Shunyata Research Announces Everest

[CGabriel]

[SCAudiophile]

Originally Posted by CGabriel

Great post!

[crion2]

3) Why not using 10 VTX-Ag wiring?
Thanks
There are technical reasons having to do with the coaxial design of the VTX-Ag wiring.

Originally Posted by CGabriel

There are technical reasons having to do with the coaxial design of the VTX-Ag wiring.

Ok, this got me intrigued VTX-Ag, center core Ag, outer core Cu. Smaller strands when looking at the pictures.

I think I saw some hollow VTX wiring for a PD way back and much larger "strands" were used. Hypothetically would it be totally out of the question to just go Ag on every third "strand" of say a PD's VTX conductor? If there was 24 VTX conductors in a VTX cable, 8 of them could be Ag. Then the center would be hollow again?

Sorry, just curious.

[va23]

Originally Posted by CGabriel

Because the Monolithic case that it is designed around has 6 zones. To have more zones would necessitate doubling the size of the case and would result in 12 zones.



Yes, and the only one that has it.



There are technical reasons having to do with the coaxial design of the VTX-Ag wiring.

Thank you for your answers. Some more questions.

1) How is Cmode filter different from NIC?
2) Is the size of QR/BB in Everest the same as that in Tritron V3?
3) Will there be more benefits to use Typhon v3 together with Everest?

[CGabriel]

Originally Posted by crion2

Ok, this got me intrigued VTX-Ag, center core Ag, outer core Cu. Smaller strands when looking at the pictures.

I think I saw some hollow VTX wiring for a PD way back and much larger "strands" were used. Hypothetically would it be totally out of the question to just go Ag on every third "strand" of say a PD's VTX conductor? If there was 24 VTX conductors in a VTX cable, 8 of them could be Ag. Then the center would be hollow again?

Sorry, just curious.

That would be one way to do it. After hundreds of experiments, I am quite happy with the solution we have created.

[CGabriel]

Originally Posted by va23

Thank you for your answers. Some more questions.

1) How is Cmode filter different from NIC?
2) Is the size of QR/BB in Everest the same as that in Tritron V3?
3) Will there be more benefits to use Typhon v3 together with Everest?

1: They are completely different devices that solve different issues, so they are not comparable.

2: The QR/BBs in the Denali v2, Everest and Omega QR are new generation devices that are much smaller with higher levels of effectiveness. The Tv3 and TQR use a prior generation that are much larger. So the two generations are not directly comparable in “physical” size. That being said the Everest QR/BB is significantly more effective.

3: I think the Everest is very balanced as is. Just mate it to a great power cord like the Sigma XC or the Omega XC. Typhon QR is excellent when used to power amplifiers. If you have a Typhon QR I would use it for that purpose.

[va23]

Originally Posted by CGabriel

1: They are completely different devices that solve different issues, so they are not comparable.

2: The QR/BBs in the Denali v2, Everest and Omega QR are new generation devices that are much smaller with higher levels of effectiveness. The Tv3 and TQR use a prior generation that are much larger. So the two generations are not directly comparable in “physical” size. That being said the Everest QR/BB is significantly more effective.

3: I think the Everest is very balanced as is. Just mate it to a great power cord like the Sigma XC or the Omega XC. Typhon QR is excellent when used to power amplifiers. If you have a Typhon QR I would use it for that purpose.

Many thanks for your explanation.