AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > Pass Labs

Pass Labs 20 Years and Counting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-19-2019, 03:47 PM
daveneumann's Avatar
daveneumann daveneumann is online now
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 253
Default Stereophile review of XP-22

A good review by Jim Austin. His summary is consistent with my experience with the XP-22:

"...the XP-22 sounded great: full-bodied, rich-toned, robust, resolving, spacious, essentially neutral."

https://www.stereophile.com/content/...e-preamplifier
__________________
SF Stradivari, Pass 260.8 amps, Pass XP 22; Pass XP 17, Raven One TT, Graham Phantom II arm, Lyra Etna, Airtight PC1, Transparent Reference, dedicated room 17 X 34 X 9
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-16-2019, 11:46 AM
daveneumann's Avatar
daveneumann daveneumann is online now
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 253
Default XP 22 - Stereophile Amplification Component of 2019

Congratulations to the Pass Labs team on winning the Stereophile 2019 Amplification Component of the Year for the XP22 preamp. I think it is a well deserved honor...although admittedly I'm biased!

https://www.stereophile.com/content/...component-2019
__________________
SF Stradivari, Pass 260.8 amps, Pass XP 22; Pass XP 17, Raven One TT, Graham Phantom II arm, Lyra Etna, Airtight PC1, Transparent Reference, dedicated room 17 X 34 X 9
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-16-2019, 12:21 PM
TommyTunes TommyTunes is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 67
Default

Wait till they hear the XP-32
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-16-2019, 01:55 PM
JoeN's Avatar
JoeN JoeN is offline
Jazz Junkie

 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 97
Default

Another Great Pass product!!! Congrats Pass Labs.
__________________
Sincerely,

Jazz Junkie
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-16-2019, 01:58 PM
Puma Cat's Avatar
Puma Cat Puma Cat is online now
conrad-johnson, baby!


 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: East Bay, CA
Posts: 8,640
Default

Hmm. I wondered why Stereophile hardly ever reviews preamps anymore...I have to admit I don't understand their "thinking process" much of the time.
__________________
conrad-johnson CT-5 and LP70S, Michell Gyro SE MkII, SME V, Koetsu Urushi Vermilion w/ EAR324, Oppo BD-83SE, Sonore OpticalModule with Uptone Audio LPS-1.2 power supply, SOtM UltraNeo with Keces P3 power supply, Shunyata Alpha USB cable, Schiit Gungnir Multibit Gen 5 USB DAC, Schiit Loki DSD DAC, Mac Mini/Roon, Dynaudio Contour S3.4 with Esotar 2 tweeters, REL R-305, Audioquest Colombia and Colorado ICs, Shunyata Venom speaker cables, Shunyata Zitron Cobra and Black Mamba CX and Venom 3 power cords, Shunyata Triton, Synergistics Research HFT acoustical tuning devices
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-16-2019, 04:11 PM
Antonmb's Avatar
Antonmb Antonmb is online now
Senior Member


 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Northwest Washington (Mt Baker foothills)
Posts: 6,487
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Puma Cat View Post
Hmm. I wondered why Stereophile hardly ever reviews preamps anymore...I have to admit I don't understand their "thinking process" much of the time.


You prompted me to check. There are 8 preamps in their recommended components list that were reviewed in the last two years, including two Pass models. Given that the trend these days seems to be to eschew preamps in favor of integrated amps, all-in-ones, or digital sources direct to amps, this doesn’t seem unreasonable to me.
__________________
Tony
"Have you seen the stars tonight?"
________________________________
Main system: Linn Klimax Katalyst DSM; D’Agostino Momentum S250 amp & HD preamp; Rega RP10 w/Rega Aphelion; Boulder 508; Sonus Faber Amati Futura; Shunyata Denali 6000T, Alpha NR & EF power, Ztron Cobra IC & SC; Quadraspire Sunoko-Vent T, ISOAcoustics Orea footers, HRS Damping Plates; SonicTransporter i7 & Synology DS412+; Audio Desk Pro
Personal audio: Woo Audio WA6, WA7 & WA8; Auralic Aries Mini, Sonore MicroRendu & UltraRendu; AKG Q701, Shure SE535, Shure SH1540, Westone ES50 Custom, Sennheiser HD820, MrSpeakers Aeon Flow C; Various Moon Audio dragons
2nd system: Luxman SQ-N100, Sonus Faber Minima Amator II, REL T-5, refurbished AR XA w/Nagaoka MP-200 & VPI cabling, Linn Klimax DSM Renew, Shunyata Venom PS8 w/Defender & Viper, Nordost Blue Heaven power & IC, Shunyata Venom sc, Symposium Svelte Shelves
Workshop: Vintage Yamaha CA-1010 amp & CT-1010 tuner, Martin Logan Motion 4, Squeezebox Touch, Schiit BiFrost, AZ & WW cables
Video: Sony XBR65X850C; Apple TV-4; Vienna Acoustics Schönberg L/R, Webern center & surrounds; REL T1/T2/T3 subs; Arcam AVR850; Cambridge Audio 752BD; MIT-EXP SC
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-16-2019, 04:20 PM
Puma Cat's Avatar
Puma Cat Puma Cat is online now
conrad-johnson, baby!


