AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > The Lounge > General Audio Discussion

General Audio Discussion All other Audio Q & A

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 08-12-2014, 09:04 PM
djwhog's Avatar
djwhog djwhog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 7,021
Default

I think you can not compare, depends on the source, desire, application, room etc and of course the material and if 5.1 etc would benefit the material.

Apples / Oranges or maybe Steak / Veggies

Both work if used in the correct application, mine is like 85% stereo, 15% multi...
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-12-2014, 10:22 PM
AndyPandy's Avatar
AndyPandy AndyPandy is offline
A happy little vegemite..
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,292
Default

I just went through the exercise of costing out a 5.1 system vs Stereo, (had much fund auditioning) and found to achieve the same or similar level of performance in multi-channel was going to cost me a WHOLE lot more, and of course all my music is in stereo.

So have stuck with the stereo, as also being a more domestically friendly solution: my wife HATES wires around the place.
__________________
Best Wishes, Andy

Music washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life.

Berthold Auerbach
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-12-2014, 10:28 PM
cma29's Avatar
cma29 cma29 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Columbia, Missouri, USA
Posts: 4,405
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyPandy View Post
I just went through the exercise of costing out a 5.1 system vs Stereo, (had much fund auditioning) and found to achieve the same or similar level of performance in multi-channel was going to cost me a WHOLE lot more, and of course all my music is in stereo.

So have stuck with the stereo, as also being a more domestically friendly solution: my wife HATES wires around the place.
Andy - I have a two-channel set up and I don't feel like I'm missing that much. You should be fine with a stereo-only rig. What equipment are you considering?

Last edited by cma29; 08-13-2014 at 12:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-13-2014, 12:39 PM
Toccata Toccata is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 3,110
Default

I find multi-channel bigger and superficially impressive sounding, but if accurate imaging is important, then stereo is generally more accurate.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-13-2014, 11:10 PM
Kal Rubinson Kal Rubinson is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,588
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toccata View Post
I find multi-channel bigger and superficially impressive sounding, but if accurate imaging is important, then stereo is generally more accurate.
I do not agree with that. While it is source-dependent, the best mch recordings offer remarkable imaging. In comparison, the same performance in stereo seems narrow and constrained. For me, that is the major appeal of MCH.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-14-2014, 10:29 PM
mwjw mwjw is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 99
Default

Hmm...audio only in Dolby Atmos might be interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-08-2017, 12:35 PM
bart's Avatar
bart bart is offline
Life is beautiful
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Belgium
Posts: 19,867
Default

When I had the specialist here for room treatment, he said it is more difficult to do multichannel properly than stereo.
The sweet spot is smaller.

As you know, I enjoy both.
I'm a lucky guy, I love classical, and as Kal stated, there are a lot of splendid recordings in mch.
__________________
Stereo: Hegel H590, Grimm Audio MU1, Mola Mola Tambaqui, Burmester 948 - V3 & V6 racks, Vivid Audio G2 Giyas, REL Carbon Special (pair), Silent Angel Bonn N8 Ethernet Switch & Forester F1, Wireworld Platinum Eclipse IC and SE SC, Furutech Digiflux
AV: Hegel C-53, Marantz AV8802A, Oppo BDP-203EU, Pioneer Kuro 60", Vivid Audio C1 & V1w's, Wireworld Platinum Eclipse, SE & E
Second system (veranda): Halgorythme preamp and monoblocks, Burmester 061, Avalon Avatar, Sharkwire & Wireworld cables
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:00 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video