#5191
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#5192
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#5193
|
|||
|
|||
That was my guess, thanks for confirming.
|
#5194
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#5195
|
||||
|
||||
The LP-3.1 is, according to Dennis, the next step up in the LP-3 line. If you're talkining about the pre-amp in the middle of that picture, I believe that's a prototype preamp using three 0A3 voltage regulator tubes as the second row of tubes. Straitwire can potentially shed more light on this.
|
#5196
|
||||
|
||||
You laugh, but my next build is a preamp with a center channel. Dennis was kind enough to show me a scheme for mixing stereo sound back into mono with a dual triode tube.
|
#5197
|
||||
|
||||
That's a tough question to answer, partly because I don't ever remember directly comparing the two. But keep this in mind. The 27 or 56 is a single indirectly heated triode, while the 6S*7 is a pair of indirectly heated triodes in the same bottle. The 6S*7 preamp, assuming it uses one 6S*7 per channel, gives the builder a second stage to play with, and it can be used in a number of different ways. I've never asked Dennis about the design/schematic of his LP-3 series of preamps, so I won't venture a guess what he does with that second section. I suppose we should look at having a shootout one of these days....
|
#5198
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I’ll bring my lp -27 SE and my upgraded lp-2 to lp-3a with Russian 6h1n. It should be fun. |
#5199
|
||||
|
||||
Well, you should have an opinion.....
|
#5200
|
||||
|
||||
I guess I do. Lp-27 is the best sounding IMHO though the difference b/w that and the lp-3a of mine is subtle. The lp-3a has significant more gain. Maybe necessary if running less efficient speakers. On the other side of same coin is the fact that both the 27a and 3a are not silent. Both generate a very subtle hiss. I recall my lp-2 being absolutely silent. No longer after the upgrade. Now this noise is subtle and not audible with mid-high efficiency speakers unless ear is right up on the driver. Now with high efficiency speakers, said noise becomes significant. Noticeable from across the room with no signal and sometimes noticeable during quiet passages. System synergy necessary as always. I would say the lp-3a was a significant improvement over my lap-2. Detail was much improved as I recall. It has been a while. But as with Dennis’ amps, the similarities are greater than the differences. All come from the same ‘ear’. So in the end I do think my lp 27SE has a slight edge over my 6h1n based lp-3a but matching with right speakers is necessary for both. I would look forward to a shootout since I have yet to hear anything from or about the 3.1 other than of its existence. And any excuse or opportunity to visit the Toy Factory is looked for. |
|
|
Audio Aficionado Sponsors | |