|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
dCS Bartok
I thought I'd start a thread about the new dCS Bartok, to allow AA members to share their thoughts and impressions of this new product.
I will start with my experience. I own a PS Audio Directstream DAC w Bridge II (and snowmass firmware), which I have been happy with. My dealer got a visit by a couple folks from dCS and they brought a Bartok demo unit with them. I asked whether they would be ok to do a direct shoot out between the Bartok and the DirectStream (my hope was to prove to myself that I had reached a point of very limited returns and that differences between the two units would be incredibly minor or differences of subjective taste at best). The setup consisted of Wilson Yvette speakers, ARC Ref6, transparent (super?) interconnects for both DACs, stock power cables on both units and the ARC REF75SE. Each DAC was fed the same songs via Roon over a locally switched ethernet connection. Each DAC's output was level matched to each other. The room was sound treated. I played a variety of tracks from electronic music albums (Trentemoller "The Last Resort", Shpongle) to more standard classical fare( Nemanja Radulovic's recent "Journey East" , Andras Schiff Bach concertos, Hilary Hahn Mozart and Bach concertos). The rep played some Beyonce and some other tracks I didnt recognize Overall the PS Audio Directstream comported itself pretty well, the dCS representative was kind enough to acknowledge as much . However, and not entirely surprising given the significant difference in cost, there were definitely notable performance differences I could discern. The dCS rendered a more holographic soundstage, mid bass content was more cleanly and clearly rendered, the tails of room reverb and effects especially on high res material was more clearly represented lending the music a more lifelike, vibrant sense. Overall the presentation seemed more warm without being colored, more emotionally engaging on the dCS (I dont know the filter chosen for sure, I believe Filter 3 was engaged?) I never thought I would spend that much on a DAC...but to me the differences in performance were enough to order a Bartok, which should get here within the next 3-4 weeks. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks for sharing your review. I've been waiting to hear some firsthand accounts of the Bartok. I'll look forward to hearing your thoughts once you're able to get it into your own system.
__________________
- Dan Headphone rig: Gustard X16, Topping A90, Hifiman HE6se, Audeze LCD2 2-Channel setup: Okto Research DAC8 Stereo, Bryston 4Bł, Philharmonic Audio BMR Towers, Dual PSA S152 subs |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Nice DAC you have bought, I am also thinking to jump on the dCS "train", have a Rossini player DAC in my system at the moment and I don't want to take it out.
__________________
Moon 700i V2, dCS Rossini, YG Acoustics Hailey, Aurender N10, Ansuz Mainz D2 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Sebastian congratulations on the Bartok
__________________
Flemming |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Dis you upgrade your Rossini with version 2.0?
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
Moon 700i V2, dCS Rossini, YG Acoustics Hailey, Aurender N10, Ansuz Mainz D2 |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I have only read positive comments on the Bartok.
I too went PS early on and my experience indicated they make a good sounding DAC and Transport, a great value for the money. Enjoy your new player! |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
I’m really thinking about selling my K-03X and getting a Bartok.
__________________
Analog: VPI Classic Direct (12" Fatboy) with Ortofon A95 cartridge; Ortofon ST-80SE Transformer; McIntosh C2500. Digital: SilenZio Gen 3 High Performance Media Server; Esoteric K-03X. Supporting System: McIntosh MX122 A/V Center; MC205 Amplifier; Bryston 14bSST2 Amplifier; PS Audio P10 Power Reconditioner; Revel Salon 2 Mains; Revel Voice 2 CC; JL Audio f113v2 (2); JL Audio CR-1 Crossover; Focal IC1002 Surrounds |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I compared a dCS Bartok with an MSB analog DAC and with a DirectStream DAC as well in my home system (Esoteric X01-XS as transport->McIntosh C22->ARCGS150->Wilson Sasha 2; power conditioner and great cables), and I thought the Bartok was better than either, although I agree that these comparisons can be subjective. The Bartok had a more "holographic" soundstage (not that different from that of the Vivaldi DAC, which I have also demoed), and I agree with that of the OP.
The midrange exhibited greater resolution, and upper bass frequencies were also notably better. I listen to mostly classical string music and opera, with some jazz and rock thrown in from my past. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Here are some of the initial reviews I could find:
https://parttimeaudiophile.com/2018/...-first-listen/ https://www.innerfidelity.com/conten...ks-youth-today https://audiophilestyle.com/ca/bits-...w-bartok-r743/ https://www.audiostream.com/content/...es-dcs-debussy |
|
|
Audio Aficionado Sponsors | |