AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Audio & Video > CD Players, Digital Music & Servers

CD Players, Digital Music & Servers Aurender, dCs, Esoteric, Lumin.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-09-2017, 06:15 AM
essjay's Avatar
essjay essjay is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: earth
Posts: 504
Default

The other point of merit is over on SHTV, a lot of the people commenting on MQA are professional audio engineers, they make music for a living, its how they put food on the table and even they are saying its a scam....
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-09-2017, 08:52 AM
JBT JBT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lago Vista Texas Downtown Austin and Frisco Colorado
Posts: 2,017
Default

Here's a warning from Charles Hansen of Ayre Acoustics.




Be careful what you wish for. If MQA is widely adopted, I can assure you that "this little bit of DRM" will grow to unrecognizable proportions.

As publicly held companies, the legal mandate of the record labels is to maximize their profits. Look what they did with vinyl in 1989 - at that time there were dozens of independent record labels. And even though LP constuted 1/3 of all sales (cassette was 1/3 and CD was also 1/3), they were able to do an under-the-table collusion to pull the plug on LP. All vinyl was gone. The only reason they are reintroducing it now is because people will pay $30 a pop and it is "pirate-proof".

It'n not hard to see that if MQA ever becomes established that the labels will drop both high-res *and* CD, both of which can be pirated. In that scenario you will not only need to replace your hardware with MQA-compatible equipment, but they will stop selling discs altogether and only allow streaming (renting). There will be no limits to the prices they charge, and there will be no limits to how much undecoded MQA files are degraded. Just look at the MQA patent applications to understand their true intentions.

If they did it all at once, it would be instantly rejected by everybody. But if they sneak it in, piece-by-piece (first under the guise of "improved sound quality for no increase in your rental fees"), they can slowly screw the consumer once it is established.



https://www.audioasylum.com/forums/c...s/8/88221.html
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-09-2017, 09:19 AM
Still-One Still-One is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Milford, MI
Posts: 32,465
Default

How can a guy who makes good gear by such a duffus.

Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-09-2017, 09:39 AM
GSOphile GSOphile is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: NC
Posts: 554
Default

You may not agree with him, but IMO Charlie Hansen is no duffus.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-09-2017, 10:25 AM
Garytn Garytn is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 230
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GSOphile View Post
You may not agree with him, but IMO Charlie Hansen is no duffus.


+1
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-09-2017, 10:39 AM
Blueoak Blueoak is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 176
Default

We should all write a letter to our favorite manufacturers and tell them to stay away from MQA.

Anything where royalties and licenses are required to use technology always kills it.

FLAC is just fine.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-09-2017, 10:47 AM
Still-One Still-One is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Milford, MI
Posts: 32,465
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueoak View Post
We should all write a letter to our favorite manufacturers and tell them to stay away from MQA.

Anything where royalties and licenses are required to use technology always kills it.

FLAC is just fine.
Why don't you write letters to stop DSD DAC's too?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-09-2017, 11:09 AM
Still-One Still-One is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Milford, MI
Posts: 32,465
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GSOphile View Post
You may not agree with him, but IMO Charlie Hansen is no duffus.
Sorry. Correction not a duffus but Chicken Little. The Sky is Falling.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-09-2017, 02:00 PM
Mikado463 Mikado463 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: SE Pa
Posts: 3,925
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Still-One View Post
Sorry. Correction not a duffus but Chicken Little. The Sky is Falling.
Jim the picture you posted ...... was he to be the poster child for 'Hershey Kiss' ?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-09-2017, 04:36 PM
bigblue bigblue is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 537
Default

Just to put all the interesting opinions in this threat into context. It would be interesting to know how many have heard an actual A/B demo with proper MQA equipment.
I have just been to a MQA demo - but they did not play the original file, so I can´t really compare yet.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:09 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video