AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > Shunyata Research

Shunyata Research Designing Silent Systems for recording, film and music

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 05-23-2012, 07:52 AM
GaryProtein's Avatar
GaryProtein GaryProtein is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 5,393
Default

I have lurked in this thread for a while. Bear with my being pedantic for a moment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tima View Post
Maybe, but doesn't the signal move much faster than the electrons?
NO, it doesn't.


Quote:
Originally Posted by 10Beers View Post
The electrons don't go anywhere. They merely provide a path for the signal to follow.
WRONG!. Signal transmission (current flow) is specifically defined by the (countable) number of electrons moving. One ampere is one coulomb per second = 6.24150965X10E18 electrons per second.


Quote:
Originally Posted by tima View Post
Right - but they do hop n bob around, though the signal travels faster. From a large enough perspective I suppose nothing goes anywhere.
WRONG again, see above.

Please see your Halliday and Resnick.

Last edited by GaryProtein; 05-23-2012 at 07:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-23-2012, 08:20 AM
tsv_1's Avatar
tsv_1 tsv_1 is offline
Genuflector
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Great State O'Maine
Posts: 726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryProtein View Post
I have lurked in this thread for a while. Bear with my being pedantic for a moment.


NO, it doesn't.



WRONG!. Signal transmission (current flow) is specifically defined by the (countable) number of electrons moving. One ampere is one coulomb per second = 6.24150965X10E18 electrons per second.



WRONG again, see above.

Please see your Halliday and Resnick.
My guess is that Tima and 10Beers are referring to electron drift velocity - that said, I agree that our current theoretical model of electricity dictates that electrons do in fact physically move - though in conditions other than superconductivity, their individual trajectory is anything but uniform.

Lurker II
__________________
Mains -> RSA_HZ-Crown-Jewel -> RSA_Dmitri -> Lessloss_DFPCs -> Olive_04HD+W4S_DAC2 / Oppo93 -> W4S_STP-SE -> Sanders_Magtech_Monos -> ML_CLXArt+Depthi(x2) -> Todd
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-23-2012, 08:36 AM
GaryProtein's Avatar
GaryProtein GaryProtein is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 5,393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tsv_1 View Post
I agree that our current theoretical model of electricity dictates that electrons do in fact physically move - though in conditions other than superconductivity, their individual trajectory is anything but uniform.

Lurker II
That is correct, but there is nonetheless, a mean (average) directional movement of the "sea" of electrons.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-23-2012, 09:50 AM
tsv_1's Avatar
tsv_1 tsv_1 is offline
Genuflector
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Great State O'Maine
Posts: 726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryProtein View Post
That is correct, but there is nonetheless, a mean (average) directional movement of the "sea" of electrons.
True for DC current... however, the net movement for AC is actually zero.
__________________
Mains -> RSA_HZ-Crown-Jewel -> RSA_Dmitri -> Lessloss_DFPCs -> Olive_04HD+W4S_DAC2 / Oppo93 -> W4S_STP-SE -> Sanders_Magtech_Monos -> ML_CLXArt+Depthi(x2) -> Todd
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-23-2012, 10:55 AM
GaryProtein's Avatar
GaryProtein GaryProtein is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 5,393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tsv_1 View Post
True for DC current... however, the net movement for AC is actually zero.
Yes, but there is net movement during each cycle of AC.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-23-2012, 11:12 AM
tsv_1's Avatar
tsv_1 tsv_1 is offline
Genuflector
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Great State O'Maine
Posts: 726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryProtein View Post
Yes, but there is net movement during each cycle of AC.
indeed... proportional to the frequency
__________________
Mains -> RSA_HZ-Crown-Jewel -> RSA_Dmitri -> Lessloss_DFPCs -> Olive_04HD+W4S_DAC2 / Oppo93 -> W4S_STP-SE -> Sanders_Magtech_Monos -> ML_CLXArt+Depthi(x2) -> Todd
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-23-2012, 12:27 PM
GaryProtein's Avatar
GaryProtein GaryProtein is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 5,393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tsv_1 View Post
indeed... proportional to the frequency

I'll let you have the last word for now so you can be the bigger nerd!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-24-2012, 02:47 AM
bzr bzr is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Hunter Valley Australia.
Posts: 2,492
Default

Wheres my foil hat mutter mutter......
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-24-2012, 05:28 AM
ehoove's Avatar
ehoove ehoove is offline
Old & New - Carpe Diem
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 5,187
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bzr View Post
Come on guys, don't turn this into another mumbo jumbo foil hat thread. We all do not listen to the same transistor do we, even though they are made of the same material. We are all made of the same material but look, smell, sound & perform differently too. Scientists insisted the world was flat, *explorers* didn't "fall off" so that theory was kind of ........
On the whole Graham I asked around of some people that are quite knowledgeable in the music industry in fabrication sales etc., about the sound characteristics you speak of & they have experienced the same phenomenon.
Well Stated, Thank you.
Regards,
Jim
__________________
It's all about the Music, but I sure like the way my gear makes it come alive!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-27-2012, 04:31 PM
Vhiner Vhiner is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by audiot servant
800 hours in and enjoying the zitron pc more and thinking about it less... just a sensational value genuine whole of system upgrade in a cable ... completely unreservedly recommended.
Graham,

I've had my Anaconda Zitron PC hooked up to my amp for about 19 days..10 hours a day of music playback. It's been a roller coaster so far....similar to what I have experienced with the Zitron IC's, SC's and digital interconnect. I was told the break in for the PC would be shorter but no such luck. At about 120 hours, I thought break in was over then it just tanked, got real harsh, highs were unpleasantly accentuated and now it's very, very forward, 2 dimensional and lacks mid range bloom....the same schizophrenia I've heard with all the rest of the Zitron line. So, would you mind descibing what you heard from 120 to 500 hours?

Vance
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:37 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video