AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > Krell

Krell Leader in Audio Engineering

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 11-10-2013, 06:08 AM
Mikeoz Mikeoz is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 211
Default

Steve is that with the 302e ? Are you using the CAST cables with the Phantom ?
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-10-2013, 09:45 AM
SteveK SteveK is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 103
Default

Yes, Wadia 381i > Phantom > 302e > SF Strad. Using XLR for now. 400e on their way in a week or so.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-12-2014, 09:44 PM
Scooby-Do Scooby-Do is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 2
Default

I'm deciding between the Krell 400e and BSC M5...any advice?
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 03-13-2014, 12:04 AM
SteveK SteveK is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 103
Default

It may be hard to get a direct answer to your question... I don't know how may people would have compared these two units. One thing I know is that Krell discontinued the evo line, so used market may be the only choice if you go with 400e.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 03-13-2014, 08:57 AM
POL80 POL80 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 14
Default

My dealer has given me the 400e and 402e to test in my system for 1 month.
The biggest difference in my set was: 400e has more bite in the low frequensities.Staging and drive etc, was the same with bought of theme.
For the mid and high frequency, there was no difference in my set, so I have bought the 402e, because I have a good subwoofer.
If you have speakers that have a difficult load, I would go for the 400e or 600e.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 04-28-2014, 04:54 PM
Adrian Molina Adrian Molina is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 28
Default

Hello, how are you I give my opinion, as I have a very long experience in brand Krell , more than 20 years ago that I use ! hear all the lines and almost all models, and the main difference that you will have between the EVO -402 and EVO 400E is always monaural powers are far superior to the stereo at all , dynamic, transient , and above all spatiality and better restitution of the musical event, from both of which are excellent, but the mono will always be much higher , the issue is that it looks more expensive ! I currently use a pair of Krell KAS -2, made ​​back in Krell of Argentina , with a pre Pass Labs XP -30, and Wilson Watt Puppy 8 and I closed recently, purchasing a pair of powers , which are in my opinion the best of the world, the best he 's played a couple of EVO- 600E , in my opinion, the progress achieving the mark in sound with this line , is truly amazing , compare to Pass, AR , and EVO- 600e are beyond belief ! are more extended musical powers, sweet , dynamic , and listen ! are as they say on their website , an iron fist with silk gloves .
For me the EVO line , inside are the closest thing to a Rolex , with all that that means !
I hope , helped to clarify a bit , you doubt these wonderful powers !
Greetings from Argentina
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 09-28-2015, 04:25 PM
yuhengdu yuhengdu is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 8
Default

How would a krell 402e compared to the pass labs xa30.8's sound quality? Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 10-16-2015, 08:43 PM
temptation temptation is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 34
Default

Hi Yuhengdu, previously i had the pass xa 100.8 driving my dynaudio evidence temptations, but when the 402e came in, it just bettered the pass, in every aspect. Speed, transparency, slam, soundstging, mid presence... thanks.

Last edited by temptation; 10-17-2015 at 11:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 10-16-2015, 08:54 PM
cma29's Avatar
cma29 cma29 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Columbia, Missouri, USA
Posts: 4,405
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by temptation View Post
Hi Yuhengdu, previously i had the pass xa 100.8 driving my dynaudio evidence temptations, but when the 402 came in, it just bettered the pass, in every aspect. Speed, transparency, slam, soundstging, mid presence... thanks.
Wow. Good to know. Thanks for sharing.

Last edited by cma29; 10-16-2015 at 10:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 10-18-2015, 08:57 AM
ct991 ct991 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by POL80 View Post
My dealer has given me the 400e and 402e to test in my system for 1 month.
The biggest difference in my set was: 400e has more bite in the low frequensities.Staging and drive etc, was the same with bought of theme.
For the mid and high frequency, there was no difference in my set, so I have bought the 402e, because I have a good subwoofer.
If you have speakers that have a difficult load, I would go for the 400e or 600e.
Given equal power, the mono amps will usually best the stereo version, especially evident in the channel separation and better bass control.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:29 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video