View Single Post
  #7  
Old 01-18-2012, 07:01 AM
karsajid's Avatar
karsajid karsajid is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 92
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by larevoj View Post
Not going to do a review since SE has 0 hours versus non-SE at 550 hours and ARC recommends 600 hours of run-in time. Initial and immediate impression is a little faster, more dynamic, firm low, and airy highs. On aesthetic it looks sleeker with round front buttons which actually matches very well with my Bryston round buttons. Still I am kind of old fashion and prefers the retro squarish plastic buttons. The top cover now is acrylic as standard and metal top for special order - some in other forum commented acrylic sounds better. If anything it does helps the tubes glow brighter in the night!

Overall impression is a positive one.
Nice to know your first impression is positive

Is the gain structure similar? Does it sound more dynamic at lower volume levels than the Ref5?
Reply With Quote