AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > D'Agostino Audio

D'Agostino Audio Master Audio Systems

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-02-2013, 12:16 PM
kev313 kev313 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 613
Default Preamps?

Curious as to the preps everyone is using with their DAGs.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-02-2013, 12:19 PM
o0OBillO0o o0OBillO0o is offline
Rebellious!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Massachusetts!
Posts: 5,179
Default

I'm guessing you meant to say, "what preamps are using with your dacs?"

Sent from my iPhone using A.Aficionado
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-02-2013, 12:21 PM
mbovaird mbovaird is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,445
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by o0OBillO0o View Post
I'm guessing you meant to say, "what preamps are using with your dacs?"

Sent from my iPhone using A.Aficionado
No. D'Agostino amps.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-02-2013, 01:00 PM
joeinid joeinid is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 8,386
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbovaird View Post
No. D'Agostino amps.



Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-02-2013, 02:20 PM
kev313 kev313 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 613
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbovaird View Post

No. D'Agostino amps.
Right.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-02-2013, 03:04 PM
kev313 kev313 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 613
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by o0OBillO0o View Post
I'm guessing you meant to say, "what preamps are using with your dacs?"

Sent from my iPhone using A.Aficionado
But I DID mean to write "preamps"!!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-02-2013, 04:44 PM
turntable's Avatar
turntable turntable is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Downunder in Sydney
Posts: 1,774
Default

Using my cj GAT.

Tried ARC ref5se and the cj GAT was a lot better.

Bottom line, even thou the DAG amps are balanced input only, ultimately the better sounding preamp regardless of bal/se design will sound best.

What preamp do you have?
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-02-2013, 05:04 PM
cmalak's Avatar
cmalak cmalak is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,602
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by turntable View Post
Using my cj GAT.

Tried ARC ref5se and the cj GAT was a lot better.

Bottom line, even thou the DAG amps are balanced input only, ultimately the better sounding preamp regardless of bal/se design will sound best.

What preamp do you have?
Cheers
Shane....it should. The GAT is almost 1.5X the price of Ref 5SE I believe. Fairer fight would have been the Ref 40 Anniv vs. GAT (similar price points). Just saying
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-03-2013, 02:02 AM
doggiehowser's Avatar
doggiehowser doggiehowser is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,411
Default

I find that with a full balanced architecture from the XDS1 to ARC to my balanced power amps (Nemos only have balanced inputs), the gap is closed significantly with the CJ. The CJ has better dynamics but I thought the midrange lushness felt more apparent with the 5SE.
__________________
AcousSignThunderTA5000PurpleHeartNS WandMasterPearwoodII PSA DSD BHK ThielCS3.7SS2.2
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-04-2013, 01:20 AM
turntable's Avatar
turntable turntable is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Downunder in Sydney
Posts: 1,774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmalak View Post
Shane....it should. The GAT is almost 1.5X the price of Ref 5SE I believe. Fairer fight would have been the Ref 40 Anniv vs. GAT (similar price points). Just saying
Hi Cyril

My main point was we all get stuck on this is a balanced design, therefore only balanced need apply and visa versa. That was my thought as well.

Pairing a single ended GAT with a fully balanced amp might seem out of whack. Some may read my choice and just think, well Shane is a cj fanboi and does know any better
That is why I prefaced I compared it with the Ref5se to give some level of context.



Yes, the more expensive pre amp out performed the less expensive pre - that is not always the case.. To be honest, I was expecting it to be very close considering that the ARC is fully balanced, whereas in overall musical performance, it was not.

So for me, no need to change my pre amp.

When we are all looking at that next upgrade, we should be a little more open minded and look at the ultimate musical performance, not the topology of the amplifier.

Another classic example is Jerome using Shindo amps with Wilson Sasha - I bet many people said / thought Jerome was crazy and it will not work. It could not possibly be better than his 300 watt Mac tube amps. the Shindo amps sound wonderful with the Sasha's and comfortably outperformed the Mac amps, that he sold them.
Bravo Jerome for looking outside the box.

Last edited by turntable; 02-04-2013 at 04:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video