#21
|
||||
|
||||
I would keep the 452 and add a Mac 2 channel preamp as mentioned above. I do recommend listening to a C2600 in combo with the 452 if possible before buying the C52. The combination of a tube pre with solid state amplification has proven to be revolutionary for some, myself included. I also own a MX122 and use a C1100 pass thru feeding 1.2KW's for 2 channel. You can always decide to its not for you and buy the C52. The MC601's are great amps, but right now you will get much more improvement in sound from a dedicated 2 channel preamp.
__________________
Regards, Terry Last edited by Azbiker; 12-14-2017 at 10:13 AM. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
I have a C52 and MC452 and I just love it. I liked the C52 over the C2600. Seem more dynamic but you can’t go wrong with either one.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
1. Get an SS pre-amp+DAC: C52 2. Tube pre-amp+DAC: C2600 3. Get a standalone pre-amp (C2300) and add/keep upgrading DAC's as long as I want But what about this fourth option: I only get a DAC and connect it to the MX122 and use it for stereo listening. I have no idea if this is feasible (whether the MX122 has analog circuits out). If it is possible, then I get to: 1. Improve my 2-channel sound 2. Spend less money (only DAC and not pre-amp and DAC) 3. Retain the ability to upgrade the DAC in the future if I wish to keep improving the sound. I apologize for my so many questions, but I have spent and am going to spend quite a lot of money, so want to make sure I know what I am doing. Thank you very much! |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
This was discussed on another thread regarding the need for a preamp in an all digital system. The elimination of the preamp will hypothetically allow for a more direct signal with fewer intervening circuits. Many have espoused this technique but many have mentioned a sterile sound with less body then through a preamp. My contention has been that the added circuits are beneficial to the sound by taking the impedance load off the DAC’s output, using a more robust amplifier to supply the amplifier and use a superior amplification technique (tubes). How could any volume control/amplifier crammed into a DAC or disc player equal a two box C1100? Often these are for convenience and are opamps not discreet stages. |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
My thoughts are that the MC452 needs a lot more time on it to open up. Also, try the 4 ohm tap after you have 100+ hours on the amplifier and give it a listen.
What DAC are you using again?
__________________
Michael 4K QLED|Aerial Acoustics|McIntosh D100 - MC501 - MX151|Bluesound|Schiit|Wyrd4Sound
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
I am currently only using the DAC on the MX122, so definitely not optimized for 2-channel listening.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
I agree that the best move would be to buy a preamp. A more economical solution than the C2600 or C52 would be the C47. It has the same DAC as the other two and if it has enough inputs/outputs to satisfy you and you don't have a desire for the redundant output meters, it would be a great first preamp for your system. Do a comparison between those three preamps on the McIntosh site and you'll see that the performance specs are virtually the same.
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quick question: if I buy a pre-amp+DAC like the C47, 48, 52, is it possible in the future to add a better standalone DAC and bypass the DAC in those devices? Or maybe I should get a C1100 and buy a separate DAC which is not a McIntosh? I wish there was a way to take all those components home and just try them :-) Thank you again! |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Great looking system you have comming together there Mr Gurt!
Quote:
Also, I'm pretty familiar with your older B&W speakers. They can be magical but require a lot of in home demo work to select the correct matching electronics. |
|
|
Audio Aficionado Sponsors | |