#61
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Here, I felt the effort was rather too controlled, as the playing sounded more concerned with a certain evenness of performance and mistake avoidance. The first movement seemed lacking in overall vivacity as the tempo and dynamic contrasts were held tightly in check. (Even the cuckoo-ing clarinet sound more like the Emperor's mechanical nightingale on cough syrup, without the woody lit-from-within tone of which the instrument is capable with this part.) Then the climax at first movement's end sounded a bit rushed. Maybe I'm being too harsh; it is a thoughtful performance with an internal logic. The final movement is excellent. I just kept wanting Ivan to open things up a bit more early on and let the music breath. Nonetheless, definitely worth adding to a Mahler collection. Overall, the SACD sonics were top notch -what we've come to expect from this group. |
#62
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I'm listening to Fischer's No. 2 now and it is quite good so far. Will have to compare to Solti/LSO as well.
__________________
—Dean |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
I grew up listening to Solti, then Karajan, finally, Sinopoli. Overall, I prefer Sinopoli.
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
I grew up listening to Bernstein, then Kubelik, then Sinopoli, then Zander and MTT and, finally, Abbado. Overall, I prefer Abbado.
|
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Among SACD recordings, I enjoy Zander and a few of Gergiev's--the 6th (the first movement is too fast, though), 8th, and 9th. For whatever reason, his 5th is very flat and stale. Fischer's 1st and 2nd are wonderful, too.
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Try Abbado on BD.
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
well, as my system is coming together (dynaudio focus 160s, jolida fx tube dac, naim nait 5i and an oppo 103(primarily a cd transport)), iand now I have been finding myself getting more and more into classical music. I recently picked up the Mahlers 5th by Michael Tilson Thomas and the SFSO. I was buying on SACD, that will be downmixed to 2-ch pcm output via optical to my dac.
I really have no idea of what Im doing when it comes to buying classical. I did notice that I really enjoyed the Symphony Hall channel on satelite radio. There i heard a version of Mahlers 5th, and loved it. So I bought this version, mostly because it seemed that they conductor and orchestra have done all of Mahlers works, so Im hoping they have a good interpretation of them. Does anyone know how this work compares to some of the better ones or worse ones out there? My next purchase I was thinking of going this route, because I wanted to see how it compared to the other. http://www.amazon.com/Mahler-Symphon...ds=mahler+sacd Any advise on classical in general would be awesome.
__________________
Dynaudio 160s, Naim 5i, Jolida DAC, Oppo 103 |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
When you buy a ticket to MahlerWorld, you can ride all day for the rest of your life. Some folks find an interest with one symphony then start exploring the others in the order Mahler wrote them. But there is no right or wrong way to go. The 1st Symphony is the easiest entre to Mahler, a must hear in my opinion. Mahler's 2nd is one his most popular; there, the Channel Classics SACD w/ Ivan Fischer has been very well received. While this is foremost a Mahler thread, I'll touch on your general question about classical music. If you like what you hear from Mahler, you might branch out to other works and composers from his general era. I have a very strong preference for Sibelius. You might enjoy his 2nd Symphony. If you prefer melodic easily digested large scale orchestral music, Tchaikovsky was late 19thC, and is quite accessible; you might enjoy his 4th Symphony. In a more modern direction, consider Stravinsky and his music from the Firebird ballet, surely an example of rhythmic genius. Back in time, there's no reason not to jump directly to Beethoven; I'd recommend his 6th Symphony. And on it goes. For me personally, even if I don't care for a work the first time around, I'll replay it several times to learn more and let it grow on me (if it will.) Happily there is lots to explore and the potential for a lifetime of enjoyment. Feel free to follow-up; with luck you'll hear from others. |
#69
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I would add Brahms 1, Dvorak 9, Bruckner 4, Mozart 40 & 41, Haydn (any or all of the "London" symphonies), Stravinsky Symphony in Three Movements & Symphony in C.
__________________
—Dean |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|
Audio Aficionado Sponsors | |