AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > Audio Research

Audio Research State of the Art Audio Reproduction

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-16-2014, 10:30 PM
essjay's Avatar
essjay essjay is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: earth
Posts: 504
Default

I am very very happy with my ref 3, and if a ref 3 is as good as I am finding it then the ref5e surely has to be a major step up which i find hard to believe because the ref 3 is so darn good.

Anyone who says the ARC reference level gear is horrible must be either doing something very wrong, has an agenda or is being paid to say as much.

Just my uneducated opinion as always
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-17-2014, 12:19 AM
pete6737 pete6737 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: North Florida
Posts: 521
Default

I love what my Ref5se has done to the sound in my system. I can't wait to get an ARC ref150 and maybe a Cd9. Still working OT for them! Without a direct comparison, I can't say that I'd pass on the ref150 for the gs150. Yes I'm new to the Arc family but I'm pressing on with the all Arc Ref system I heard at the dealer. Pete
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-17-2014, 12:56 AM
cma29's Avatar
cma29 cma29 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Columbia, Missouri, USA
Posts: 4,405
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2fastdriving View Post
Man, what has gotten into everyone on arc gear lately? We have this thread where people claim the Ref5se is horrible, and another thread that claims the ref75 and Ref 150 are worthless compared to the new "flagship" gs150! Gimme a break.

Nothing arc makes in this league is bad, it's all very, very good, and although there's always "better" and "worse", let's cut the hyperbole!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alki View Post
+1, when individuals make the statements that caused you to write this response it reduces their credibility. IMO when you compare most well known components in a similar price range one will not smear, crush, annihilate, or mop the floor with the other. But every one is entitled to their opinion, my guess is that it helps them justify what they paid for their new component.
Exactly. Well said.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-17-2014, 12:58 AM
2fastdriving 2fastdriving is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,772
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pete6737 View Post
I love what my Ref5se has done to the sound in my system. I can't wait to get an ARC ref150 and maybe a Cd9. Still working OT for them! Without a direct comparison, I can't say that I'd pass on the ref150 for the gs150. Yes I'm new to the Arc family but I'm pressing on with the all Arc Ref system I heard at the dealer. Pete
Make sure you listen to the ref75 too. Some people think it sounds at least as good as the 150, yet it provides easier bias adjustments and looks great too. And you can save $$$
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-17-2014, 01:59 AM
NOLG4EVR NOLG4EVR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 688
Default

I enjoyed my Ref5se and Ref 250's for the time I owned them. Very good gear.

Even though I have moved on I would never say anything to disparage ARC products. Every ear is different but it is rare to hear any ARC Ref piece described as horrible.Very surprised to read that opinion in comparison to CJ, or anything else for that matter.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
J.J.

Shindo D'Yquems
Shindo Vosne Romanee
Devore 0/96
Luxman PD-171
Dynavector xx2 MkII
Luxman DA-06
Mac Mini
Magnum Dynalab MD 107t
Shindo and A23 Cables
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-17-2014, 07:20 AM
turntable's Avatar
turntable turntable is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Downunder in Sydney
Posts: 1,774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by analog brother View Post
hahaha! was it really that bad?
you make it sound so bad!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number95 View Post
Absolutely nonsense piece of information unless you had a faulty Ref5se.
Quote:
Originally Posted by doggiehowser View Post
I disagree. If you have equipment that works best with balanced connections, a properly run in Ref 5SE IMHO bested the CJ through the same gear.
Probably not quite as bad as I made out, however it certainly had nothing on the cj GAT and was a huge disappointment. I owned and ran the thing for 2 months after it had over 600 hours on it, so very well run in as store demo unit. I had planned to sell my cj GAT and run balanced with the Dag amp, so certainly no agenda on my part. AB, ask Janson how much I liked it

I ran it balanced, SE with Pass X350 and Dag Stereo as well as my cj tube amps. I even put the thing on Still points so it was the same as the cj GAT.

