AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > Audio Research

Audio Research State of the Art Audio Reproduction

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-12-2016, 01:01 AM
PlanarSpeakerFan's Avatar
PlanarSpeakerFan PlanarSpeakerFan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,564
Default ARC Ref CD-9 vs. Ref DAC

Has anyone had the opportunity to compare these two units? I auditioned the Ref CD-9 in my system a few months ago and it was the most analog sounding CD player I've ever heard yet quite linear. As I own a large catalog of high res. files, I'm also curious how the Ref CD-9's DAC stacks up to the Ref DAC.

Thanks,
Ken
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-12-2016, 10:50 AM
rscotth's Avatar
rscotth rscotth is offline
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Florida/NY
Posts: 1,364
Default

I've heard the RefDac connected directly to ref75se and it was amazing. Haven't heard the CD9. Since the RefDac is an older piece, and the new Dac9 just came out in the Foundation series, I've got to believe that a newer RefDac is on the horizon. Pure speculation!
__________________
Florida

Dan D'Agostino Momentum HD Preamp
Dan D'Agostino Momentum Phono Preamp
Dan D'Agostino Momentum M400 MxV x 3
Dan D'Agostino Momentum S250
dCS Vivaldi Apex DAC
dCS Vivaldi Upsampler
dCS Vivaldi Clock
Wilson Audio Alexia 2, Yvette & Mezzo
REL No.32 x 2
REL Carbon Special x 2
AVID Acutus Ref SP, Roon Nucleus+
McIntosh MX151, MVP881
HRS SXR Signature Audio Stand
Transparent Gen5Ref throughout!

New York

Dan D'Agostino Momentum HD Preamp
Dan D'Agostino Momentum M400 MxV x 2
dCS Rossini Dac
dCS Rossini Clock
Wilson Audio Alexia 2
REL No.25 x 2
Roon Nucleus+
Transparent Gen5Ref throughout!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-15-2016, 02:51 PM
Maxflo Maxflo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 43
Default

Ken, some times ago i had a chance to compare CD9 with RefDac (+ CD9 as transport) on the same system and both sound more or less the same. RefDac has wider range of features like streaming from the NAS. If you plan to have Pre from ARC on the level of Ref5SE it would be no differences, if you want to have system with higher level pre or newer one like Ref6 you can have better sound (maybe).
After the testing i bought RefDac, I am very happy and maybe upgrade it when REFDac MK2 would be available.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-15-2016, 03:37 PM
PASSFREAK PASSFREAK is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Bahia Blanca, Argentina
Posts: 217
Default

Hi Ken,
I read some posts from you earlier and i believe that you have a Esoteric K-01X right?
The Ref CD-9 is better for you than a K-01X????
Best

Pablo
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-15-2016, 08:20 PM
PlanarSpeakerFan's Avatar
PlanarSpeakerFan PlanarSpeakerFan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,564
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxflo View Post
Ken, some times ago i had a chance to compare CD9 with RefDac (+ CD9 as transport) on the same system and both sound more or less the same. RefDac has wider range of features like streaming from the NAS. If you plan to have Pre from ARC on the level of Ref5SE it would be no differences, if you want to have system with higher level pre or newer one like Ref6 you can have better sound (maybe).
After the testing i bought RefDac, I am very happy and maybe upgrade it when REFDac MK2 would be available.
Hi Maxflo,

Very informative post. Thanks so much! The way you compared them makes a lot of sense. I'm definitely leaning towards the Ref DAC now. I have a Ref 10 preamp. The two should go great together. I will take advantage of the terrific transport in my K-01X via its AES/EBU digital output if I want to listen to CDs through the Ref DAC, and continue to spin my SACD collection through the K-01X.

