Change order to McIntosh C22 instead of C47 ?

[MCenthusiast]

Originally Posted by Stahle

I think you are right about the other preamps all having DAC sections with the exception of the C22 and the C1100. My mind is pretty much made up on the C22 because it doesn't have a DAC. I also like the fact that all of the functions are right there in front and controlled by knobs and toggle switches rather than being embedded behind a multifunction trim knob, just my preference. I know some people prefer the sleek look of something like a C47 or C2600 with only the two multifunction knobs. I just wish they had illuminated the volume and balance knobs on the C22.

Given your prefrence for an external DAC, would you consider the C1100 and a D1100 down the line?

[jdandy]

Originally Posted by JWJW

This picture was my C22. Should have never sold it. I LOVE my C2600...but the C22 is something very special.

Jon.......I'll bet seeing that photo gave you a little ping in your heart. Hindsight is always 20/20.

[JWJW]

Originally Posted by jdandy

Jon.......I'll bet seeing that photo gave you a little ping in your heart. Hindsight is always 20/20.

Dan....It did for sure! It felt like passing my ex wife at the shopping mall. Lol, lol :-)

[scapa]

Originally Posted by Stahle

Had I not just purchased the MC275 VI right before you were selling your C22, I would have bought your C22.

They make a heck of a combination...

Love my C22. I appreciate it's blend of wonderful transparency and musicality and superb ergonomics each time I use it. And I use it all the time. The volume and balance are not illuminated, but it isn't something you really notice in practice, even in low lighting. And I would say there's much of a trade-off in terms of speed, detail resolution or even bass with the 22 over the 47 -- both dig pretty deep. Most noticeable difference for me is in the extra spatial depth afforded by the 22, and its way with voices and (especially) string instruments.

[jdandy]

Originally Posted by JWJW

Dan....It did for sure! It felt like passing my ex wife at the shopping mall. Lol, lol :-)

. . . .

[Captelee]

Beautiful!

[Lockheed Martin]

Get the C22, it is a C2300 with retro look, loudness control, lesser input. You can replace the stock tubes with some Mullard NOS, especially CV4004 and it will sound fantastic.

[MisterBritt]

Originally Posted by Lockheed Martin

Get the C22, it is a C2300 with retro look, loudness control, lesser input. You can replace the stock tubes with some Mullard NOS, especially CV4004 and it will sound fantastic.

It's funny you mention that. I too replaced the stock tubes with the Mullard NOS CV4004. I tried a couple others, including the very dear Telefunken ECC803S, and thought this particular Mullard tube the best.

[Josep]

Sometimes i have erotic dreams with a C22 and a pair of MC275

[ismelllikepoop]

Ended up sticking with the c47?