AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Turntables & Vinyl > Turntables & Tonearms

Turntables & Tonearms Where Analog still Rules

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 02-12-2020, 10:26 PM
1KW 1KW is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Naples, Fl & Long Beach Island, NJ
Posts: 7,634
Default

[QUOTE=Mouse;943443]Can an audiophile digital system compete in sound quality with an audiophile vinyl system? Short answer YES
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 02-12-2020, 11:33 PM
Mouse Mouse is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Music City
Posts: 581
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W9TR View Post
Whatever happened to the OP? Haven’t heard from Mouse for awhile.
I still haven't bought my turntable. I keep bouncing around all over the country, I always tell myself I'll buy a nice turntable when I find a city to stick around in for good. After a few years I'm still moving all over.

I'm back looking at turntables again. I'm considering dr feikert's blackird, MT10, or something from VPI like a loaded scout or a basic avenger. After several listening examples, vinyl sounds more lifelike yet more relaxing to the ear at the same time. The problem with demoing turntables, is that the stores never have two turntables on one rig, I go from room to room, or store to store.

I've done comparisons on boulder, ARC, Mcintosh, and moon.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 05-10-2020, 11:58 AM
blacsno's Avatar
blacsno blacsno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Farmington, Mich
Posts: 678
Default

How bout this for a answer....... In 2003 I spent 3K+ ish on updating my LP12. It took the Mcintosh MDA1000 at 8K in 2005 to get approx 95% of the capability of that LP12 mod!! Here is the funny part NO MATTER much more money I put into the LP12. The MDA1000 will always lag behind by the SAME percent!!! The human ear is engineered as an ANALOG device. Digital by its own process definition is an approximation. I still continue to smile at the thought that some people think digital means equal to analog.
__________________
McIntosh C2300:Gold Lions 12AX7, McIntosh MC452, McIntosh D1100 , Bryston bdp-3, McIntosh MEN220
Linn Sondek 25th LP-12 upgraded, Encounter MK-3, Lyra Delos, Wegne Plinth, Ultra Origin DC motor, Cetech Subchassis
Sonus Faber Cremona, (2) JL Audio F110 subs, Squeeze Server v7.9 Windows 2012 Server 25TB, Audio Metallurgy GA-0 XLR & RCA, Wireworld Silver Eclipse speaker cable, PS Audio Power Plant Premier (2), WireWorld Silver Power Cables, Tascam DA3000
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 05-10-2020, 12:23 PM
Still-One Still-One is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Milford, MI
Posts: 32,465
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blacsno View Post
How bout this for a answer....... In 2003 I spent 3K+ ish on updating my LP12. It took the Mcintosh MDA1000 at 8K in 2005 to get approx 95% of the capability of that LP12 mod!! Here is the funny part NO MATTER much more money I put into the LP12. The MDA1000 will always lag behind by the SAME percent!!! The human ear is engineered as an ANALOG device. Digital by its own process definition is an approximation. I still continue to smile at the thought that some people think digital means equal to analog.
Disagree completely.When someone says something sounds analog I think "Oh No".
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 05-10-2020, 12:30 PM
McMusicman's Avatar
McMusicman McMusicman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 18
Default


Last edited by McMusicman; 05-10-2020 at 12:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 05-10-2020, 01:39 PM
blacsno's Avatar
blacsno blacsno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Farmington, Mich
Posts: 678
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Still-One View Post
Disagree completely.When someone says something sounds analog I think "Oh No".
Okay....... But please tell me when you where physically altered with digital ears without a DIGITAL to ANALOG converter?
__________________
McIntosh C2300:Gold Lions 12AX7, McIntosh MC452, McIntosh D1100 , Bryston bdp-3, McIntosh MEN220
Linn Sondek 25th LP-12 upgraded, Encounter MK-3, Lyra Delos, Wegne Plinth, Ultra Origin DC motor, Cetech Subchassis
Sonus Faber Cremona, (2) JL Audio F110 subs, Squeeze Server v7.9 Windows 2012 Server 25TB, Audio Metallurgy GA-0 XLR & RCA, Wireworld Silver Eclipse speaker cable, PS Audio Power Plant Premier (2), WireWorld Silver Power Cables, Tascam DA3000
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 05-10-2020, 01:40 PM
blacsno's Avatar
blacsno blacsno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Farmington, Mich
Posts: 678
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McMusicman View Post
SWEET!!! That is SOOOOOOO flipping funny!!
__________________
McIntosh C2300:Gold Lions 12AX7, McIntosh MC452, McIntosh D1100 , Bryston bdp-3, McIntosh MEN220
Linn Sondek 25th LP-12 upgraded, Encounter MK-3, Lyra Delos, Wegne Plinth, Ultra Origin DC motor, Cetech Subchassis
Sonus Faber Cremona, (2) JL Audio F110 subs, Squeeze Server v7.9 Windows 2012 Server 25TB, Audio Metallurgy GA-0 XLR & RCA, Wireworld Silver Eclipse speaker cable, PS Audio Power Plant Premier (2), WireWorld Silver Power Cables, Tascam DA3000
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 05-10-2020, 03:53 PM
Antonmb's Avatar
Antonmb Antonmb is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Northwest Washington (Mt Baker foothills)
Posts: 9,129
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blacsno View Post
Okay....... But please tell me when you where physically altered with digital ears without a DIGITAL to ANALOG converter?


