#21
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Thanks for sharing! Nice review. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
+2
Nice review, nice comments, great pleasure! Bertrand Last edited by Picto; 07-02-2014 at 04:53 AM. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
dcvibe... Very nice review and I think many are interested to see how these speakers compares.
I think you need to check the Alexia as well. They are terrific speakers. BTW, it is sometimes good to look at new speakers and gears to realize the quality of what you have at home. |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
I listened to both M5 and Q5 with same equipments behind. Q5 sounded smoother and more dynamic compared to M5. Having said, M5 was not far behind.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you for the answer but do you know what models of each components were used? Really interested in what MIT's were used!
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
I'm sorry I do not know the model of the MIT's. I'll try to find out.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
MIT SL matrix 90.
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Very nice review. All of the candidates are excellent speakers. Comes down to personal taste.
Maybe I missed it but did you get a chance to listen to the Sasha 2s?
__________________
Mike |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
I did not get to listen to Sasha 2.
|
|
|
Audio Aficionado Sponsors | |