Quote:
Originally Posted by RaceCarDriver
|
This is a bit flawed comparison in my opinion. The Wild cables were shotgun, whereas the the new cables have two separate cables for the upper and bass. I imagine they were bi-amped.
The price book actually shows the Zeros to be 10.5 awg vs 9 awg for the older line. Seems like the new cables have really been design for the two cable use, would be awesome to get a perspective on the Zero only vs. older line of cables.
My MLs are not bi-wire capable which is a bummer since my amp can bi-amp and even tri-amp. Seems like an pretty great solution for bi-wire capable speakers. Albeit very expensive.
Edit: Just noticed they are bi-wiring and only showing the Wild’s amp end so they could be bi-wiring all three. Though I pretty awesome to have two separate cables for top end and bass. Wonder if they connected two wild’s together or Wild+Redwood/Oak cables for bass how they would compare.