AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > Pass Labs

Pass Labs 20 Years and Counting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-15-2014, 05:43 PM
Dave_72 Dave_72 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 673
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PlanarSpeakerFan View Post
Stereophile gave a little mini review on the XA-160.8 from CES.

Here's the link:

Pass Rises High to .8 | Stereophile.com
Nice! Thanks for posting.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-15-2014, 07:32 PM
BillK BillK is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 961
Default

Do they come with a dedicated backyard nuclear power plant? ;-)
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-15-2014, 08:58 PM
PlanarSpeakerFan's Avatar
PlanarSpeakerFan PlanarSpeakerFan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,564
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillK View Post
Do they come with a dedicated backyard nuclear power plant? ;-)
Hi Bill,

The XA-160.8 only draws 1,000 watts, that's 200 watts less than the XA-160.5. I would never go above the XA-100.8 because I wouldn't be able to manage the additional heat in my room. At 600 watts my electric bill and room temperature remain reasonable. Perhaps a windmill generator, much cleaner.

Best,
Ken
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-15-2014, 11:59 PM
FlexibleAudio's Avatar
FlexibleAudio FlexibleAudio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 188
Default

From Jason Victor Serinus • Pass Rises High to .8 | Stereophile.com

Quote:
one difference immediately stood out: the XA200.8 offers superior clarity in the low end, unraveling and illuming in natural light complex interweaving bass lines while at the same time delivering the additional and totally credible wallop that the XA200.5 transmits in softer and less impactful fashion.
"A totally credible wallop in a softer and less impactful fashion?" A somewhat curious statement. Two questions: a) isn't that a bit of an oxymoron, and b) if accurate, is that necessarily a good thing? Everything else Jason described sounds fantastic and this coming from a reviewer that owns the xa200.5's.

I wonder how long I will keep my xa200.5??? I have already talked to my dealer about setting up a comparison.
__________________
Paul
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-16-2014, 12:54 AM
cma29's Avatar
cma29 cma29 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Columbia, Missouri, USA
Posts: 4,405
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlexibleAudio View Post
From Jason Victor Serinus • Pass Rises High to .8 | Stereophile.com



"A totally credible wallop in a softer and less impactful fashion?" A somewhat curious statement. Two questions: a) isn't that a bit of an oxymoron, and b) if accurate, is that necessarily a good thing? Everything else Jason described sounds fantastic and this coming from a reviewer that owns the xa200.5's.

I wonder how long I will keep my xa200.5??? I have already talked to my dealer about setting up a comparison.
I see your conundrum

I'm already getting a quote to make the upgrade to the XA100.8s while I can still get 100% trade-in credit for what I paid for the XA100.5s.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-16-2014, 01:28 AM
PlanarSpeakerFan's Avatar
PlanarSpeakerFan PlanarSpeakerFan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,564
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlexibleAudio View Post
From Jason Victor Serinus • Pass Rises High to .8 | Stereophile.com



"A totally credible wallop in a softer and less impactful fashion?" A somewhat curious statement. Two questions: a) isn't that a bit of an oxymoron, and b) if accurate, is that necessarily a good thing? Everything else Jason described sounds fantastic and this coming from a reviewer that owns the xa200.5's.

I wonder how long I will keep my xa200.5??? I have already talked to my dealer about setting up a comparison.
Hi Paul,

The way that the sentence is written, I honestly can't tell if he heard the softer and less impactful bass is on the XA-200.8 or XA-200.5. It seems that some clarification is needed on this sentence.

Best,
Ken
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-16-2014, 05:00 PM
Sceptic's Avatar
Sceptic Sceptic is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sweden
Posts: 30
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PlanarSpeakerFan View Post
Sceptic,

The meter is HUGE on the XA-160.8.

Ken
Heard that the meters on the Point 8´s can be adjusted
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-16-2014, 06:22 PM
PlanarSpeakerFan's Avatar
PlanarSpeakerFan PlanarSpeakerFan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,564
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sceptic View Post
Heard that the meters on the Point 8´s can be adjusted
Hi Sceptic,

That's a nice feature. There are times when I listen at night with the lights down low and I really wish I could turn off those blue meter lights.

Ken
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-16-2014, 06:37 PM
PlanarSpeakerFan's Avatar
PlanarSpeakerFan PlanarSpeakerFan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,564
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlexibleAudio View Post
From Jason Victor Serinus • Pass Rises High to .8 | Stereophile.com

"A totally credible wallop in a softer and less impactful fashion?" A somewhat curious statement. Two questions: a) isn't that a bit of an oxymoron, and b) if accurate, is that necessarily a good thing? Everything else Jason described sounds fantastic and this coming from a reviewer that owns the xa200.5's.

I wonder how long I will keep my xa200.5??? I have already talked to my dealer about setting up a comparison.
Hi Paul,

Here is the paragraph in question from Jason's review:

"Auditioning one of my trusted reference SACDs, Ivan Fischer's Channel Classics performance of Mahler's Symphony 2, one difference immediately stood out: the XA200.8 offers superior clarity in the low end, unraveling and illuming in natural light complex interweaving bass lines while at the same time delivering the additional and totally credible wallop that the XA200.5 transmits in softer and less impactful fashion."

I've now read this paragraph about 20 times and I'm pretty sure he is stating that the XA-200.5 has softer and less impactful bass, while the XA-200.8 has an additional and totally believable amount of bass slam. This would match to comments made by Pass that the new XA.8 series has improved bass speed and response, which has always been a slight shortcoming in the XA.5 series, depending on whom you talk to.

Ken
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-16-2014, 11:06 PM
FlexibleAudio's Avatar
FlexibleAudio FlexibleAudio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 188
Default

Ken,

BINGO!......I think your read is indeed correct and it certainly tracks with all Pass announcements. Darn the upgrade is back in play. This is going to be fun.
__________________
Paul
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:23 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video