AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Audio & Video > Subwoofers

Subwoofers 80hz and Down under!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-08-2017, 01:37 PM
Mike-48 Mike-48 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Posts: 197
Question What crossovers/EQs are available?

I've used stereo subs for 10 yrs now. At first, I used a TacT 2.2X to implement crossover, sub time alignment, and LF EQ. Then a mod shop stole my TacT. I replaced it with a Classé CP-800, and now I'm wondering about updating that, but there is not much high-end gear aimed at 4-channel systems (2 main, 2 sub), as far as I can see.

What I am looking for:
  • Digital crossover between main and sub
  • Adjustments for sub-main timing (distance) in each channel
  • PEQ (automated or manual), mainly for f < 500 Hz or so (if auto, must be tweakable manually)
  • Tilt or tone controls (digital) to adjust poor recordings
  • A 4-channel DAC for mains and subs (but could use external DAC(s))
  • Relatively straightforward to set up and operate

What I decided on was a Classé CP-800, which has most of the above, but lacks any sub-main timing adjustment. It also lacks a way to set sub levels -- one has to do that at the subs, which in my case (JL F112) means tweaking small, uncalibrated knobs. I use a Dayton Omni mic to get a starting point for manual LF corrections made with the CP-800's PEQ.

Here is some current gear that might work in such a system (my thoughts in parens). I'd appreciate comments if people have tried some of this, and also about what other pieces are good possibilities.
  • DEQX Premate (Great DAC IME, but clanking relays on SR change; overly complex to set up)
  • JL Audio CR-1 (crossover only, no EQ, which disqualifies it)
  • Trinnov Amethyst (enticing if expensive)
  • Lyngdorf gear (lacks manual tweaks to "Room Perfect" auto EQ)
  • Classé (unreleased) CP-800 replacement
  • Devialet ??? (don't know much about it)
  • DSpeaker X4 (not yet released; appears to lack sub digital outs, AES3 ins; but otherwise a yes on features, at least)

An alternative would be JRiver and/or Acourate (or similar software) on a computer in the listening room. I have so far avoided having a computer there, as I think it would be a distraction. Also, Acourate corrections seem quite complex to get and keep running.

If anyone in Audio Aficionado is using such gear, it would be those in the subwoofer forum, so opinions, please!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-08-2017, 06:24 PM
djwhog's Avatar
djwhog djwhog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 7,021
Default

Look at a DBX Drive Rack PA ora DBX DriveRack 260 or top end a dbx DriveRack VENU360

I run the Rack PA for one of my subs it is clean and very versital etc. Unlinited anount of EQ and points etc for a sub, mono, stereo, or 3way. 260 add EQ

dbx DriveRack PA2 Loudspeaker Management System at a Glance:
  • Take control of your PA system with this state-of-the-art loudspeaker management system
  • Automatically set up your PA with updated Wizard functions
  • Take control of the DriveRack PA2 with your favorite mobile device or laptop
  • Enhanced Advanced Feedback Suppression and AutoEQ functions
  • Includes dbx's legendary compression
  • Works with Android, iOS, Mac, and Windows devices
  • Built-in crossover, limiting, and driver alignment delays
  • Note: RTA microphone is NOT included


dbx DriveRack 260 features: 31 band EQ
  • Feedback elimination
  • 2.7 seconds of Alignment and Zone Delay
  • RS-232 PC GUI control
  • Classic dbx Compression and Limiting
  • Graphic and Parametric EQ
  • Auto-EQ function
  • Full Bandpass, Crossover, and Routing configurations
  • Auto Gain control
  • Pink Noise Generator and fulltime RTA
  • Set-up Wizard with JBL speaker and Crown Power Amp tunings
  • Security lockout
  • Wall Panel Control inputs
dbx DriveRack VENU360 Loudspeaker Management Processor Features:
  • AFS automatically identifies feedback frequencies and eliminates the problem
  • Driver alignment and zone delay functions
  • Wireless control from your Mac, PC, iOS, or Android devices
  • Classic transparent dbx compression and limiting
  • Graphic and parametric EQs for fine-tuning control
  • Auto-EQ function takes the guesswork out of tuning your PA to troublesome rooms
  • Full bandpass, crossover, and routing configurations up to 6-way operation
  • Auto gain control for easy setup
  • Subharmonic synthesis gives your bass a boost
  • Set-up wizard with speaker and amp tunings makes light work of system tuning
  • Security lockout keeps curious fingers from ruining your setup
  • Compatible with Ethernet audio wall controllers for installed sound
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-08-2017, 06:26 PM
Kal Rubinson Kal Rubinson is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,588
Default