 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: East Bay, CA
Posts: 8,640
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antonmb View Post
You prompted me to check. There are 8 preamps in their recommended components list that were reviewed in the last two years, including two Pass models. Given that the trend these days seems to be to eschew preamps in favor of integrated amps, all-in-ones, or digital sources direct to amps, this doesn’t seem unreasonable to me.
Okay, thanks for checking, Tony. So, on average, that's about a preamp review every quarter.

I'm still of classically-held view the preamp is the heart of a system; and also of the view that the majority of digital-only systems, even if they can be connected directly to an amp and speakers, invariably sounds better when going through a preamp.
__________________
conrad-johnson CT-5 and LP70S, Michell Gyro SE MkII, SME V, Koetsu Urushi Vermilion w/ EAR324, Oppo BD-83SE, Sonore OpticalModule with Uptone Audio LPS-1.2 power supply, SOtM UltraNeo with Keces P3 power supply, Shunyata Alpha USB cable, Schiit Gungnir Multibit Gen 5 USB DAC, Schiit Loki DSD DAC, Mac Mini/Roon, Dynaudio Contour S3.4 with Esotar 2 tweeters, REL R-305, Audioquest Colombia and Colorado ICs, Shunyata Venom speaker cables, Shunyata Zitron Cobra and Black Mamba CX and Venom 3 power cords, Shunyata Triton, Synergistics Research HFT acoustical tuning devices
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-16-2019, 09:13 PM
Antonmb's Avatar
Antonmb Antonmb is online now
Senior Member


 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Northwest Washington (Mt Baker foothills)
Posts: 6,487
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Puma Cat View Post



I'm still of classically-held view the preamp is the heart of a system; and also of the view that the majority of digital-only systems, even if they can be connected directly to an amp and speakers, invariably sounds better when going through a preamp.

Oh, I agree 100% - been there, done that, with my Linn streamer feeding an amp direct. Adding the D’ag preamp made a big difference. I was just pointing out what I think is a growing trend away from preamps and towards digital-direct, integrateds, etc. - more lifestyle products.
__________________
Tony
"Have you seen the stars tonight?"
________________________________
Main system: Linn Klimax Katalyst DSM; D’Agostino Momentum S250 amp & HD preamp; Rega RP10 w/Rega Aphelion; Boulder 508; Sonus Faber Amati Futura; Shunyata Denali 6000T, Alpha NR & EF power, Ztron Cobra IC & SC; Quadraspire Sunoko-Vent T, ISOAcoustics Orea footers, HRS Damping Plates; SonicTransporter i7 & Synology DS412+; Audio Desk Pro
Personal audio: Woo Audio WA6, WA7 & WA8; Auralic Aries Mini, Sonore MicroRendu & UltraRendu; AKG Q701, Shure SE535, Shure SH1540, Westone ES50 Custom, Sennheiser HD820, MrSpeakers Aeon Flow C; Various Moon Audio dragons
2nd system: Luxman SQ-N100, Sonus Faber Minima Amator II, REL T-5, refurbished AR XA w/Nagaoka MP-200 & VPI cabling, Linn Klimax DSM Renew, Shunyata Venom PS8 w/Defender & Viper, Nordost Blue Heaven power & IC, Shunyata Venom sc, Symposium Svelte Shelves
Workshop: Vintage Yamaha CA-1010 amp & CT-1010 tuner, Martin Logan Motion 4, Squeezebox Touch, Schiit BiFrost, AZ & WW cables
Video: Sony XBR65X850C; Apple TV-4; Vienna Acoustics Schönberg L/R, Webern center & surrounds; REL T1/T2/T3 subs; Arcam AVR850; Cambridge Audio 752BD; MIT-EXP SC
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-17-2019, 09:57 AM
SteveJ's Avatar
SteveJ SteveJ is offline
EMI guy
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Dayton, OH/Rockford, IL
Posts: 64
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daveneumann View Post
Congratulations to the Pass Labs team on winning the Stereophile 2019 Amplification Component of the Year for the XP22 preamp. I think it is a well deserved honor...although admittedly I'm biased!
I second the motion!

