AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > McIntosh Audio

McIntosh Audio A Tradition of Excellence

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-20-2015, 12:06 PM
o0OBillO0o o0OBillO0o is offline
Rebellious!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Massachusetts!
Posts: 5,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal Rubinson View Post
That's not what I was told when the MX121 was announced. There is a lot of Marantz in there.
Kal - if you look at M. Fremer's review, maybe relook?, he says words to the same effect.

Sent using A.Aficionado
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-20-2015, 12:08 PM
Mr_Sukebe Mr_Sukebe is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: London
Posts: 143
Default

I know this is the Mc area of the site, but you did ask about comparisons to other manufacturers aswell.
I home dem'd a Marantz AV processor (think it was a 7000 series unit about 18 months ago) against the fairly ancient Meridian 568.2mm (legacy processor, roughly 10 years old). At the time, I easily preferred the Meridian solution, which did surprise me a little with the online comments of "you've gotta try this new fangled xxx, technology has really moved forward".
Since then, the 568.2mm has been replaced by a Meridian 861v4, which takes things up another notch or two and is on par with any stereo digital source I've tried (e.g. the Linn Akurate DS streamer that I home dem'd a few months ago).

The 861v4 can be had for sensible money s/h, but be aware that assuming you want to process HD audio from BDs, you also need a second box called a HD621. They're not killer expensive, but you need to be aware.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-20-2015, 02:03 PM
TWiiii TWiiii is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Now live in the Southwest
Posts: 79
Default

I compared the MX150 and the big Dennon unit at the time and I found the MX150 smoother sounding, but it could have been the difference between the 207 and the Dennon amp.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-20-2015, 10:17 PM
doggiehowser's Avatar
doggiehowser doggiehowser is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,411
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rjryan View Post
Thanks for the clarification on the 8802. It may make the short list.

I completely understand the separate 2 channel thing. Just not sure I can do both. I had some issues with my present Marantz piece that I outlined in my other reply, so I think it's the next piece on my upgrade list.
In my case, the 2 channel route bypass adds only 1 component the stereo preamp

I still need the same speakers and power amps. Just that all my 2 channel stuff get hooked up to the stereo preamp's inputs. And my multichannel gear remains powered off when i listen to music.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-22-2015, 11:44 AM
rjryan rjryan is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mn
Posts: 262
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doggiehowser View Post
In my case, the 2 channel route bypass adds only 1 component the stereo preamp

I still need the same speakers and power amps. Just that all my 2 channel stuff get hooked up to the stereo preamp's inputs. And my multichannel gear remains powered off when i listen to music.
That would definitely be the ideal. Fortunately, I've got some time to ponder and demo. Who knows...maybe a two channel and upgrade to my Cambridge bd751 would be the ticket
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-22-2015, 08:02 PM
MichiganMike MichiganMike is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Michigan
Posts: 55
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rjryan View Post
I'm researching an upgrade for my Marantz AV 7005.
I use a McIntosh C48 preamp for my 2 channel listening and a Yamaha CX-A5000 preamp processor in my home theater. Yamaha uses a pair of ESS Sabre 9016 DACs for each of the eleven channels in the CX-A5000 and other design features to preserve the audio signal quality. The Yamaha is not a McIntosh, but in my opinion is worth an audition.

You may find the review at the hometheaterhifi web page interesting where the author compares the Yamaha CX-A5000 to his Marantz AV7005 in certain bench tests and his conclusions.
Yamaha CX-A5000 11.1 SSP (Surround Sound Processor) - HomeTheaterHiFi.com
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-22-2015, 08:51 PM
Kal Rubinson Kal Rubinson is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,588
Default

The Yamaha is a recent $3000 msrp prepro (I reviewed in 3/14) and the Marantz is an older $1500 msrp prepro (I reviewed in 3/11). It would be banner news if the Marantz was preferred.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-22-2015, 11:14 PM
doggiehowser's Avatar
doggiehowser doggiehowser is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,411
Default

I don't think the Yamaha is HDMI2.0 compliant though where the Marantz AV8802/7702 are.

The 8802 will also get a free update to HDCP2.2 compliance when that becomes available.

I am inclined to wait.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-23-2015, 08:31 AM
MichiganMike MichiganMike is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Michigan
Posts: 55
Default Yamaha CX-A5000 is HDMI 2.0 compliant with updated firmware

Quote:
Originally Posted by doggiehowser View Post
I don't think the Yamaha is HDMI2.0 compliant though where the Marantz AV8802/7702 are.
.
I performed a search on Google and confirmed that Yamaha offered a firmware update to make the CX-A5000 HDMI 2.0 compliant. In my experience, Yamaha, like Marantz, has been diligent about offering firmware updates for its flagship preamp processor.

I also appreciate the ease of updating the Yamaha by the internet connection. This is much more user friendly than the process for updating the USB firmware for my McIntosh C48.

Last edited by MichiganMike; 03-23-2015 at 11:43 AM. Reason: Added comment on ease of updating.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-23-2015, 10:58 PM
rjryan rjryan is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mn
Posts: 262
Default

These all seem like really great options, and I'm very grateful for all the advice! I actually had a Yamaha RXv 2800 prior to my current system. Very neutral sound. I've not had any experience with their Pre-pros, though. Others that I've glanced at were the Cary and Anthem.

Last edited by rjryan; 03-23-2015 at 11:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:25 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video