AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > Audio Research

Audio Research State of the Art Audio Reproduction

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-16-2014, 11:09 PM
TOGA TOGA is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: N13E100
Posts: 2,524
Default

Thanks you.
And I found these locally at half price of factory set of 6H30.
Should I take them? Ten of them. Non-matched, however.
Toga
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image-1871589292.jpg (50.2 KB, 13 views)
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-16-2014, 11:27 PM
Coopersark's Avatar
Coopersark Coopersark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 86
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOGA View Post
Thanks you.
And I found these locally at half price of factory set of 6H30.
Should I take them? Ten of them. Non-matched, however.
Toga
I wouldn't do that. I always have my 6h30's matched. As I remember there is a couple dollar premium per tube for the matching, but well worth it in sonic terms. Since the 6h30's only have to be replaced every 4000 hours, the extra $20.00 charge that you will spend for their matching is nothing when amortized over those hours.

Last edited by Coopersark; 01-16-2014 at 11:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-17-2014, 01:55 AM
tima tima is offline
Living La Vida Vinyl
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,404
Default

Fwiw, Electro-Harmonix and Sovtek 6H30s both come from the same place; they're the same tube with different labels. Both brands and the company that makes them are owned by the same guy. I would not pay the premium some are charging for E-H tubes.

The SED (Svetlana) 6550C 'Winged C' (which comes from their old logo) is no longer in production and what remains at retail have gone up in price considerably ($70-$100/ea.) If ARC is supplying these for their power supplies they stocked up on them. Otherwise the Sovtek 6550C is the option. (I thought at one point ARC was also using the 6550WE in the power supplies for line and phono stages.) If these were power tubes in an amp it might be worth paying extra, but for power supply, not so much.

Part of the reason a complete replacement set is more expensive from ARC (4% of the Ref Anniversary cost?) is the culling, testing, extended burn-in, and matching they do, but yes a slight premium. Choosing individually by yourself may save a little money but for these tubes you won't achieve better sonics - the 6H30 comes from a single source and is not like a 6922 or 6SN7 where there are significant differences in brand. Fwiw, sometimes you can negotiate for a replacement set at cost as part of initial purchase.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-17-2014, 03:00 AM
TOGA TOGA is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: N13E100
Posts: 2,524
Default

I realized A matched 6h30 should be used. But I am confusing about what kind of matching do I need.
And where to put each match set onto a board.

Do I need matched eight for pre amp chassis ? Or two sets of matched quad, and Do I put each matched quad for each channels. Or each rows from front to back .

Toga
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-17-2014, 03:30 AM
tima tima is offline
Living La Vida Vinyl
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,404
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOGA View Post
I realized A matched 6h30 should be used. But I am confusing about what kind of matching do I need.
And where to put each match set onto a board.

Do I need matched eight for pre amp chassis ? Or two sets of matched quad, and Do I put each matched quad for each channels. Or each rows from front to back .

Toga
The matching would be between the two sections of the dual triode - if you pay for this, it'll add about +$5 per tube. Think of the matching as a percentage of difference between sections. How close a match I cannot say, but under 5% difference is usually very good. Then ideally each tube in a matched group would have closely similar specs.

I believe there's a quad for each channel, and the matching would be per channel, so two matched quads. I don't have the board in front of me but the members of each quad should be grouped proximate to one another.

Odds are you will not hear the result of matching.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-17-2014, 03:42 AM
TOGA TOGA is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: N13E100
Posts: 2,524
Default

Tima , this is how the board look like. Left row are followers, right rows are amplifier tubes. Lower four are for one channel. Upper for other channel. So can you tell exactly how to place each group of matched quad? Thanks Toga
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image-1556700507.jpg (93.0 KB, 25 views)
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-17-2014, 03:47 AM
Harlequin Harlequin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 428
Default

Toga ,

I note that you have but recently commented in the 6h30 thread ~

http://www.audioaficionado.org/audio...tml#post569108

Were I to be in your position I would be giving serious consideration on ordering a complete set of cryo-treated EH 6H-30 Gold Pins from Cryoset whom it would appear offer a matching service at a most reasonable premium .

Jasper.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-17-2014, 04:02 AM
TOGA TOGA is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: N13E100
Posts: 2,524
Default

Jasper,
Stranged, but Ron from Cryoset.com replied a short email to me just a moment ago.
He suggested me. Cryo'ed Sovtek 6h30 rather than EH. I am waiting for his more detailed
Explanation.
Toga
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-17-2014, 04:35 AM
TOGA TOGA is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: N13E100
Posts: 2,524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tima View Post
From what I know of ARC board layouts, one matched quad would go in V1/3/5/7 and the other quad in the V2/4/6/8 sockets.
This is exactly what I am trying to get from this original thread. Thanks.
This means, there is chance of different gain between left and right channels in case both matched quad set a quite different?
But shops told me the variations on 6h30 are not great at all. Should have no issue.

Toga
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-17-2014, 04:44 AM
Harlequin Harlequin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOGA View Post
Jasper,
Stranged, but Ron from Cryoset.com replied a short email to me just a moment ago.
He suggested me. Cryo'ed Sovtek 6h30 rather than EH. I am waiting for his more detailed
Explanation.
Toga
Spooky ! I would be most interested in hearing more of Ron's thoughts on this Toga .

Jasper
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:08 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video