Disclosure, as if no one already knows. LOL Unabashed fan and owner of Pass Labs equipment, both commercial off the shelf and DIY.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Puma Cat View Post

I'm still of classically-held view the preamp is the heart of a system; and also of the view that the majority of digital-only systems, even if they can be connected directly to an amp and speakers, invariably sounds better when going through a preamp.
As am I. I view the change in the ratio of reviews of separates systems to integrateds similar to the unfortunate trend of abandoning stereo systems in favor of home theater. The publications and writers are simply following or perhaps leading, the trend.

Stereo systems and home theater systems are two different applications. You would not expect your Ferrari to perform as well as your 4 wheel truck well off road and the Ferrari would have an advantage at the Nureburgring.

At present we do not have the technology to completely control electromagnetic effects. You can have all the mumetal, shielding, doghouses, twisted shielded and balanced wiring you want. Isolation achieved by physical distance is always better. This is the reason for separate power supplies of Pass Labs preamps.

The trend toward integrateds and all-in-ones, if there is one, is the third great tragedy in Hi-Fi evolution, the first being the virtual abandonment of analog recording. If as much effort had been put into the development and advancement of analog recording as has been diverted to the development of digital recording we would be in a much better place although I do hold out hope that digital recording can someday be improved to the point that it no longer degrades the original performance.

Hi-Fi has mostly recovered from the Home Theater debacle which resulted in the abandonment of many fine opportunities to audition equipment in local dealers, and there are a delightful selection of alternatives to the integration misadventure but will sadly never recover from the digitization debacle.

One of the greatest things about this forum is the reverence for separates systems. An appreciation for analog being another.

Last edited by SteveJ; 11-17-2019 at 11:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-17-2019, 03:54 PM
JoeN's Avatar
JoeN JoeN is offline
Jazz Junkie

 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 97
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveJ View Post
I second the motion!

Disclosure, as if no one already knows. LOL Unabashed fan and owner of Pass Labs equipment, both commercial off the shelf and DIY.



As am I. I view the change in the ratio of reviews of separates systems to integrateds similar to the unfortunate trend of abandoning stereo systems in favor of home theater. The publications and writers are simply following or perhaps leading, the trend.

Stereo systems and home theater systems are two different applications. You would not expect your Ferrari to perform as well as your 4 wheel truck well off road and the Ferrari would have an advantage at the Nureburgring.

At present we do not have the technology to completely control electromagnetic effects. You can have all the mumetal, shielding, doghouses, twisted shielded and balanced wiring you want. Isolation achieved by physical distance is always better. This is the reason for separate power supplies of Pass Labs preamps.

The trend toward integrateds and all-in-ones, if there is one, is the third great tragedy in Hi-Fi evolution, the first being the virtual abandonment of analog recording. If as much effort had been put into the development and advancement of analog recording as has been diverted to the development of digital recording we would be in a much better place although I do hold out hope that digital recording can someday be improved to the point that it no longer degrades the original performance.

Hi-Fi has mostly recovered from the Home Theater debacle which resulted in the abandonment of many fine opportunities to audition equipment in local dealers, and there are a delightful selection of alternatives to the integration misadventure but will sadly never recover from the digitization debacle.

One of the greatest things about this forum is the reverence for separates systems. An appreciation for analog being another.
Well stated - and great illustration!

The sales tide has changed since my last two-channel system purchase many years ago.

Hopefully my new system should be here by the end of the year. The journey has been rather interesting and I believe somewhat illustrates your point:

While I specifically stated I desired a two-channel audio system, the first dealer, who was very nice, tried to sell me on a high-end home theater system instead of a dedicated two-channel system, telling me it would be better and more satisfying overall. I listened, but

When that failed, he had me consider a rather high-end integrated system. While it did sound much, much better for two-channel audio, I wasn't satisfied - the sound stage, imaging, etc. were still lacking. With what the integrated was lacking, IMO, it was, but still wasn't two-channel audio "for me personally." But it was still exceptional and I did seriously consider it.

Only at the last did he try to sell me on a high-end separates. These were absolutely amazing in comparison to everything else I had heard in his shop! This is what I remembered from years ago. But why wait until the very last to show me the best two-channel system he offered (in my price range)? In my book, he should have reversed his recommendations and left home theater completely out of the mix.

Ultimately, I went with another dealer and IMO better equipment.

To my ears, the differences are substantial between separates and integrateds. When one can afford separates financially and space-wise, IMO opt for the separates. And I remain uninterested in home theater - we watch maybe 4-10 hours of TV per week, so a soundbar remains sufficient.
__________________
Sincerely,

Jazz Junkie
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:42 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2019 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Acoustic Sciences Corportation
Acoustic Sciences Corportation
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Accuphase
Accuphase