AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > McIntosh Audio

McIntosh Audio A Tradition of Excellence

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 04-30-2009, 06:20 PM
1KW 1KW is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Naples, Fl & Long Beach Island, NJ
Posts: 7,634
Default

Ok, now for my initial impressions. I have been listening for about only 1 hour so the first thought is that the MC501's sound different then the MC252. The MC252 is a fantastic amp. and different does not mean necessarily better always, but in this case the MC501's sounds better in certain respects and in other respects it may take some getting used to. The reason I have to get used to the MC501's is that they have a very punchy bass, not bloated or flabby but impossible to ignore. I used to have the bass on my C220 turned up to 2 o'clock, now I have the bass either bypassed or even turned down a little bit. Once you accept the powerful bass the next observation is the sound stage . As with the MC252 the stereo imaging is very impressive, however I will go so far as to say my system sounds like I changed more than just the amp. The sound stage is more 3 dimensional. The sound stage with the MC252 was more 2 dimensional ie left/right/top/bottom. When I say 3 dimensional the sound stage extends to left/top,left/bottom,left/side, right/top,right/bottom/right/side and front/back/left/right. As for detail or resolution the MC501's do not disappoint but are still warm sounding and I have to say the MC252 is the same flavor in this department. I am not quite sure I am a fan of the bass at this point as some music is a bit hard to listen to; this may be due to my room. I notice the background is just as quiet as the MC252 was. So do I need to eat crow..... ? I will say that if you asked me a few days ago if I would hear a major difference my answer would be .. NO. Are a pair of the MC501's worth more than double the price of a MC252? To answer this I have to let the amps. break in a little, give me some more time listening. I can say this, if I were able to get my money back on these MC501's and get my MC252 back I would not do it. These MC501's are staying put for longer than the year the MC252 lived with me. Thanks for putting up with my stubborn skeptical posts. Who know's I might even try some cables next.

Last edited by 1KW; 04-30-2009 at 06:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:04 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video