#1
|
|||
|
|||
Q7 vs.... The Montis
more details tomorrow
Last edited by TOGA; 06-05-2014 at 02:11 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Looking forward to your thoughts on this interesting comparison!
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I think I know what the "winner" is, but it would be interesting to hear more about what the differences are.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
The Q7 completely dwarfs the Montis. I never realised how big they are. Are you thinking of changing or just adding more speakers to the stable ? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I think those are his surrounds. Nobody would replace Q7's with Montis. The price difference is 20x.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I look forward to hearing about the comparison …….. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
+ 1. The law of diminishing returns applies perhaps even more so to Ultra high end gear. To get that last 5-10% costs exponentially more. The current ML series are really nice. Looking forward to the comparo also
Last edited by Bodhisattva; 02-14-2014 at 07:30 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I'm not saying they are 20x as good, i've never heard Q7's in my life. My comment was only this: Nobody buys something costing as much as a Q7, then decides to replace it with something costing as much as a Montis.
It would be like replacing a Ferrari with a prius. They both do a great job getting you where you need to go, and the prius actually does some things better: its more efficient and cheaper. But it's not a Ferrari. If you sell your Ferrari, it's usually not to buy a prius, it's to buy a newer/faster Ferrari I agree that the law of diminishing returns is in play when you compare two items which are so far apart in price. But unlike $$ figures, you can't quantify "twice as good" or "20 times as good" with your ears. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
This is where toga quips "that's what she said"
|
|
|
Audio Aficionado Sponsors | |