AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Audio & Video > Pre-Amps & Amplifiers

Pre-Amps & Amplifiers All Brands Welcome

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-14-2013, 07:57 PM
Grasshopper's Avatar
Grasshopper Grasshopper is offline
Aspiring Audiophile
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: My House
Posts: 1,263
Default Solid State Preamps Vs. Tube Preamps

So the upgrade fairy keeps knocking on my door and I keep thinking the missing link in my chain is a proper preamplifier. I've considered a Mcintosh C48 (which would likely replace my DAC as well and become a "one-box" solution), or maybe a C2300. I've been impressed with the W4S Dac2 as a dac and even thought I should look at the W4S STP-SE which could be had for $1400 or so used. Either of these would be used with my DAC2.

This has me thinking, Solid State vs. Tube.

I really like a detailed sound, 3-D exaggerated soundstage, but i really like dynamics and bass slam. My layman's understanding of tube equipment is that it tends to smooth out the music, where solid state may make a harsher sound (on either extreme).

I thought I'd pose this question an see what other AA members have to say about solid state vs. tube, and their personal experience. Also, if any have direct experience with either of the preamps I've mentioned and how they compare, I'd love to hear your thoughts.
__________________
Main > Aurender N10/N100 / Antipodes K50 > Aries Cerat Kassandra mk2 - Playback Designs Dream DAC > D'agostino Momentum HD > PS Audio P10 > D'Agostino S250 > Sonus Faber Aida / REL S812 Six Pack + 4 JL Audio F113 Fathoms > B&W Signature HTM > Anthem Statement D2v > Mcintosh MC205 > Focal 1000 (side surrounds) > Bryston TIW (rear surrounds)

Secondary System > Aurender N100h> AMR777SE > D'agostino Momentum Integrated > Wilson Sasha DAW
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-14-2013, 08:26 PM
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto Alberto is offline
Chief Toneologist
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 2,174
Default

There is no simple answer. For my ears, with B&W speakers (very revealing), a bit of smoothing from a tube amps would be nice. On the other hand, since you have B&W you might like very revealing sound.

If you listen a lot (several hours a day) a small amount of edginess in the sound can become an issue - especially with some recordings. I listen a lot everyday, so I am all tubes.

Alberto
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-15-2013, 05:23 AM
Alki's Avatar
Alki Alki is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 938
Default

This is a very individualistic thing. When I first got into this hobby I purchased a SS pre. After a few years I upgraded to another SS pre but had not given a tube pre an audition / consideration.

When I finally gave a tube pre a listen the decision was quite easy for me to make the change. Doubt I will ever go back to a SS pre again.

To my ears the sound from a tube pre is what makes me happiest. I now find a SS pre to sound harsh.

Just give each a listen and pick what sounds best to you.

Happy shopping and keep us posted on what you select.

Last edited by Alki; 06-15-2013 at 05:32 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-15-2013, 05:46 AM
Jerome W's Avatar
Jerome W Jerome W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,240
Default

Imho you should not base your decision on a particular technology.
Although I'm a Shindo addict and I love tubes in general, I am not a tube fanatic. If it sounds better fine. If not, I go SS.
For example I preferred the C45 to my C220 even with NOS Telefunken tubes, and I preferred the C1000P over the T. I also preferred the C48 to the C2300 with stock tubes. I find the C48 warmer and punchier and more musical !
If the music played by a given unit speaks to your soul, why do you care if it is tube or SS ?
There are great products in both technology.
__________________
There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats
Albert Schweitzer
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-15-2013, 06:19 AM
1KW 1KW is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Naples, Fl & Long Beach Island, NJ
Posts: 7,634
Default

I'm using a C2300 with solid state MC501 amps and have no listener fatigue. On the other hand when I used my mcd500 as my pre amp with the same amps I never listened for more than 1 cd or lp at a time. Now I can listen for 5-6 hours at a time
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-15-2013, 06:43 AM
prepress's Avatar
prepress prepress is offline
Semi-audiophile
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Brooklyn, by way of Nashville
Posts: 2,916
Default

From a semi-audiophile's perspective: I have a C2300, and coming from years of an ARC LS3 (solid state) I was disappointed with the sound in that it lacked the dynamics I was used to. The mid and high frequencies were great, more open, but the lighter bottom end proved to be a distraction. I replaced the stock tubes with Amperex NOS and that helped, but didn't solve the problem. There are JJ ECC083s tubes there now which need perhaps another 10-15 hours to be considered broken in, but my sense is that I'm close to what I'll be getting out of them. Last night watching Jeff Beck Live at Ronnie Scott's on DVD, I was actually beginning to consider trading in or selling the 2300 for something else, probably a C48.

