#11
|
|||
|
|||
Was interested in 2SE until reading our member compared it to Ref phono 10. Then 2SE become less attractive to me. But 10 is also way out of reach. Sigh...
Last edited by TOGA; 09-10-2014 at 01:17 PM. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
ref 10 is the one, but very expensive.
2se should be good and close enough!!! |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
+1. I'm very satisfied with my Ref Phono 2SE.
__________________
Vivid Giya G2 | D'Agostino Momentum Integrated | SME 20/3A| DS Audio E1 | Aurender A10 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
+2
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Whether it is close to Ref10, my answer would be related to rest of the system, such that a system capable of reproducing higher resolution would get a clear difference in every way. The margin is no less than Ref 10 preamp vs Ref 5 SE. I still recommend Toga to go with Ref2SE unless he spends 50k+ for analog. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Toga will consider it then ..
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
see; good, logical advice!
it's all relative. ref 10 has the dual mono sep power supply. that is the main difference. much more money though... |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Might I borrow your spare Ref10 line if you are not running it Numbers
Last edited by Harlequin; 09-13-2014 at 06:50 AM. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
You are welcome to listen anytime Harlequin
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
as you wish.. And yes ... An outstanding one. yes I hate to have tubes, but I have to... hmm.. one last one to bring home for audition is LAMM LP2.1 and may be even Aesthetix Rhea Signature.
However with low gain, pre amp vol reached 70 and still no kick , while on high gain preamp volume required only 30 to be very loud. Toga Last edited by TOGA; 09-14-2014 at 05:57 AM. |
|
|
Audio Aficionado Sponsors | |