AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > Boulder Electronics

Boulder Electronics Transparent, Accurate, Fast, Rugged, and Reliable

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-10-2013, 11:17 AM
A.Wayne A.Wayne is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Front Row Center
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PHC1 View Post
Yeah, sure, the $115k is totally sane and appropriate! Who cares that it is more expensive than an Mercedes Benz S Class.... We audiophiles sure are a crazy bunch!
A bargain , i should order two.......
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-14-2013, 11:36 AM
Charles Charles is offline
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,241
Default

This amp reminds me of D'A's Master Reference mono blocks Krell used to produce. Those amps (each one) were the much larger than the Master Reference subwoofer and they required 240 volts. They were class A with a bias circuit and had an enormous number of Motorola output devices.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-06-2013, 03:47 PM
wizard wizard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 322
Default



Specifications

Continuous Power, Each Channel
Watts THD 20-2 kHz THD 20 kHz
900 8 ohm 0.0008% 0.0035%
900 4 ohm 0.0009% 0.0045%
900 2 ohm 0.0014% 0.0090%

Peak Power, Each Channel
Watts
1000 8 ohm
1650 4 ohm
2000 2 ohm

Equivalent Input Noise, 20 kHz BW 1.5 µV

Magnitude Response, 20 to 20 KHz +0.00, -0.04 dB
Magnitude Response, -3dB at 0.015 Hz, 200 kHz

Voltage Gain 26dB

Input Impedance Balanced: 200 KΩ,
Unbalanced 100 KΩ

Common Mode Rejection 60 Hz: 90dB, 10 kHz: 70dB

Inputs 3-pin Balanced
Output Connectors 2 sets of 6 mm / .250 inch wingscrews

Power Requirements 220-240 VAC
50-60 Hz, 300W nominal, 6000 W at maximum output

All specifications taken at 240 VAC mains Power

Weight: Amplifier: 355 lbs. (161 kg),
Granite Base: 86 lbs. (39 kg),
Shipping: 563 lbs. (256 kg)
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-06-2013, 03:58 PM
enit's Avatar
enit enit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,278
Default

Wow...

Sent from my iPhone using A.Aficionado
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-23-2013, 06:56 AM
wizard wizard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 322
Default

Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-23-2013, 08:05 AM
Higgens Higgens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 1,117
Default

Just me, but I prefer the look of the inside to the look on the outside.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-23-2013, 08:27 AM
Still-One Still-One is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Milford, MI
Posts: 32,465
Default

That is impressive.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-29-2013, 09:19 PM
ILUVAUDIO's Avatar
ILUVAUDIO ILUVAUDIO is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Desert SW
Posts: 151
Default

I think the Boulder 3000 Series looks great, and who cares in reality what it looks like?? I thought audio gear was for, uh, an audio encounter?? Most of the audio crazies I know are like me, they do their serious listening with the lights low or off.....

Let's face it, there is plenty of ugly audio gear out there that probably sounds better than it looks....and is this not the point???

Finally, Boulder is keeping PLENTY busy selling the 3000 Series they build, so there must be plenty out there who thinks the gear looks just peachy

Give me a pair of 3050's with a pair of either Focal's Grande Utopia EM's or Wilson XLF's and I suspect one would have a jeans wetting experience!!

Cheers,
__________________
Classical Music Enthusiast!

Last edited by ILUVAUDIO; 10-29-2013 at 09:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-29-2013, 09:24 PM
Still-One Still-One is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Milford, MI
Posts: 32,465
Default

Why would you listen with the lights low or off?? That sure does't help the sound.

If it doesn't look good it sure isn't finding a place in my set-up no matter how it sounds.

Last edited by Still-One; 11-03-2013 at 11:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-29-2013, 10:12 PM
Bodhisattva
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I asked Dan why Boulder designed such massive, powerful amps & he told me the reason was mainly demand in the Chinese market for bigger, more powerful amps (seems to be a status thing). Boulder determined there was a business case, and the 3000 series was born. At the same time I think they realized their 2000 series (especially the 2010) needed an update (even relative to Boulder's normal product life cycle).

Last edited by Bodhisattva; 10-29-2013 at 10:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:49 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video