Then the idea struck to try the tone controls. So I went into the menu and turned the bass up from 0 to 2dB (the range is +/- 12dB). BIG CHANGE. Things filled in, weight increased, and with no apparent effect on the mids or highs. On to Yes Live at Montreaux. Same thing. Things sounded like what I get from my ARC LS3, except more open mids. After the tubes have settled in more and I've tried various sources, I'll see what's what. The preamp I really wanted, the VTL TL-6.5 Signature, is out of my price range. It's a hybrid, with 2 tubes in the line stage and a solid-state power supply.

That being the case, if I were to move on from the 2300 (still not impossible, but less likely for now), it would be back to solid state, because I think the 2300 experiment has shown me how much I value dynamics.
__________________
SOTA, Grado, SME, Van den Hul, Gingko turntable setup; Pioneer Elite LD, BDP; Sony OLED TV; Magnum Dynalab tuner, antenna; MIT S-video cable; Pangea HDMI cables; DVDO video processor; McIntosh SACD, preamp, power amps; Telefunken Black Diamond preamp tubes; Kimber IC; Transparent IC, PC, SC; Mirage speakers; PS Audio, Shunyata PC; Audio Additives RCA caps; Furman power conditioning; Sanus: racks
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-15-2013, 09:08 AM
Grasshopper's Avatar
Grasshopper Grasshopper is offline
Aspiring Audiophile
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: My House
Posts: 1,263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prepress View Post
From a semi-audiophile's perspective: I have a C2300, and coming from years of an ARC LS3 (solid state) I was disappointed with the sound in that it lacked the dynamics I was used to. The mid and high frequencies were great, more open, but the lighter bottom end proved to be a distraction. I replaced the stock tubes with Amperex NOS and that helped, but didn't solve the problem. There are JJ ECC083s tubes there now which need perhaps another 10-15 hours to be considered broken in, but my sense is that I'm close to what I'll be getting out of them. Last night watching Jeff Beck Live at Ronnie Scott's on DVD, I was actually beginning to consider trading in or selling the 2300 for something else, probably a C48.

Then the idea struck to try the tone controls. So I went into the menu and turned the bass up from 0 to 2dB (the range is +/- 12dB). BIG CHANGE. Things filled in, weight increased, and with no apparent effect on the mids or highs. On to Yes Live at Montreaux. Same thing. Things sounded like what I get from my ARC LS3, except more open mids. After the tubes have settled in more and I've tried various sources, I'll see what's what. The preamp I really wanted, the VTL TL-6.5 Signature, is out of my price range. It's a hybrid, with 2 tubes in the line stage and a solid-state power supply.

That being the case, if I were to move on from the 2300 (still not impossible, but less likely for now), it would be back to solid state, because I think the 2300 experiment has shown me how much I value dynamics.
Thanks for the feedback. That is precisely my concern. I love the smooth sound of tubes, but I worry it will come at the expense of dynamics and detail.
__________________
Main > Aurender N10/N100 / Antipodes K50 > Aries Cerat Kassandra mk2 - Playback Designs Dream DAC > D'agostino Momentum HD > PS Audio P10 > D'Agostino S250 > Sonus Faber Aida / REL S812 Six Pack + 4 JL Audio F113 Fathoms > B&W Signature HTM > Anthem Statement D2v > Mcintosh MC205 > Focal 1000 (side surrounds) > Bryston TIW (rear surrounds)

Secondary System > Aurender N100h> AMR777SE > D'agostino Momentum Integrated > Wilson Sasha DAW
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-15-2013, 09:08 AM
Grasshopper's Avatar
Grasshopper Grasshopper is offline
Aspiring Audiophile
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: My House
Posts: 1,263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberto View Post
There is no simple answer. For my ears, with B&W speakers (very revealing), a bit of smoothing from a tube amps would be nice. On the other hand, since you have B&W you might like very revealing sound.

