AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > VPI Industries

VPI Industries Turntables Made in USA

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-20-2014, 12:54 PM
gerzom's Avatar
gerzom gerzom is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 338
Default VPI Scout vs Classic 1 (possible upgrade?)

Hi, after living with my Scout for the last 4 months and loving every minute of it, the upgrade bug reared its ugly head again.

I'm wondering if it would be a big improvement when moving from my Scout (early model with acrylic platter) to a new Classic 1. If so what would be the areas that would mostly improve?
Im using a Dynavector DV 20x2L cartridge and an Electrocompaniet ECP-1 phono amp that would stay in place.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-27-2014, 09:11 AM
miketuason's Avatar
miketuason miketuason is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cerritos, CA
Posts: 685
Default

Hi Gert, I too have the VPI Scout for about a year now with Lyra cartridge and loving every moment of it. It's too bad, I was just in Amsterdam last week for four days I could have listen to your system. I also bought lots of record at Concerto in Amsterdam. They have lots of good audiophile record as well.
__________________
McIntosh C2300 preamp, MC601 monoblocks (x2), Vandersteen 2CE Signature II Speakers, Marantz AV8802a preamp processor, Marantz MA500 monoblocks amps, Small Audio Manufacture (SAM) Turntable, Polk Audio Center, Rear Left and Rear Right speakers, SVS Front High Left and Front High Right speakers, Chrysalis Bass Matrix-12 Sub woofer.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-03-2014, 12:58 AM
beowulf's Avatar
beowulf beowulf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 394
Default

I would be interested in hearing impressions from VPI owners who have had or heard both as well.

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-03-2014, 04:40 AM
Good Times Good Times is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 155
Default

Owned both, I find with the same cart that I get lower background noise on the Classic, better control in the bass, and better resolution (separation improved too). Don't forget you get a better arm, not just a better table, and I think going from the acrylic to alum platter is a good move.

The other option I'd suggest would be to go 12" alum platter and the periphery ring.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-05-2014, 01:27 AM
beowulf's Avatar
beowulf beowulf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 394
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Good Times View Post
Owned both, I find with the same cart that I get lower background noise on the Classic, better control in the bass, and better resolution (separation improved too). Don't forget you get a better arm, not just a better table, and I think going from the acrylic to alum platter is a good move.

The other option I'd suggest would be to go 12" alum platter and the periphery ring.
Thank you for the comparisons and impressions of the 2 tables. I have a Rega RP6 now, but I think the Classic would be a solid and financially realistic step up from the Rega, so I hope to one day make a move in that direction.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-06-2014, 11:44 PM
sanji sanji is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 322
Default

The classic series is a significant upgrade from the Scout. Better sound staging & dynamics. Overall a better table.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-18-2014, 04:21 PM
Bavarian05's Avatar
Bavarian05 Bavarian05 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanji View Post
The classic series is a significant upgrade from the Scout. Better sound staging & dynamics. Overall a better table.
I agree with this assessment. I have owned both and there is a significant upgrade from the Scout to Classic. Soundstage specificity and bass stability/definition come to mind most. Much more stable, realistic sound. Not that the Scout is poor in any of these areas, just that the Classic is a large jump up. The other thing to note (at least in my experience) is that the Classic is much easier to place. The Scout and my most recent table prior to the Classic - the Clearaudio Concept, were very susceptible to room feedback. The Classic seems to be designed with a much, much greater mass and also better isolation feet so as to make placement much easier and a lot less tweaky.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:42 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video