I prefer the computer route but you might also look at the Illusonic line: http://www.illusonic.com/audio-processors/iap-4/

FWIW, I really liked the DEQX but it has too few channels for me.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-08-2017, 06:45 PM
djwhog's Avatar
djwhog djwhog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 7,021
Default

I use both the computer too, but you will get to tell your amp what to really do so much more so with an active crossover. Really makes the bass drive as it should. That is how it is done by the pros.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-08-2017, 07:38 PM
Kal Rubinson Kal Rubinson is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,588
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djwhog View Post
I use both the computer too, but you will get to tell your amp what to really do so much more so with an active crossover. Really makes the bass drive as it should. That is how it is done by the pros.
Active or not has nothing to do with whether you use a computer or if you use a flexible processor like the Illusonic. There are many ways...................
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-08-2017, 08:20 PM
Mike-48 Mike-48 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Posts: 197
Default

Kal, Thanks for the pointer. I was not familiar with Illusonic; now I see you reviewed it in 2014. Seems too expensive for me, which makes one more datum telling me a cost-effective setup will probably involve a computer. The data are getting pretty hard to ignore, but for some reason, I keep resisting. Maybe I need "Acourate for Dummies."

I liked the DEQX, too, even without calibrating it, but the clanking relays were a deal-breaker. It also was enormously irritating that the instructions are opaque, and DEQX charges the user for help setting up a $5000 piece. Still, I thought the DAC was one of the best I've heard.

(BTW, I'm the same Mike who lived in NC and had a pair of Revel Ultima Studios.)

djwhog, Thanks for your suggestion. I notice that Sanders uses the DBX Venu360 in their top-end system. It's cheap enough to experiment with. My impression is that it has only analog outs; in other words, you have to use the built-in DACs. Is that right?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-08-2017, 08:21 PM
doguniverse doguniverse is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: south florida
Posts: 388
Default

Do not worry about your Tact. The company is longer in business plus there no upgrades for that unit. I used to have a Tact 2.2 that I used in the car. Fantastic sound and clean, I did not have to worry about the reflection coming off the glass.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-08-2017, 08:42 PM
Mike-48 Mike-48 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Posts: 197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doguniverse View Post
Do not worry about your Tact. The company is longer in business plus there no upgrades for that unit. I used to have a Tact 2.2 that I used in the car. Fantastic sound and clean, I did not have to worry about the reflection coming off the glass.
I'm past worry, though I regret the cost of the unit and the progress payments I made for parts. I think that, with the upgrades promised to clocking circuits and power supplies, it would have been a pretty good unit today.

You used a Tact 2.2X in the car? Did you have an inverter to supply 110 VAC?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-08-2017, 10:22 PM
doguniverse doguniverse is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: south florida
Posts: 388
Default

I changed out the AC power supply to DC. One of the best sounding cars I ever had. I used the Denon head unit, a lot of Brax amps, and Dynaudio speakers. I even entered into some car audio tournaments. I had add some JL audio subs to compete. I am also a Ham radio user, so I put the head unit of an Icom radio in the ashtray to hide it. All this was put in a 1999 BMW 740il.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-28-2017, 11:54 AM
Mike-48 Mike-48 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Posts: 197
Default

To those who prefer the computer route: How do you manage source switching? That's something that has puzzled me in thinking about a computer-based main audio system.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:47 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video