AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > McIntosh Audio

McIntosh Audio A Tradition of Excellence

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-14-2017, 10:10 AM
Azbiker's Avatar
Azbiker Azbiker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 148
Default

I would keep the 452 and add a Mac 2 channel preamp as mentioned above. I do recommend listening to a C2600 in combo with the 452 if possible before buying the C52. The combination of a tube pre with solid state amplification has proven to be revolutionary for some, myself included. I also own a MX122 and use a C1100 pass thru feeding 1.2KW's for 2 channel. You can always decide to its not for you and buy the C52. The MC601's are great amps, but right now you will get much more improvement in sound from a dedicated 2 channel preamp.
__________________
Regards,

Terry

Last edited by Azbiker; 12-14-2017 at 10:13 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-14-2017, 06:20 PM
rottikid rottikid is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 382
Default

I have a C52 and MC452 and I just love it. I liked the C52 over the C2600. Seem more dynamic but you can’t go wrong with either one.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-14-2017, 07:36 PM
Killergurt Killergurt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: California
Posts: 329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azbiker View Post
I would keep the 452 and add a Mac 2 channel preamp as mentioned above. I do recommend listening to a C2600 in combo with the 452 if possible before buying the C52. The combination of a tube pre with solid state amplification has proven to be revolutionary for some, myself included. I also own a MX122 and use a C1100 pass thru feeding 1.2KW's for 2 channel. You can always decide to its not for you and buy the C52. The MC601's are great amps, but right now you will get much more improvement in sound from a dedicated 2 channel preamp.
Thank you all *very* much for all your help and guidance. So I am going with a solution for 2-channels (not amplification at this stage). If I heard you all right, I can either:

1. Get an SS pre-amp+DAC: C52
2. Tube pre-amp+DAC: C2600
3. Get a standalone pre-amp (C2300) and add/keep upgrading DAC's as long as I want

But what about this fourth option: I only get a DAC and connect it to the MX122 and use it for stereo listening.
I have no idea if this is feasible (whether the MX122 has analog circuits out).
If it is possible, then I get to:

1. Improve my 2-channel sound
2. Spend less money (only DAC and not pre-amp and DAC)
3. Retain the ability to upgrade the DAC in the future if I wish to keep improving the sound.

I apologize for my so many questions, but I have spent and am going to spend quite a lot of money, so want to make sure I know what I am doing.

Thank you very much!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-14-2017, 07:41 PM
Msegal Msegal is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brownbear View Post
Can you expand on what you mean when you say the volume control on the D1100 is not of the same quality as any of the dedicated stereo pre amps?


This was discussed on another thread regarding the need for a preamp in an all digital system. The elimination of the preamp will hypothetically allow for a more direct signal with fewer intervening circuits. Many have espoused this technique but many have mentioned a sterile sound with less body then through a preamp.
My contention has been that the added circuits are beneficial to the sound by taking the impedance load off the DAC’s output, using a more robust amplifier to supply the amplifier and use a superior amplification technique (tubes).
How could any volume control/amplifier crammed into a DAC or disc player equal a two box C1100?
Often these are for convenience and are opamps not discreet stages.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-15-2017, 02:57 AM
Yamaki's Avatar
Yamaki Yamaki is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Apache Junction, AZ
Posts: 5,481
Default

My thoughts are that the MC452 needs a lot more time on it to open up. Also, try the 4 ohm tap after you have 100+ hours on the amplifier and give it a listen.

What DAC are you using again?
__________________
Michael
4K QLED|Aerial Acoustics|McIntosh D100 - MC501 - MX151|Bluesound|Schiit|Wyrd4Sound
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-15-2017, 10:24 AM
Killergurt Killergurt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: California
Posts: 329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yamaki View Post
My thoughts are that the MC452 needs a lot more time on it to open up. Also, try the 4 ohm tap after you have 100+ hours on the amplifier and give it a listen.

What DAC are you using again?
I am currently only using the DAC on the MX122, so definitely not optimized for 2-channel listening.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-16-2017, 10:20 AM
Killergurt Killergurt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: California
Posts: 329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Killergurt View Post
Thank you all *very* much for all your help and guidance. So I am going with a solution for 2-channels (not amplification at this stage). If I heard you all right, I can either:

1. Get an SS pre-amp+DAC: C52
2. Tube pre-amp+DAC: C2600
3. Get a standalone pre-amp (C2300) and add/keep upgrading DAC's as long as I want

But what about this fourth option: I only get a DAC and connect it to the MX122 and use it for stereo listening.
I have no idea if this is feasible (whether the MX122 has analog circuits out).
If it is possible, then I get to:

1. Improve my 2-channel sound
2. Spend less money (only DAC and not pre-amp and DAC)
3. Retain the ability to upgrade the DAC in the future if I wish to keep improving the sound.

I apologize for my so many questions, but I have spent and am going to spend quite a lot of money, so want to make sure I know what I am doing.

Thank you very much!
I confirmed with Mcintosh that it was not possible to connect a DAC directly to the MX122. The only route would be a pre-amp/DAC.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-16-2017, 11:07 AM
jayvis jayvis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 202
Default

I agree that the best move would be to buy a preamp. A more economical solution than the C2600 or C52 would be the C47. It has the same DAC as the other two and if it has enough inputs/outputs to satisfy you and you don't have a desire for the redundant output meters, it would be a great first preamp for your system. Do a comparison between those three preamps on the McIntosh site and you'll see that the performance specs are virtually the same.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-16-2017, 12:07 PM
Killergurt Killergurt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: California
Posts: 329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayvis View Post
I agree that the best move would be to buy a preamp. A more economical solution than the C2600 or C52 would be the C47. It has the same DAC as the other two and if it has enough inputs/outputs to satisfy you and you don't have a desire for the redundant output meters, it would be a great first preamp for your system. Do a comparison between those three preamps on the McIntosh site and you'll see that the performance specs are virtually the same.
Thank you Jayvis, I haven’t even considered the C47, I will do a comparison.
Quick question: if I buy a pre-amp+DAC like the C47, 48, 52, is it possible in the future to add a better standalone DAC and bypass the DAC in those devices?

Or maybe I should get a C1100 and buy a separate DAC which is not a McIntosh?
I wish there was a way to take all those components home and just try them :-)

Thank you again!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-16-2017, 12:17 PM
robd2 robd2 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 220
Default

Great looking system you have comming together there Mr Gurt!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Killergurt View Post
I wish there was a way to take all those components home and just try them :-)
This is exactually what I was just going to recommend. Do you not have dealers close by to work with? For reference I just finished up a search for a new preamp. I was able to cycle in at least 8 different preamps for extended in home demos. At the prices you are going to pay this should be considered a requirement.

Also, I'm pretty familiar with your older B&W speakers. They can be magical but require a lot of in home demo work to select the correct matching electronics.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:29 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video