AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > Ayre

Ayre A new dimension of musical enjoyment

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-14-2012, 09:30 PM
psjl's Avatar
psjl psjl is offline
Audio Snoopster
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: 22° 16′ 43″ N / 114° 9′ 26″ E
Posts: 394
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ritmo View Post
They sure do a nice job with their designs and craftmanship.

Mike
Agreed!.....Ayre R-series gear are a thing of beauty......I love the look of my KX-R!......Philip
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-14-2012, 10:00 PM
dpod4
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Love the understated elegant look and fact it isnt the size of a barn. Reviewer's comments are intriguing as he had Bryston and Simaudio to compare and he still gave 1st place to Ayre. I think he is the reviewer who was into VAC amps and panel speakers at one point?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-15-2012, 12:44 AM
dpod4
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tima
Not a comment on the VX-R - Ayre makes good stuff - but this line from that review strikes me as pure BS: " ... tube amps, even the very best, aren’t as reliable as their solid-state counterparts."
Agree. In fact some would say tube amps are more reliable in the long run.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-15-2012, 02:16 AM
jax4736 jax4736 is offline
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Washington DC, Metro area
Posts: 456
Default

In my case, as I decide whether to go Audio Research, or move to Ayre "R" series, I'm pretty sure I want monoblocks. In the case of Ayre, I couldn't imagine setting for the VX-R at such a close price point.

I am amazed though at how good my V-5xe amp is with my current speakers, which are of a custom design. I suspect the V-5 might not fare so well with speakers like the Wilson Sasha, with the 1.8 ohm impedance dip in the midbass. Luckily I don't feel compelled to upgrade from the V-5, but I suspect there's much more to the MX-R's than just more power...
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-15-2012, 04:25 AM
psjl's Avatar
psjl psjl is offline
Audio Snoopster
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: 22° 16′ 43″ N / 114° 9′ 26″ E
Posts: 394
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jax4736 View Post
In my case, as I decide whether to go Audio Research, or move to Ayre "R" series, I'm pretty sure I want monoblocks. In the case of Ayre, I couldn't imagine setting for the VX-R at such a close price point.

I am amazed though at how good my V-5xe amp is with my current speakers, which are of a custom design. I suspect the V-5 might not fare so well with speakers like the Wilson Sasha, with the 1.8 ohm impedance dip in the midbass. Luckily I don't feel compelled to upgrade from the V-5, but I suspect there's much more to the MX-R's than just more power...
jax4736,

I've never tried the Ayre V-5xe amp, but I've demo'ed the Ayre MX-R monoblock amps with Wilson Audio Sasha W/P speakers (coupled w/the Ayre KX-R preamp, Ayre QB-9 USB DAC and Transparent Ref. XL cabling throughout), and at that price point, it's a hard to beat combo - I posted a couple of my comments here: http://www.audioaficionado.org/wilso...tml#post183897.

While the Ayre MX-R had no problem whatsoever driving the Sasha W/P's (the 1.8 ohm minimum impedance dip at 92Hz is a non-issue with the MX-R's), however, I ended up going for a pair of Dan D'Agostino monoblock amps, because I was looking for (lack of a better word) "oomph"/"grunt" factor, that is, I yearned for a "MX-R on steroids". With the D.D. Momentums, I found what I was looking for - I posted some additional comments here: http://www.audioaficionado.org/wilso...tml#post204922.

That being said, if my budget was much tighter, than I'ed also be perfectly happy going with an Ayre KX-R/MX-R combo driving my Sasha W/P's.

Then again Audio Research makes top-notch/superb sounding gear, so whether going with Ayre or Audio Research is largely a matter of personal preference - I believe you can't go wrong either way.

Philip
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-15-2012, 11:06 AM
metaphacts's Avatar
metaphacts metaphacts is offline
Lower Provo River, UT
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Springville, Utah
Posts: 4,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dpod4

Agree. In fact some would say tube amps are more reliable in the long run.
You might want to survey some dealers and distributors who deal with multiple units of multiple brands over a period of years. Unless the world has turned upside down over the past decade, the reviewer is correct
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-15-2012, 11:56 AM
dpod4
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by metaphacts

You might want to survey some dealers and distributors who deal with multiple units of multiple brands over a period of years. Unless the world has turned upside down over the past decade, the reviewer is correct
Unless I am mistaken tube design has a more straightforward simple circuitry and parts. I am not an engineer but I did stay at a holiday inn last night. Brighter minds than me can chime in.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-15-2012, 12:00 PM
Volks Volks is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: CANADA/ALBERTA
Posts: 4,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dpod4 View Post
Unless I am mistaken tube design has a more straightforward simple circuitry and parts. I am not an engineer but I did stay at a holiday inn last night. Brighter minds than me can chime in.

LOL i like that
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-15-2012, 12:02 PM
metaphacts's Avatar
metaphacts metaphacts is offline
Lower Provo River, UT
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Springville, Utah
Posts: 4,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dpod4 View Post
Unless I am mistaken tube design has a more straightforward simple circuitry and parts. I am not an engineer but I did stay at a holiday inn last night. Brighter minds than me can chime in.
I am telling you what it is historically and save the early days of solid state, always has been.

What it should be isn't what the reviewer was discussing.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-15-2012, 06:21 PM
skyblue skyblue is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by psjl View Post
While the Ayre MX-R had no problem whatsoever driving the Sasha W/P's (the 1.8 ohm minimum impedance dip at 92Hz is a non-issue with the MX-R's), however, I ended up going for a pair of Dan D'Agostino monoblock amps, because I was looking for (lack of a better word) "oomph"/"grunt" factor, that is, I yearned for a "MX-R on steroids". With the D.D. Momentums, I found what I was looking for - I posted some additional comments here: http://www.audioaficionado.org/wilso...tml#post204922.
Thats what I heard others say too. The mx-r's sounds fantastic, but.. they miss the oomph. Perhaps Ayre could start producing some 600watt monos?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:18 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video