AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > Inspire by Dennis Had

Inspire by Dennis Had Enjoying Vacuum Tube Audio

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #3161  
Old 01-23-2017, 08:38 AM
FloridaBoy FloridaBoy is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 1,181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by x3workshop View Post
Mesa always spec'd very good quality tubes from, even from Chyna, in the early days so I'm not surprised to hear good reports on them in this forum and elsewhere.

Curious how soon the KT150 died on you? I've already put about 75 hours on these and they're sounding very nice.
Agree on the Mesa tubes. They are excellent performers. There is noting wrong with new production tubes. They simply need to be thoroughly tested.

I think the KT150 was damaged in shipment. The tubes were not very well packed. They have long filaments and they must be rather delicate. Unfortunately, I was working on the road and the return period passed before I used them.
Reply With Quote
  #3162  
Old 01-23-2017, 09:02 AM
Musica Amantem Musica Amantem is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 579
Default

While considering EL-34 possibilities (due to my amazing experience with the GL KT77), I found the following (hopefully unbiased) review. The author claims the GL KT77, Shuguang Black Treasure 6CA7-Z and even Tung-Sol's EL34 B to beat Mullard reissue EL34. The Shuguang, great as it may be, is too expensive!

http://blog.thetubestore.com/audioph...be-comparison/
Reply With Quote
  #3163  
Old 01-23-2017, 01:51 PM
FloridaBoy FloridaBoy is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 1,181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Musica Amantem View Post
While considering EL-34 possibilities (due to my amazing experience with the GL KT77), I found the following (hopefully unbiased) review. The author claims the GL KT77, Shuguang Black Treasure 6CA7-Z and even Tung-Sol's EL34 B to beat Mullard reissue EL34. The Shuguang, great as it may be, is too expensive!

http://blog.thetubestore.com/audioph...be-comparison/
From the review, "I do not belong to the Church of the NOS Mind; in my experience two of the least satisfactory of my 6L6s and 5881s are ‘Holy Grail’ US-made NOS tube from the 1960s."

I agree. The amps he used were single ended. He liked the Tube Amp Doctor 6L6/5881 too. The Treasure 6CA7's can be had for less but I'll stick with their KT66z.
Reply With Quote
  #3164  
Old 01-23-2017, 02:02 PM
Musica Amantem Musica Amantem is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 579
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FloridaBoy View Post
From the review, "I do not belong to the Church of the NOS Mind; in my experience two of the least satisfactory of my 6L6s and 5881s are ‘Holy Grail’ US-made NOS tube from the 1960s."

I agree. The amps he used were single ended. He liked the Tube Amp Doctor 6L6/5881 too. The Treasure 6CA7's can be had for less but I'll stick with their KT66z.
Yes, but the KT-66z, which to me is fabulous, is not that good in the mid-range as the KT-77, and probably the 6CA7z (which is supposed to be equivalent). But, the tradeoff is in the evenly-distributed presentation of the KT-66z across frequencies and its better bass management. Choices ... choices! Once one nails a winner combination which raises SQ a notch or two, it becomes addictive, wondering what is out there than can improve things further ... Man o man.

Yet another comparison on the EL-34 tube family (this may be somewhat biased): http://www.thetubestore.com/Resource...4-Review-Chart
Their conclusion (aside from their own "Preferred Series"), the Tung-Sol EL-34B is top dog, beating the GL KT-77 (which I question how can that be possible).

Another observation comes from Upscale Audio on the GL KT-77: "These tubes seem to take a bit longer to break in than some other power tubes, so if they sound a little lightweight in the bass, you have to give them time. Some guys are reporting at least 100 hours before the fully come into their own."

Which means the only drawback I've found on the otherwise perfect (for me) GL KT-77 (less than ideally managed bass) may not even be a drawback, after all. I'm certainly in the initial stage of this tube's burnin process, so I have hopes for the bass to redeem itself. There's some magic going on in the Triode-strapped Inspire amp with the KT-77/EL-34/6CA7 midrange I don't want to miss due to a weak bass. Even now, in its initial burnin phase, the body of sound is not unlike the KT-66z and Kinkless Tetrodes in general, so if that bass comes alive, I'll be done searching, I swear!

Finally, this experience makes me wonder why Dennis swears by 6V6 and KT 88's. I think he's inclined to the Pentode design's dynamics more than the "old man's Triode approach". This may explain what otherwise (in the Triode-wired units) seems unbelievable. In my amp, the 6V6 does not even compete and the KT-88, which is very musical, rythmic and with a full body of sound, is too bold in Triode wiring for it to really provide high resolution of the nuances which make the presentation so much more 3D and real.

