#1
|
|||
|
|||
Comparing digital files/sources to each other and to vinyl...
It`d be great to hear your thoughts on this. What are your findings when comparing
streaming (f.e. Tidal) in CD Quality streaming (f.e. Tidal) in MQA Quality streaming ripped CDs as FLAC from an external drive playings CDs directly from CDP/CDT and finally playing Vinyl from your analog deck. I have been busy diving into the whole streaming business and I have done a lot of comparing (I think I have posted enough of my findings on the other threads) - but of course I dived into the whole subject with prejudice (as I am a fan of physical media and I love my collection). It would be great to hear other peoples thoughts/findings on this. Are they all pretty much up paar, do you prefer one or the other, does one stand out clearly? Just talking plain SQ - not the handling and practical advantages/disadvantages.
__________________
Christoph Last edited by jdandy; 06-17-2018 at 04:53 PM. Reason: correct typo in title |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I've found that sound quality in my system is pretty much equal when comparing playing CD's and streaming CD quality music from Tidal or Spotify. I feel these two options are the best in my system. I haven't tried streaming MQA files from Tidal so I can't comment on it. Streaming FLAC files from an external drive also produces results similar to physical CD's and the streaming services. Vinyl comes in last through my system. I've found all of these things to be component/system dependent and, of course, the source recording and file quality. As it's always been with audio, there are variables with every music source. But to me, the more viable sources the better.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I find Qobuz streaming sounds the same as Roon feeding ripped CDs to my Auralic Aries G2. I haven't played a CD in 10 years. I only have the Quobuz Sublime not the plus service.
I use a Yggdrasil A2 DAC and find it far superior to my Rega RP8 and the McIntosh phono pre on a good master. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Comparing digitale files/sources to each other and to vinyl...
I find streaming ripped CDs from NAS via network to my Linn streamers to be superior to CD. I gave up my disc player a few years ago. I still buy CDs, but rip them and put them in storage. I like physical media, but only really
I find vinyl better than, worse than, or equal to streaming - it just depends on the recording. For me it’s a moot point: I have a vinyl collection that sounds great and would be hard to replace, but also find that many new digital releases sound fantastic. A great 50s jazz recording mastered for vinyl sounds awesome, but so does a modern classical recording mastered in hi res. My listening choice will be driven by the recording, not the medium.
__________________
Tony D'Agostino Momentum S250 MxV & HD pre; Linn Klimax Organik DSM, SonicTransporter, EtherRegen; Acoustic Signature Typhoon Neo, Koetsu RSP, Boulder 1108; Sf Il Cremonese; Shunyata Everest, Altaira, Sigma & Alpha v2 Last edited by Antonmb; 06-13-2018 at 10:23 AM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
My list from best SQ to least best, depending on the recording is generally:
Vinyl (which I don't have anymore since I am a klutz and kept breaking styluses) SACD Downloaded HiRes music Tidal MQA Ripped CD's Tidal CD quality I listen to Tidal MQA most of the time for the sound quality and ease of use.
__________________
Paul Harbeth 40.3 XD, Sound Anchor stands w/ Stillpoints, Luxman M900 & C900, Aurender N20, Jay's Audio CDT3 - MK3 CD player, Mola Mola Tambaqui DAC, Shunyata Everest, Altaira |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Comparing digitale files/sources to each other and to vinyl...
I‘m starting to like the theory that it is really a question of which master was being used. The more I listen the more I find it difficult to make a general statement. Sometimes Vinyl, sometimes even CD, sometimes - I have to admit by now - MQA... maybe it really is comparing apples with pears when you don‘t know with source master/material was used...
__________________
Christoph Last edited by bruno2009; 06-13-2018 at 05:56 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Plus my vinyl collection probably does suck! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I just compared my Vinyl of the last „London Grammar“ to the MQA - I must admit - I do understand why one would prefer the MQA in this case.... it‘s really difficult to make a general statement... maybe ripping existing CDs to FLAC, getting Roon and integrating Tidal MQA is the way to go for digital - and only when there is a really great pressing on Vinyl with excellent mastering buy the Vinyl... I‘m really torn... I somehow don‘t like the thought of leaving physical media behind...
__________________
Christoph |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
- Buck
__________________
Library: Speakers: Avalon Acoustics Isis, Subwoofers: (2) REL Acoustics 212SE Amplification: D’agostino Momentum preamplifier, D’agostino S250 stereo amplifier Digital: dCS Rossini CD/SACD transport, dCS Rossini DAC/streamer/master clock. Analog: Brinkmann Taurus table, Lyra Etna Lambda, Audio Research Ref. Phono 3 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Comparing digitale files/sources to each other and to vinyl...
Quote:
Buck - nice to hear and it really is the only thing that makes sense and explains the ongoing differences between the sources from material to material (and thus why I‘m finding it difficult to make a general statement). Doesn’t make it easier though - would actually implicate that all three sources have their „moments“... so run all three? I like the Idea I posted above - rip existing CDs to FLAC, use Tidal for new releases (merge them by using Roon) and buy Vinyl when you‘re sure mastering and pressing are of excellent quality...
__________________
Christoph |
|
|
Audio Aficionado Sponsors | |