If you listen a lot (several hours a day) a small amount of edginess in the sound can become an issue - especially with some recordings. I listen a lot everyday, so I am all tubes.

Alberto
Thanks for the feedback.
__________________
Main > Aurender N10/N100 / Antipodes K50 > Aries Cerat Kassandra mk2 - Playback Designs Dream DAC > D'agostino Momentum HD > PS Audio P10 > D'Agostino S250 > Sonus Faber Aida / REL S812 Six Pack + 4 JL Audio F113 Fathoms > B&W Signature HTM > Anthem Statement D2v > Mcintosh MC205 > Focal 1000 (side surrounds) > Bryston TIW (rear surrounds)

Secondary System > Aurender N100h> AMR777SE > D'agostino Momentum Integrated > Wilson Sasha DAW
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-15-2013, 09:10 AM
Grasshopper's Avatar
Grasshopper Grasshopper is offline
Aspiring Audiophile
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: My House
Posts: 1,263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alki View Post
This is a very individualistic thing. When I first got into this hobby I purchased a SS pre. After a few years I upgraded to another SS pre but had not given a tube pre an audition / consideration.

When I finally gave a tube pre a listen the decision was quite easy for me to make the change. Doubt I will ever go back to a SS pre again.

To my ears the sound from a tube pre is what makes me happiest. I now find a SS pre to sound harsh.

Just give each a listen and pick what sounds best to you.

Happy shopping and keep us posted on what you select.
I will keep you posted. My brain is telling me to lean towards a tube pre. The other 1/2 of my brain wants the C48.

I heard the D100 in my system as a solid state DAC/Pre, and I quite liked the sound (in hindsight. I thought it was a subtle upgrade at the time, but looking back it smoothed things out "enough").
__________________
Main > Aurender N10/N100 / Antipodes K50 > Aries Cerat Kassandra mk2 - Playback Designs Dream DAC > D'agostino Momentum HD > PS Audio P10 > D'Agostino S250 > Sonus Faber Aida / REL S812 Six Pack + 4 JL Audio F113 Fathoms > B&W Signature HTM > Anthem Statement D2v > Mcintosh MC205 > Focal 1000 (side surrounds) > Bryston TIW (rear surrounds)

Secondary System > Aurender N100h> AMR777SE > D'agostino Momentum Integrated > Wilson Sasha DAW
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-15-2013, 09:13 AM
Grasshopper's Avatar
Grasshopper Grasshopper is offline
Aspiring Audiophile
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: My House
Posts: 1,263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerome W View Post
Imho you should not base your decision on a particular technology.
Although I'm a Shindo addict and I love tubes in general, I am not a tube fanatic. If it sounds better fine. If not, I go SS.
For example I preferred the C45 to my C220 even with NOS Telefunken tubes, and I preferred the C1000P over the T. I also preferred the C48 to the C2300 with stock tubes. I find the C48 warmer and punchier and more musical !
If the music played by a given unit speaks to your soul, why do you care if it is tube or SS ?
There are great products in both technology.
Good post! My system sounds great as it is, but I am missing the piece where it speaks to my soul. I do need to demo the C48, it's just tough to do as the "local" shop is still pretty far away. I also feel a little bad demoing a new piece, since I'd probably end up looking for a pre-owned one elsewhere.

Hearing others experiences is very helpful. Thank you.
__________________
Main > Aurender N10/N100 / Antipodes K50 > Aries Cerat Kassandra mk2 - Playback Designs Dream DAC > D'agostino Momentum HD > PS Audio P10 > D'Agostino S250 > Sonus Faber Aida / REL S812 Six Pack + 4 JL Audio F113 Fathoms > B&W Signature HTM > Anthem Statement D2v > Mcintosh MC205 > Focal 1000 (side surrounds) > Bryston TIW (rear surrounds)

Secondary System > Aurender N100h> AMR777SE > D'agostino Momentum Integrated > Wilson Sasha DAW
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video