AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > Schiit

Schiit Designed For The Real World

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #33  
Old 10-15-2017, 07:49 PM
Soundmig Soundmig is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Colorado - Western Slope
Posts: 246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Puma Cat View Post
With all due respect to the folks at RMAF 2016, they might have been referring to differences using balanced vs. single-ended headphones as my guess they were presenting at Can-Jam (?).

I haven't directly compared them, but from the extensive reading I've done on other forums, the consensus is Gumby is notably superior-sounding to Bifrost Multibit (aka Bimby).

Some reasons are that Gumby uses a better Analog Devices DAC chip (19 bit) than Bimby and the closed-form filter it uses is identical to Yggdrasil's.

From Schiit:
"In actuality, it's a lot like Yggdrasil, using the same proprietary closed-form digital filter and precision multibit DACs. In this case, the DACs are AD5781BRUZ rather than Yggy's AD5791BRUZ, but there's still 4 of them for true hardware balancing, and they're followed by discrete JFET buffers for simplicity and excellent performance."

Bimny uses a lower-spec Analog Devices AD5547CRUZ chip, and the filter is not as sophisticated.

From one poster, who is a headphone user:
"Gumby is much more neutral to my ears. Bimby is on the warmer/darker/smoother/more gooey side. Even with Wyrd, Bimby is still like that compared to Gumby. The difference is enough that I'd be able to listen to a stock HD800 on a solid state amp connected to Bimby. That's how warm it is. It is a very euphonic DAC in that sense.

On that note, though, I'd still prefer Gumby even with my HD800, because Gumby gives much higher resolution, much better imaging, and much better soundstaging. The difference really is not subtle. Bimby tends to sound bit congested/compressed in the lower regions, and sometimes uncontrolled as well, whereas Gumby is always tight, articulated, textured, and detailed in those regions. Drums sound like a blur on Bimby, whereas they sound closer to the snappy, impactful, very slight but controlled rumble real life representation with Gumby. Or at least IMO, Gumby sounds closer to the truth with regards to instruments"


Hope this helps...
Puma Cat ... that's very helpful - thanks. I figured as much and was actually ready to upgrade to Gumby (from Bimby) but the Schiit guy said what he said which I thought was odd. I sincerely appreciate the information as what you describe with the Bimby is what I hear also and, good as Bimby is, I do want to improve the sonics.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video