT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lago Vista Texas Downtown Austin and Frisco Colorado
Posts: 2,017
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leftside View Post
Would be a bit of a waste of money though if the MP1100 was the same phono stage as in the C1100.
I find it hard to believe.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:35 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video