|
General Audio Discussion All other Audio Q & A |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
There is no such thing as a high resolution file
Turns out we have been doing it all wrong according to Bob Stuart. Throw away your high resolution DACs and get on the MQA bandwagon as soon as possible.
https://www.mqa.co.uk/newsroom/opini...0d7dy_s3uNWhiQ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
“...and line my pockets”
__________________
Main Equipment: Kharma Elegance dB11-S, JL Audio F113v2 X 2, Block Audio Line & Mono SE Amplification, Bricasti M21 DAC, Antipodes Kala K-50 Server, Clearaudio Performance SE. Satisfy tonearm & Maestro Wood MM cartridge. Power: Shunyata Everest 8000, Sigma XC v2, Sigma NR v2, Block Audio PCs, Defender, ADDPowr Wizard Grounding: Shunyata Altaira CGS - 4 X Alpha CGS cables, Network : Supra Cat 8+, Twin (Nenon) Modified Buffalo GS2016 Switches, Keces P3 LPSU, Cables: Wireworld Platinum 8 USB, Wireworld Platinum Eclipse 8 Speaker cables, 6M & 1M Tubulus Concentus ICs, Other:Two PSI Audio AVAA C20, Multiple GIK products, Stillpoint Apertures, Stillpoint Minis and Ultra SS, Three 20 Amp lines, Furutech GTX - Gold outlets, Adona Rack |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
By now, the OP has most assuredly heard MQA in his own setting - a pre-requisite for drawing a conclusion of any kind about the technology.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
We are not going down that road again, are we?
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
[emoji106][emoji106][emoji106] and lock everyone into the licensing scheme. Your music is only authentic if it’s certified by Bob Stuart.
__________________
Tony D'Agostino Momentum S250 MxV & HD pre; Linn Klimax Organik DSM, SonicTransporter, EtherRegen; Acoustic Signature Typhoon Neo, Koetsu RSP, Boulder 1108; Sf Il Cremonese; Shunyata Everest, Altaira, Sigma & Alpha v2 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
MQA sounds good to my ears.... my only concern is that it's basically more of an EQ thing (a cheat)... as it does generally sound a bit like the classic "loudness curve" has been applied to every recording I've heard relative to non MQA ones...
I'd say in reality .. it's Lossless > MQA > 44.1 > MP3 for me |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Why does that sound familiar with so many audio related concepts and products? The "dichotomy" seems to be that high resolution and upsampling has been exploited and abused by the industry and anyone trying to make a buck selling an upsampled version of the recording captured with CD level quality or less originally. Bit depth and upsampled rates became the new source of revenue as the CD sales slowed? So Bob offers us the MQA which he claims is better due to his super-secret-sauce algorithms and you better pay if you want to play. Not only that but the industry now should promote his idea over any other high resolution? Well, I am not going to argue that, let your own ears decide but as far as high resolution goes, the music recorded in high resolution with audiophile quality in mind from the start, will blow your socks off and there is not one thing Bob Stuart can add to that one. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
When something is recorded originally in 24/192, I want to play the untouched files (like via Qobuz).
Why would I want to listen to those files manipulated into an MQA file?!
__________________
Stereo: Hegel H590, Grimm Audio MU1, Mola Mola Tambaqui, Burmester 948 - V3 & V6 racks, Vivid Audio G2 Giyas, REL Carbon Special (pair), Silent Angel Bonn N8 Ethernet Switch & Forester F1, Wireworld Platinum Eclipse IC and SE SC, Furutech Digiflux AV: Hegel C-53, Marantz AV8802A, Oppo BDP-203EU, Pioneer Kuro 60", Vivid Audio C1 & V1w's, Wireworld Platinum Eclipse, SE & E Second system (veranda): Halgorythme preamp and monoblocks, Burmester 061, Avalon Avatar, Sharkwire & Wireworld cables |
|
|
Audio Aficionado Sponsors | |