AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > Sonus Faber

Sonus Faber Italy's Best

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 04-27-2013, 08:31 PM
junker junker is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Waikiki,HI | Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 1,402
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by metaphacts View Post
In a perfectly symmetrical room with perfect positioning, that might do it. Anything else, not so much.

Lasers are for tag
With regards to toe-in or tilt-back? My room isn't symmetrical that is why I also use the laser to adjust toe-in - to reduce reflected sound vs. direct sound.

IMO there is no better method to adjust toe-in equally. Then, just adjust equally, listen, and iterate until you are happy. Speaker optimization is definitely fun, and sometimes perplexing! By eye there is a problem from parallax since we have a dominant and recessive eye. Sometimes when I thought they were equally visually I could hear a L/R imbalanced and when checked I actually had them a bit off.

Metaphacts is definitely right about the way to adjust spikes mentioned earlier in the thread... I try to start with all spikes as low as possible, and only try to raise the front of the speakers. Mine only have one rear though, so I don't have worry about floor irregularities.


Last edited by junker; 04-27-2013 at 09:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 04-27-2013, 08:49 PM
junker junker is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Waikiki,HI | Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 1,402
Default

This is how Vandersteen suggests doing it with their speakers by hand... Obviously this would be different with your specific speakers.

The Vandersteen's really need to be aligned equally for their phase and time to be coherent and symmetrical to get that "planar-type" effect. When I asked Richard V., he suggested doing one according to the chart, and then using a laser to match on the second.

Anyway, good luck with speaker optimization! Probably no better upgrade IMO.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf tilt.pdf (36.7 KB, 27 views)

Last edited by junker; 04-27-2013 at 08:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 04-27-2013, 09:02 PM
metaphacts's Avatar
metaphacts metaphacts is offline
Lower Provo River, UT
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Springville, Utah
Posts: 4,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by junker View Post
With regards to toe-in or tilt-back? My room isn't symmetrical that is why I also use the laser to adjust toe-in - to reduce reflected sound vs. direct sound.

IMO there is no better method to adjust toe-in. Even by eye there is a problem from parallax since we have a dominant and recessive eye. Works for general construction and surveyors.

P.S.: And definitely in agreement with the way to adjust spikes mentioned earlier in the thread... I try to start with all spikes as low as possible, and only try to raise the front of the speakers.

First, adjusting roe in/rake by laser is in fact doing it by eye. Better way? Easy. Do it by listening and aligning the speakers acoustically. Takes into account everything in the room. Doing it by eye does not.

For Cremona, raising the fronts is the correct method. For some other speakers it can be the opposite. It is dependent on the overall physical wave launch alignment of the given speaker and where it is in the room. For instance, with the wave guide on the Sf Venere tweeters, the speakers tend to rake very slightly forward instead of back.
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 04-27-2013, 09:11 PM
metaphacts's Avatar
metaphacts metaphacts is offline
Lower Provo River, UT
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Springville, Utah
Posts: 4,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by junker View Post
This is how Vandersteen suggests doing it with their speakers by hand... Obviously this would be different with your specific speakers.

The Vandersteen's really need to be aligned equally for their phase and time to be coherent and symmetrical to get that "planar-type" effect. When I asked Richard V., he suggested doing one according to the chart, and then using a laser to match on the second.

Anyway, good luck with speaker optimization! Probably no better upgrade IMO.

Again, this does not take into account the effect of the room and positioning on proper toe/rake. It could get you close but highly unlikely to be precisely correct. Changing speaker manufacturers doesn't change that. Physics doesn't change based on logo.

x1000 on speaker optimization!
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 04-29-2013, 10:27 AM
aqualung aqualung is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by junker View Post
Sure. When you use a laser pointer on top of the speaker you aiming the top of the speaker but you want to aim (tweeter + midrange) / 2.

So what I did was to sit in my recliner and mark ear position with painters tape. Then you would want to adjust tilt so that the laser hits at your ear position + the distance you have between midway between your tweeter and midrange to the top of the speaker.

So for example say your ear position is 38" and your speakers have 12" from the speaker top to the drivers then adjust the red laser dot to 50", and you can pre-mark this with another piece of blue painters tape.

If you do it this way then you should be right on the money.

Let me know if this doesn't make sense. I could draw a diagram or something if that helps.
Yes, it does makes sense. Thanks. I am going to try this keeping in mind Bill's advice about aligning the speakers acoustically. The laser will get me closer than just using my eyes and then I will use my ears to fine tune and optimize.

I have a made a bigger impact to my sound with small adjustments to speaker postioning than I have with cable changes and tube rolling. Least expensive tweak you can do IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 04-29-2013, 10:29 AM
aqualung aqualung is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by junker View Post
This is how Vandersteen suggests doing it with their speakers by hand... Obviously this would be different with your specific speakers.

The Vandersteen's really need to be aligned equally for their phase and time to be coherent and symmetrical to get that "planar-type" effect. When I asked Richard V., he suggested doing one according to the chart, and then using a laser to match on the second.

Anyway, good luck with speaker optimization! Probably no better upgrade IMO.
Thanks junker. This is the kind of instruction I would have liked to have seen in the Cremona manual.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 04-30-2013, 09:54 PM
Rick U's Avatar
Rick U Rick U is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 404
Default

I just fine tuned my toe in with lasers. Great tool for aiming accuracy and insuring the speakers are symmetrical.
__________________
PS Audio P10, dCS Bartok, McIntosh C1100, Legacy Wavelet, McIntosh 452, Legacy Aeris
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 04-30-2013, 10:21 PM
metaphacts's Avatar
metaphacts metaphacts is offline
Lower Provo River, UT
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Springville, Utah
Posts: 4,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick U View Post
I just fine tuned my toe in with lasers. Great tool for aiming accuracy and insuring the speakers are symmetrical.

How's your rake?
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 04-30-2013, 10:57 PM
Rick U's Avatar
Rick U Rick U is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 404
Default

I've had the speakers all the way down and now all the way up. They sound better all the way down. I'm going to leave the rear spikes where they are and test them by lowering the front of the speaker 1/4 turn at a time. My speakers are not flat on top so using a laser won't help me aim the rake.
__________________
PS Audio P10, dCS Bartok, McIntosh C1100, Legacy Wavelet, McIntosh 452, Legacy Aeris
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 05-01-2013, 12:23 AM
metaphacts's Avatar
metaphacts metaphacts is offline
Lower Provo River, UT
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Springville, Utah
Posts: 4,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick U View Post
I've had the speakers all the way down and now all the way up. They sound better all the way down. I'm going to leave the rear spikes where they are and test them by lowering the front of the speaker 1/4 turn at a time. My speakers are not flat on top so using a laser won't help me aim the rake.
Neither extreme will be correct. I assume by all the way up, you mean front spikes fully extended and rear spikes all the way in. If so lower away

As you lower and it gets better you'll want to be more precise than 1/4 turn. Should also revisit toe to finish it off as rake is finalized.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:51 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video