View Single Post
  #15  
Old 11-14-2016, 04:51 AM
jpgr4blu jpgr4blu is online now
Member

 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: new york city
Posts: 548
Default

Hi Lost Bears:
The difference between the Ref 150 and the Ref 110 is about as big as the difference between the Ref 3 and the Ref 5SE. It is that big. Richer, more palpable images with fuller lower midrange and more defined and deeper bass. It sounds more natural than the Ref 110 which can sound a bit thin at times.
The difference between the Ref 150 and Ref 150 SE adds a little bit to the above equation----but not nearly the difference between the Ref 3 and Ref 5SE.
That was a sea change and all for the better.
This is all IMHO.
__________________
Wilson Alexia V, ARC Ref 160M MkII,Ref 40,Ref Phono2SE, Shunyata Triton3, Typhon, Sigma PCs, ICs & SCs, Spectral SDR4000SV (w MIT IC), Belcanto PL1, Oppo 205, Marantz 2270 (tuner only):AudioDesk and VPI record cleaners, Furutech Demag & Destat; Stillpoint Apertures, TechDas AF 3S Premium with SAT CF9 and Kuzma 4pt 9" arms, Lyra Atlas Lambda SL, Dynavector XV1-t stereo and XV1-s mono carts, Miyajima mono, Shure V15VxMR,
Reply With Quote