Last edited by Musica Amantem; 01-23-2017 at 03:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3165  
Old 01-23-2017, 05:16 PM
FloridaBoy FloridaBoy is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 1,181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Musica Amantem View Post
Yes, but the KT-66z, which to me is fabulous, is not that good in the mid-range as the KT-77, and probably the 6CA7z (which is supposed to be equivalent). But, the tradeoff is in the evenly-distributed presentation of the KT-66z across frequencies and its better bass management. Choices ... choices! Once one nails a winner combination which raises SQ a notch or two, it becomes addictive, wondering what is out there than can improve things further ... Man o man.

Yet another comparison on the EL-34 tube family (this may be somewhat biased): http://www.thetubestore.com/Resource...4-Review-Chart
Their conclusion (aside from their own "Preferred Series"), the Tung-Sol EL-34B is top dog, beating the GL KT-77 (which I question how can that be possible).

Another observation comes from Upscale Audio on the GL KT-77: "These tubes seem to take a bit longer to break in than some other power tubes, so if they sound a little lightweight in the bass, you have to give them time. Some guys are reporting at least 100 hours before the fully come into their own."

Which means the only drawback I've found on the otherwise perfect (for me) GL KT-77 (less than ideally managed bass) may not even be a drawback, after all. I'm certainly in the initial stage of this tube's burnin process, so I have hopes for the bass to redeem itself. There's some magic going on in the Triode-strapped Inspire amp with the KT-77/EL-34/6CA7 midrange I don't want to miss due to a weak bass. Even now, in its initial burnin phase, the body of sound is not unlike the KT-66z and Kinkless Tetrodes in general, so if that bass comes alive, I'll be done searching, I swear!

Finally, this experience makes me wonder why Dennis swears by 6V6 and KT 88's. I think he's inclined to the Pentode design's dynamics more than the "old man's Triode approach". This may explain what otherwise (in the Triode-wired units) seems unbelievable. In my amp, the 6V6 does not even compete and the KT-88, which is very musical, rythmic and with a full body of sound, is too bold in Triode wiring for it to really provide high resolution of the nuances which make the presentation so much more 3D and real.
I honestly believe that personal preference is the biggest factor in 'the best tube' game. I simply prefer the 6L6/6550 type. I like the GL KT77 too it has a 3D midrange. I may have to try the Tung Sol EL34B..just because.
The Tube Store reviews were in guitar amps.

Dennis just may prefer 6V6 and KT88's. I'll try some 6V6's again soon.
Reply With Quote
  #3166  
Old 01-23-2017, 07:27 PM
Rosco65 Rosco65 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 273
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FloridaBoy View Post
I honestly believe that personal preference is the biggest factor in 'the best tube' game. I simply prefer the 6L6/6550 type. I like the GL KT77 too it has a 3D midrange. I may have to try the Tung Sol EL34B..just because.
The Tube Store reviews were in guitar amps.

Dennis just may prefer 6V6 and KT88's. I'll try some 6V6's again soon.
Dennis expressed a strong preference for the KT77 in the PSE.
Reply With Quote
  #3167  
Old 01-23-2017, 08:40 PM
Musica Amantem Musica Amantem is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 579
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FloridaBoy View Post
I honestly believe that personal preference is the biggest factor in 'the best tube' game. I simply prefer the 6L6/6550 type. I like the GL KT77 too it has a 3D midrange. I may have to try the Tung Sol EL34B..just because.
The Tube Store reviews were in guitar amps.

Dennis just may prefer 6V6 and KT88's. I'll try some 6V6's again soon.
I thought those belong to different families (i.e., 6L6/6550)?

The VA 6550 is another nice surprise: Less detail-masking than the KT-88 with almost all the good features. It is probably too soon to judge it as I have not listened to these for more than 4 hours and they may keep improving some.

As you can probably tell, I'm having more fun than ever with the Inspire combo!
Reply With Quote
  #3168  
Old 01-23-2017, 09:55 PM
x3workshop x3workshop is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Harlem
Posts: 251
Default

The TS EL34B is another nice tube. I've only run it in a PP UL amp, so I can't comment on what it may sound like in the Inspire, but it has sweet midrange and good bass control in that amp. Well built.

The amp in question was a Cayin TA30 with full Bizzy Bee mods. Able to run triode too, but never tried those tubes in triode mode.
Reply With Quote
  #3169  
Old 01-23-2017, 10:34 PM
Musica Amantem Musica Amantem is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 579
Default

Noted, thanks. I believe FloridaBoy will be trying those soon and I'm sure he'll report back.
Reply With Quote
  #3170  
Old 01-24-2017, 06:31 PM
pstrisik pstrisik is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Alaska, USA
Posts: 768
Default

I ordered a pair of new production GL KT77 given the chatter here. I'll be comparing to the Mullard EL34 Xf2 reissue and vintage GL KT77.

I like the lower cost of experimenting!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:27 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video