AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > McIntosh Audio

McIntosh Audio A Tradition of Excellence

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-09-2017, 02:38 AM
rodH rodH is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 49
Default Blasphemy to use "Tone Controls" on Mc Pre-Amp?

I have always thought it was a big no-no to use any type of equalizer on a receiver or pre amp or processor. I have always been taught that you want everything to sound as it should in the "flat" or no-filtering configuration because if you adjust something you are adding something to the system that is adding distortion, or altering the sound in a way that wasn't intended. I guess this is a very purest way of looking at things.

As I look closer at the Mc Pre-amps, there are often times tone controls for several different frequencies. I am using a Mc MX132 processor and B&W N804 speakers. Lately I have started to notice that at times the speakers tend to be a bit bright, and this is worse if the recording was done poorly. The problem is that the early N series B&Ws were sort of known to be a little more bright, but most people feel like the Mc is a great match since they tend to be so silky smooth. I haven't really noticed this a lot in the past, so I am not sure if it is my hearing is changing or maybe different music that I am listening to.

That being said, I don't have the funds to go out and purchase the new 804 diamond speakers that are supposed to be a little less bright. I have considered a few different solutions (replace my tweeter with the "signature" tweeter and see if that helps, make some changes to my Xover in the speakers, both of the above).

As I got to looking at more of the Mc stuff, I kind of got to wondering if I might try and turn my "treble" control down 1-2 db. Turns out that this lowers or raises the sound at 10,000hz. So I tried it (nothing to lose) and it seems to have tamed the tweeter a little bit. I am not sure if this is a permanent solution, as it might be effecting the sound in a negative way (as mentioned above) or if I should start pursuing the other methods to possibly "fix" it.

What is the general thought on adjusting these controls?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-09-2017, 02:49 AM
cleeds cleeds is offline
Senior Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,432
Default

If it sounds good to you, that's all that should matter.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-09-2017, 03:05 AM
2fastdriving 2fastdriving is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,772
Default

The idea behind this is that if everything is set up perfectly... Gear is high quality, room is treated, source material is recorded well... It should not be needed.

Of course nothing is ever "perfect", so tone controls help to deal with real world conditions.

I recommend that you do whatever you like, but think about some other things you might try to change the offending brightness , like room treatments. Maybe it's just a specific recording? Cables can also contribute to brightness.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-09-2017, 03:56 AM
IM3CPO IM3CPO is offline
Keeping it real since '75
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 286
Default

In a perfect world, I think your initial instincts are correct; you shouldnt need to adjust anything. However, we are in a much less than perfect world and I personally would never fault someone for using their EQ. Do whatever sounds best to you!

On the topic of switching speakers. Its been a while since I seriously listened to any B&W speakers, but several years back I seriously considered 802 Diamonds. I brought my own music, had the room all to myself, etc., and to me they were *very* bright... so much so that I went some place else and got Sonus Faber.. I am sure B&W had made changes in this series, but if you do decide to go down the speaker route you may want to demo some different brands. Sonus Faber and the new Wilsons (with silk tweeters) are ones I would consider if you want something more "silky"..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-09-2017, 08:47 AM
Yamaki's Avatar
Yamaki Yamaki is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Apache Junction, AZ
Posts: 5,479
Default

McIntosh realizes the reality of the real world and provided tone controls to allow you to control the playback and SQ to your liking.

Use them if you feel the need to. The only offensive behavior here is not enjoying your music.
__________________
Michael
4K QLED|Aerial Acoustics|McIntosh D100 - MC501 - MX151|Bluesound|Schiit|Wyrd4Sound
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-09-2017, 10:08 AM
Humbuster Humbuster is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: College town, foot of the Rockies
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yamaki View Post
McIntosh realizes the reality of the real world and provided tone controls to allow you to control the playback and SQ to your liking.

Use them if you feel the need to. The only offensive behavior here is not enjoying your music.
On the money. Proud Mac owner here, who uses tone controls.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-09-2017, 12:11 PM
Pampero Pampero is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Nashville, TN.
Posts: 548
Default

I don't use the program e.q. for room correction as a rule (with one exception) but it can make a marginal recording more listenable. Everything you listen to through your rig has been equalized at several points along the way. No exceptions to that since vinyl requires at the minimum use of the RIAA curves in both mastering and playback. If you have a subwoofer, you'll also have at the least a low pass network for it, and optimally, a high pass for the mains.

EQ is just about unavoidable in commercially recorded music, and if you like tape, you'll discover e.q. is used in recording and playback as well.

Without going to extremes of the definition, there really is no such thing in the audio world as recorded music that hasn't been passed through a series of frequency correcting networks. Especially true for pop music of just about every kind. Some purist recording may bypass any program e.q. during tracking, but eventually the raw product will succumb to some sort of treatment elsewhere in the chain.

Last edited by Pampero; 02-09-2017 at 12:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-09-2017, 12:11 PM
Randy Myers Randy Myers is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Nipomo, CA
Posts: 2,142
Default

Tone controls are and always have been personal preference. I knew people who were extremely proud of the huge a$$ equalizers with a billion controls and they would spend their time fiddling with the sliders....

To each his own.... I never liked what these controls did to the sound and have always enjoyed the "flat" sound much more. Therefore tone controls have never been my cup of tea. If a unit had tone controls and had a by pass switch it was always engaged for me. The equipment that I have almost always most enjoyed rarely had tone controls.

But again, to each his own. There is no right or wrong here.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-09-2017, 12:47 PM
JWJW's Avatar
JWJW JWJW is offline
Bun E. Carlos
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Snow, snow, snow......
Posts: 2,680
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy Myers View Post
Tone controls are and always have been personal preference. I knew people who were extremely proud of the huge a$$ equalizers with a billion controls and they would spend their time fiddling with the sliders....

To each his own.... I never liked what these controls did to the sound and have always enjoyed the "flat" sound much more. Therefore tone controls have never been my cup of tea. If a unit had tone controls and had a by pass switch it was always engaged for me. The equipment that I have almost always most enjoyed rarely had tone controls.

But again, to each his own. There is no right or wrong here.
Agree!
__________________
McIntosh Labs
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-09-2017, 01:08 PM
AudioGremlin AudioGremlin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Black Isle Scottish Highlands
Posts: 672
Default

Also agree!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:53 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video