It sounded slow, ponderous as if I had put a smokers jacket on and aged 30 years. Nice for intimate jazz or vocals perhaps and it did have a high soundstage.

CJ GAT is faster, more lively, better bass control, vocals out in front a bit more and plays music. Ref5SE played musak in direct comparison, certainly nothing like neutral.

very happy to get the thing out of my system.

sometimes the grass is not always greener.

YMMV in your system cheers

Last edited by turntable; 11-17-2014 at 07:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-17-2014, 09:42 AM
analog brother's Avatar
analog brother analog brother is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 359
Default

yep indeed, janson has told me the story a few times! lol
i've heard it only once at nick's but was only for 5 mins or so in an unfamiliar system.
wish i could have borrowed it around the same time as you did.......just to put the 'what-if?' thought to rest.
i respect your opinion though, and everybody's opinion has a right to be different.
it's like how i'm the only guy i know who likes the new scott walker album......haha

Last edited by analog brother; 11-17-2014 at 09:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-17-2014, 01:17 PM
Mikeoz Mikeoz is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by turntable View Post
It sounded slow, ponderous as if I had put a smokers jacket on and aged 30 years. Nice for intimate jazz or vocals perhaps and it did have a high soundstage.
I've never read it described like that. Your unit must have been faulty.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-17-2014, 09:49 PM
cmalak's Avatar
cmalak cmalak is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,602
Default

Shane...I am surprised too by your description. Could have been a faulty unit (maybe a bad tube)...dunno but your description does not jive with what many of us have heard with the Ref 5SE nor the descriptions of the unit in most reviews. Neutrality is the hallmark of ARC tubes to the detriment of some who like more burnished hues that tube gear often deliver. Anyhoo, that's neither here or there. That was your experience and of course the GAT is a fine piece of gear (in the US it's also $7K more expensive than the Ref 5SE). I would have put the old Ref 40 (now superseded by the Ref 10) as the closer competitor to the GAT but again that's neither here nor there. Enjoy.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-18-2014, 01:00 AM
Puma Cat's Avatar
Puma Cat Puma Cat is online now
Cool, calm scientist
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: East Bay, CA
Posts: 10,939
Default

Honestly, guys, if you haven't heard Shane's ARC next to his GAT in his system, I don't think anyone is in a positon to say it's faulty, he's wrong, etc. etc. With all due respect, there's a lot of supposition in these comments, but Shane and his friends are the only ones that actually have the "data" of a first-hand comparison and having lived with both.

On the other hand, since it came up, I've heard the some of the Shindo gear extensively, and while the Giscours (the preamp I heard the most) is a fine preamp, it by no means is the best preamp I've ever heard, and for my money, there is a lot of gear out there that, IMO, betters Shindo in a number of respects. None of the Shindo gear I've comes close to DarTZeel, for example.

I have good friend who has a pair of Wavac amplifiers that considerably outperformed Shindo Lafons, as well. And by a long way, IMHO. The Lafons were...meh. The Wavacs are absolutely incredible.
__________________
Lumin P1 streamer/DAC/preamp, Constellation Inspiration integrated TT: Michell Gyro SE MkII, SME V, Koetsu Urushi Vermilion, EAR324. Harbeth 30.2s, REL R-305, Shunyata Alpha V2 ICs, Alpha V2 SPs, Sigma XC, Sigma NRv2, Omega QR-s & Alpha NRv2 PCs, segmented Altaira SG stack w/ Alpha & Omega CGCs, Everest 8000 PD. Remote Server Room: Uptone EtherREGEN, AfterDark Master Clock & LPS, Alita, Battle Angel, (Akasa NUC Roon Core), iFi DC Purifiers (for SMPS used for Alita & router), Shunyata Gemini combo power distributor & Altaira-type CG GP-NR hub, Venom & Alpha CGCs, Shunyata NRv14 power cords for digital components.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:03 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video