View Single Post
  #12  
Old 12-27-2012, 04:23 PM
allen_bh allen_bh is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cincy2 View Post
Some background first: I replaced my dCS Paganini transport and DAC with a dCS Vivaldi DAC only. I've cut the "physical media" cord and don't intend to look back. Before the switch, I was using a Mac Mini server running Pure Music's software engine to feed the USB port on the Pag Upsampler. I upsampled to DSD and sent that to the DAC via a Firewire interface. From the DAC I ran straight to my monoblocks without a pre amp. The sound I got from this set up was phenomenal. Never being one to leave good enough alone, I had to do something with the unused transport. When dCS announced the Vivaldi line back in August, the path became clear. I traded the Paganini transport and DAC for the Vivaldi DAC and patiently waited.

The first thing you notice about the Vivaldi DAC is the size and weight. It's a full 35 lbs and too big to fit in a standard rack shelf. Fortunately, my Adona rack has adjustable shelves. The fit and finish of the unit are what you would expect from dCS - flawless. I got the black version to complement the rest of my system electronics.

Connections: This was a little bit of a conundrum. dCS has abandoned the Firewire interface on the Vivaldi line for reasons unknown. This was the only way to get a pure DSD signal out of the Pag Upsampler. Consequently, I can't send a DSD output to the Vivaldi DAC. Instead I used the dual AES mode and sent the current maximum 24/192 resolution through a set of balanced interconnects to the DAC. I believe there is a software update for the Pag Upsampler coming that will increase the available sample rate that you can output. I will wait for that anxiously.

The set up menu's on the Vivaldi are simple and easily navigated. The display is a high resolution color LCD. This is a nice improvement for these old eyes over the Paganini displays. We had everything connected and ready to go in about 15 minutes.

Another note: The Vivaldi has multiple clock inputs that will let you send both 44kHz and 48.1Khz clocks separately if your sources are clocked differently. My Puccini clock can send either via the same connection and since I have only one source, this is nice to have but not required.

OK. Now for the sound. There are some variables I couldn't control in the comparison of Pag to Vivaldi. I was unprepared for the change from Firewire to AES (shame on me) so I had to use the pair of interconnects provided by dCS with the DAC. The sample rate is also different from my previous configuration (DSD to 24/192). With all this in mind, I cued up a sampler file from Blue Coast that is one of my reference recordings, held my breath and pushed Play. No burn in.

Two promising discoveries. The vocals have a weight and presence that bests the Paganini noticeably. Also the magical detail that was present at louder volumes with the Pag stack was now there at much quieter levels. The shimmer on cymbals for example lasted much longer into the decay than on my previous set up. These are both improvements to celebrate. I will update the post as the days go on. My Paganini stack took about 20 hours to fully develop. I also want to try the straight feed from Mac Mini to DAC USB without any upsampling. One of our fellow posters is interested in that configuration. I will have some time to play next weekend.

Pics attached. Merry Christmas to all!

Cincy
Cincy,

Congrats on your Vivaldi and thank you for the nice write-up. Did you find problems with the width or the height (or lenth)? The published specs of the Vivaldi say it's 444mm/17.5" x 435mm/17.2" x 151mm/6.0" high. I assume these mean it's 17.5" Wide, 17.2" deep, and 6" tall (or height between shelves on your rack).

I heard the Vivaldi DAC directly driven from a Mac book pro with Audirvana at a Wilson event. Peter McGrath sure liked the Vivaldi and the playback app a lot - and from what I heard he has every reason to. Beautiful sounding. FWIW, he was running it straight via USB 2.0 without an up-sampler. Not sure that's what he does at home, perhaps it's a bit complicated to take more gear like an up-sampler, etc. "on the road".

Looking forward to reading your thoughts as it breaks in further.
Reply With Quote