AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > AudioAficionado News > Member System Forum

Member System Forum System Pictures and Descriptions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #451  
Old 03-23-2017, 08:43 AM
Randy Myers Randy Myers is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Nipomo, CA
Posts: 2,142
Default

Thank you Michael. I am happy with the progress and where it has taken me. Obvious I am always limited by what I can afford and what is available to me at the time. I have been able to move forward with keeping with my main theme of little flash, industrial looks, performance first!
Reply With Quote
  #452  
Old 03-23-2017, 01:23 PM
chessman's Avatar
chessman chessman is offline
From the BAT cave ...
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 11,697
Default

Randy, I bet that your pure class A amp feeding your passive preamp is going to be your long term keeper. In golf we drive for show, but putt for dough. In audio we brag about power, but we mostly listen to that first amp. Congrats!
Reply With Quote
  #453  
Old 03-23-2017, 08:37 PM
Randy Myers Randy Myers is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Nipomo, CA
Posts: 2,142
Default

Thank you sir. I agree, power is just a number and the First Watt is simply amazing. I actual just got back from visiting EJ and getting a set of his C2 cables to feed it! The problem with these new metal racks is they are hard to get behind for wiring
Reply With Quote
  #454  
Old 03-24-2017, 02:54 AM
2fastdriving 2fastdriving is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,772
Default

You need tube preamp. Ima stop here . Stop tickling the edges. Randy, go in all the way
Reply With Quote
  #455  
Old 03-24-2017, 09:25 AM
Randy Myers Randy Myers is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Nipomo, CA
Posts: 2,142
Default

Hehe... you are a funny guy Marc ... How many outputs do the ARC have? I currently have 1x XLR (to ARC amp) and 2x RCA (to the subs and the First Watt) in use right now with 1x XLR still unused on my STP-SE.
Reply With Quote
  #456  
Old 03-24-2017, 04:47 PM
2fastdriving 2fastdriving is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,772
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy Myers View Post
Hehe... you are a funny guy Marc ... How many outputs do the ARC have? I currently have 1x XLR (to ARC amp) and 2x RCA (to the subs and the First Watt) in use right now with 1x XLR still unused on my STP-SE.
I believe they have 3 outputs, in both SE and balanced.
Reply With Quote
  #457  
Old 03-24-2017, 11:32 PM
Randy Myers Randy Myers is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Nipomo, CA
Posts: 2,142
Default

Very cool... so at least they would work going forward... down the road if I decide to look at one ....
Reply With Quote
  #458  
Old 03-25-2017, 01:03 AM
JMD JMD is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Florida Panhandle
Posts: 421
Default

Randy

I think you are good for now with the STP-SE and might be better served by upgrading it rather than buying a 6H30 based preamp. If you want a classic tube sound there are other options. Just my opinion and others are surely different.
Reply With Quote
  #459  
Old 03-25-2017, 01:28 AM
Randy Myers Randy Myers is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Nipomo, CA
Posts: 2,142
Default

Thank you... yea I am cut off from buying anything right now... but next on list might be a new W4S DAC ...
Reply With Quote
  #460  
Old 03-25-2017, 11:21 AM
Randy Myers Randy Myers is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Nipomo, CA
Posts: 2,142
Default

A couple friends from our audio club were over yesterday comparing the First Watt and Audio Research amplifiers. Well one preferred the FW and the other the ARC. I am neutral although maybe leaning towards the FW. The one who liked the ARC better is an Audio Research fan/owner from way back, so his heart was with ARC from the get go... and he really liked the VT50.

We all came to a definitely consensuses however that they are both pretty spectacular and fairly close. The ARC may have a little more "air" around it, especially in the highs while the FW probably has a fuller mid range and female vocals especially are startling good. Mid base very much favored the FW. Especially on a Fiona Joy SACD where the lower piano notes just had a more solid bottom residence. And the FW has probably a better and more stable image. Both are extremely good in this regards.

The ARC definitely has more power, but both are able to drive my MC's (which should be a very hard to drive speaker, 85 db, 4 ohm) to very high levels. Honestly, it is a really good problem to have, and a very nice change of pace in amplifiers...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:17 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video