#431
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
|
#432
|
|||
|
|||
Krell told a recent buyer of the S1200 ("new guy" on this forum) that the S1200 was still superior SQ-wise to the Foundation. Can't wait to read about the Foundation to see how it stacks up, but the S1200 still seems like a strong competitor in the 10k range. In addition to good SQ, the S1200 provides fairly robust manual EQ (although indecipherable to a layman like me) and a simple yet useful remote with on-the-fly quick adjustments for things like speaker levels (something I'm sorely missing with my new av8801, where Audyssey set my side surrounds too high, and certain recordings/movies are just too hot in the surrounds).
Would be very curious to hear comparison of S1200 vs SP3, but doubt that will happen, as the S1200 just doesnt have the distribution of the SP3, Classe SSP800, Mac MX150. I would have jumped on the SP3 and called it a day if it had any EQ ability, even just defeatable tone controls (Harmon/JBL version will be priced way out of my range ). SP3 is still tempting though, given all the great reviews, and given I'm not overly thrilled with the SQ of the AV8801 as an analog preamp or for mch music (superb for movies though).
__________________
Amps: McIntosh MC611’s Preamp/Processor: MX150 Sources: Esoteric K-01X, OPPO BDP95, Speakers: Canton Ref K3 |
#433
|
||||
|
||||
What about Anthem D2v?
|
#434
|
|||
|
|||
Lots of hdmi handshake problems and apparently not in same league as Bryston, Classe or Krell for 2 ch analog or mch SQ (again, solely based on significant web research on various forums). Preamp SQ for music is paramount if I go that high in price, as it will have to be an all-in-one solution. Right now, leaning toward keeping the relatively inexpensive av8801 and adding a good preamp with HT Bypass like the Classe CP800.
__________________
Amps: McIntosh MC611’s Preamp/Processor: MX150 Sources: Esoteric K-01X, OPPO BDP95, Speakers: Canton Ref K3 |
#435
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Did this ever get done? I tried the USB input on my recently delivered unit and had a number of issues using my Mac and Amarra software. USB input display says "PCM" in. I can't get my Mac to enable any options above 16bit / 48K. When I play 44K files, Amarra will process the music, but for my hi res music it kicks it back to iTunes. Missing something in the set up or do I need to hook up my Arye QB9 again and send analog stereo to the SP3? Last edited by BigHat; 02-04-2013 at 04:28 PM. |
#436
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Caveat-- I have a DSpeaker Anti-mode which does help the bass from about 80 Hz on down. Other than that no EQ. All of which is to say I consider the lack thereof to be an asset, not a deficit. Bryston chose SQ over features, and that's one reason I went with the SP3.
__________________
_______ Dave |
#437
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#438
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
james |
#439
|
|||
|
|||
"Possibly, it's been sent to the back burner as they've been working on those several newer products. "
******* That would be my guess. I was thinking a few days ago that a company with ~60 employees has "rolled out" over the past few months the BHA-1, DBA-2, BDP-2, and multiple combinations of passive and active speakers, in addition to rather rapid improvement of software. IMO, the speakers are a pretty ballsie move in uncertain times. So far, however, James et. al. seem to have the golden touch for moving Bryston out of it's previous comfort zones. Steve |
#440
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I'm also wondering that as the digital board is separate from the analog section, from what I know, would there ever be the possibility of offering an upgrade to my SP3 to the newer DAC circuits of the new DA? That would be great. Another question regards subs. We can utilize a second output for the subs, and so get two, but they are still a combined mono—not so great. I can't use the crossovers in the SP3 because of that, and have to do an external crossover, which I'd like to eliminate. As the sub signals must be derived from the stereo bass in the first place, isn't there some way to have a firmware upgrade that would allow separate channels for the bass? From my own days recording with the Boston Sym. And London, I found that bass does have a pronounced improvement when subs are derived directly from their proper channels rather than being combined, with what that does to the phase relationships, peaks and valleys of the output, etc. it's easily discernible in my room of 15.5' x 33 '. |
|
|
Audio Aficionado Sponsors | |