AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Turntables & Vinyl > Vinyl & Accessories

Vinyl & Accessories Food for the Soul

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 02-06-2014, 05:21 PM
AM123 AM123 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Toronto ON Canada!
Posts: 294
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dude111 View Post
NOT ON RECORD IT ISNT!!!!!!!!!! (Yes on the CD it is)
Yes it is 100% digital on vinyl.

Source Recording: Digital
Mixing: Digital
Mastering: Digital
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 02-07-2014, 01:02 AM
David.m David.m is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W9TR View Post
Brothers in Arms was one of the first albums to be recorded on a Sony 24-track digital tape machine. The board was a Neve 8078. The studio was in Monserrat - I forget the name.

So yes, 100% digital recording, and an awesome one at that!
I have read somewhere it was recorded to both analogue & digital tapes (as you rightly say it was one of the first major label recordings on digital).
__________________
Thales TTT-C battery drive, Thales Simplicity II, Lyra Atlas, RCM Theriaa phono, Playback Designs MPS-5 SACD, ASR Emitter II Exclusive + Battery Power Supply, Rockport Technologies Avior, Argento Flow interconnect & speaker cables, HRS isolation
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 02-07-2014, 01:39 AM
2fastdriving 2fastdriving is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,772
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W9TR View Post
Brothers in Arms was one of the first albums to be recorded on a Sony 24-track digital tape machine. The board was a Neve 8078. The studio was in Monserrat - I forget the name.

So yes, 100% digital recording, and an awesome one at that!
This backs up what you are saying: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brother..._Straits_album)

I personally don't think it's that great of a sound...seems like it's lost some warmth, kind of like Donald Fagen's Nightfly. Both amazing albums full of great songs, but both digital and lacking something IMHO.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 02-07-2014, 01:51 AM
Dude111 Dude111 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 314
Default

Yeah I guess it does! (It could sound better but now I see this,I UNDERSTAND WHY!!)

Quote:
The decision to move to digital recording came from Knopfler's constant striving for better sound quality.
Thats not the way to do it idiot!!

GUESS I MIGHT GET RID OF IT SINCE I HATE DIGITAL CRAP!!!!!!! -- I get records FOR A REASON!!!!!!!!!! (FOR BETTER ANALOG SOUND)


I THINK IT SUCKS THEY DIDNT SAY THAT ON THE ALBUM COVER!!!!!!!! (Its very sad they chose to ruin thier music like this)

Thank you guys,I am sorry I doubted you....... IT DIDNT SAY IT ON THE SLEEVE WHICH IS WHY I DIDNT REALISE IT!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:06 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video