Thanks,
Ken

Last edited by PlanarSpeakerFan; 12-15-2016 at 08:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-15-2016, 08:30 PM
PlanarSpeakerFan's Avatar
PlanarSpeakerFan PlanarSpeakerFan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,564
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PASSFREAK View Post
Hi Ken,
I read some posts from you earlier and i believe that you have a Esoteric K-01X right?
The Ref CD-9 is better for you than a K-01X????
Best

Pablo
Hi Pablo,

The K-01X and the Ref CD-9 are different and each has its own strengths. They are different flavors. Sometimes I like vanilla and sometimes I like chocolate. The Ref CD-9's performance benefits from strong synergy with my Ref 10 preamp.

Best,
Ken

Last edited by PlanarSpeakerFan; 12-15-2016 at 08:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-15-2016, 11:57 PM
JBT JBT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lago Vista Texas Downtown Austin and Frisco Colorado
Posts: 2,017
Default

From what I understand the Reference DAC has been somewhat of a bust. I have the CD9 and it's not only a great CD player but also a great DAC!! One of ARCs best. IMHO!

Last edited by JBT; 12-16-2016 at 12:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-16-2016, 02:44 AM
PlanarSpeakerFan's Avatar
PlanarSpeakerFan PlanarSpeakerFan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,564
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JBT View Post
From what I understand the Reference DAC has been somewhat of a bust. I have the CD9 and it's not only a great CD player but also a great DAC!! One of ARCs best. IMHO!
Hi JBT,

I don't entirely disagree with you. From my conversations with owners, dealers and ARC, as a straight DAC, the Ref DAC works and sounds wonderful. However, as a network player, its functioning is anywhere from clunky to non-operational, depending on who you talk to. Those who are using a computer or music server with the Ref DAC appear to be extremely happy. ARC will have to address these interface issues with their 2017 update of the Ref DAC if they want it to be a success.

These are some of the reasons I'm considering the Ref CD-9. A CD transport that is uncomplicated and works and sounds wonderful. A straight DAC that functions and sounds great. No volume control that can't be defeated. That's what makes this a tough choice.

Best,
Ken
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-16-2016, 10:25 AM
enatai252 enatai252 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bellevue WA
Posts: 574
Default ARC Ref CD-9 vs. Ref DAC

Quote:
Originally Posted by PlanarSpeakerFan View Post
Hi JBT,



I don't entirely disagree with you. From my conversations with owners, dealers and ARC, as a straight DAC, the Ref DAC works and sounds wonderful. However, as a network player, its functioning is anywhere from clunky to non-operational, depending on who you talk to. Those who are using a computer or music server with the Ref DAC appear to be extremely happy. ARC will have to address these interface issues with their 2017 update of the Ref DAC if they want it to be a success.



These are some of the reasons I'm considering the Ref CD-9. A CD transport that is uncomplicated and works and sounds wonderful. A straight DAC that functions and sounds great. No volume control that can't be defeated. That's what makes this a tough choice.



Best,

Ken

I bought the Ref DAC right as it was introduced and used it in my study system up until about 6 months ago. The sound is the best I heard from an ARC digital product and I found that using it direct to amps and leveraging its high quality preamp feature provided the best results. The interface is however very poorly thought through and in the end....I decided to replace with a Rossini.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-17-2016, 12:50 AM
PlanarSpeakerFan's Avatar
PlanarSpeakerFan PlanarSpeakerFan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,564
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enatai252 View Post
I bought the Ref DAC right as it was introduced and used it in my study system up until about 6 months ago. The sound is the best I heard from an ARC digital product and I found that using it direct to amps and leveraging its high quality preamp feature provided the best results. The interface is however very poorly thought through and in the end....I decided to replace with a Rossini.
Thanks for your comments. What preamp were you bypassing when you made the determination that the Ref DAC sounded superior running directly to the amps? What are the rest of the components in your system?

I own the ARC Ref 10 preamp and it would be a major negative if I found this to be the case in my system (Vandersteen 7 mono amps and speakers). I would question the redundancy and sonic degradation caused by the Ref DAC's volume control, which cannot be defeated, used in conjunction with a top notch preamp. I would probably purchase the Ref CD-9 instead of the Ref DAC if I found this to be the case with the Ref 10 preamp in my system.

Best,
Ken

Last edited by PlanarSpeakerFan; 12-17-2016 at 12:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video