I don’t believe, with today’s technology, that either format is inherently better - a personal opinion of course, not a statement of fact - but I think the idea that analog is better because our ears are analog is what’s called an association fallacy: because A is true and B is true, A must equal B - or something like that.

Here’s another side of the same coin: digital is nothing more than analog data with discrete intervals - a model. Our ears are analog, but the inner ear converts sound to electrical impulses - analog data with discrete intervals - and sends them to the brain for interpretation, so maybe the whole hearing process is analog to digital. But that’s no more relevant than the argument that our ears are analog.

De gustibus non est disputandum - there’s no arguing with taste, or as my father used to translate it, “you can’t argue with Gus.”
__________________
Tony
D'Agostino Momentum S250 MxV & HD pre; Linn Klimax Organik DSM, SonicTransporter, EtherRegen; Acoustic Signature Typhoon Neo, Koetsu RSP, Boulder 1108; Sf Il Cremonese; Shunyata Everest, Altaira, Sigma & Alpha v2
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 05-10-2020, 05:04 PM
SCAudiophile SCAudiophile is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 4,531
Default

For many years I thought "No".

As an aside, it is actually a red herring question as we don't listen directly to digital, ever, anyway. We are listening to the result of whatever D->A is in the chain and many other things!

After many years and advances in technology, cables, etc...my answer is now...

YES with a top line CD, SACD, XRCD playback system, transport, dac, masterclock, matching cables, powercord, etc...

Before y'all jump on this,...

Remember that we all tried the same types of things to get great vinyl playback...then it is cartridges, MM or MC, tonearm, lead wires, plinths, motors, drive type, power supplies, suspension/isolation, phono preamp, synergy the chain of play, gain matching, cables, power cords, vinyl, weight, color/composition and purity, what speed is best,78, 33, 45, which is better. etc....and so on and so forth. 5 TTs under my belt in years past I can tell you its pretty much "same @#$& different playback medium..." IMHO. [emoji2]

Many will disagree I am sure.

*If vinyl was always better, no matter what, it would not matter what kind of vinyl you bought and how you played it back. We know that is far from true.

I love vinyl playback, RTR too, and tubes while we are at it...have heard great systems of all types,..what matters most is quality of media, mastering chain and level of execution of the system and ultimately that you Enjoy The Music!!!

Again,...only my opinion.

The statement that our ears take in analog info is absolutely but I believe or brain is not pure analog as it processes electrical impusles received from our hearing system and interprets the sound. Is thr brain digital, no,...is it pure analog, definitely no as well.

And lastly...

“There*is a principle which is a*bar against all*information, which is proof*against all*arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance - that principle is contempt prior to investigation.”

Last edited by SCAudiophile; 05-10-2020 at 06:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 05-10-2020, 05:09 PM
Antonmb's Avatar
Antonmb Antonmb is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Northwest Washington (Mt Baker foothills)
Posts: 9,129
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCAudiophile View Post
For many years I thought "No".

As an aside, it is actually a red herring question as we don't listen directly to digital, ever, anyway. We are listening to the result of whatever D->A is in the chain and many other things!

After many years and advances in technology, cables, etc...my answer is now...

YES with a top line CD, SACD, XRCD playback system, transport, dac, masterclock, matching cables, powercord, etc...

Before y'all jump on this,...

Remember that we all tried the same types of things to get great vinyl playback...then it is cartridges, MM or MC, tonearm, lead wires, plinths, motors, drive type, power supplies, suspension/isolation, phono preamp, synergy the chain of play, gain matching, cables, power cords, vinyl, weight, color, 78, 33, 45, which is better. etc....and so on and so forth. 5 TTs under my belt in years past I can tell you its pretty much "same @#$& different playback medium..." IMHO. [emoji2]

Many will disagree I am sure.

*If vinyl was always better, would not matter what kind of vinyl you bought and how you played it back. We know that is far from ture.

I love vinyl playback, RTR too, and tubes while we are at it...have heard great systems of all types,..what matters most is quality of media, mastering chain and level of execution of the system and ultimately that you Enjoy The Music!!!

Again,...only my opinion.

And lastly...

“There*is a principle which is a*bar against all*information, which is proof*against all*arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance - that principle is contempt prior to investigation.”

Well said.
__________________
Tony
D'Agostino Momentum S250 MxV & HD pre; Linn Klimax Organik DSM, SonicTransporter, EtherRegen; Acoustic Signature Typhoon Neo, Koetsu RSP, Boulder 1108; Sf Il Cremonese; Shunyata Everest, Altaira, Sigma & Alpha v2
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:31 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video