View Single Post
  #1  
Old 08-10-2020, 01:31 PM
Charles Charles is offline
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,248
Default When does Science Become Science Fiction?

Science becomes science fiction when:

1) It states the DNA Code is the product of random chance. Life cannot exist without the DNA Code. Do you disagree?

2) States we will establish a base on the moon.

3) It maintains we will land human beings on Mars. Because of its thin atmosphere, even landing on Mars is next to impossible. Also, what's the point of landing on Mars?

4) It states humanity will ever encounter ET. The Universe is much larger than first thought. It is infinite. In the observable universe (92 billion light years across) there are a trillion trillion galaxies. Each of them may contain a half trillion stars and planets. This fact makes encountering ET impossible or so improbable as to be a waste of time. Spending billions building ever larger telescopes in an attempt to accomplish the impossible is a monumental waste of time and money.

5) It thinks it's going to discover a "new physics". Building ever larger super colliders is a monumental waste of time and money.

When is the madness going to stop? We are on our own. ET is not going to come to our rescue. For whatever reason we are not the product of random chance. We should admit that and that in the distant past we been poisoned and thus our genome is severely malfunctioning and that our genome needs repairing. Humanity should band together to save our planet and ourselves. It's the only one we have or ever will have. Our oceans are full of plastic and plutonium. The atmosphere is becoming increasing polluted by fossil fuels. It is warming at an alarming rate. The earth is contaminated with horrible waste and this waste is seeping into our oceans.

Science needs to be refocused on the areas and subjects that can help us. We don't have a blank check. We needs cures, not endless expensive treatments. We need a healthy planet.

Treating the diseases caused by mutation and aging is an incorrect wasteful approach to disease.

MUTATION should be considered a disease and primarily treated AS A DISEASE.

Likewise AGING.

Last edited by Charles; 08-10-2020 at 01:34 PM.
Reply With Quote