Thread: MQA Discussion
View Single Post
  #422  
Old 04-11-2017, 10:16 AM
clpetersen clpetersen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,074
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmarin View Post

.....
(comment re: Jim Lesurf's article)...
It provides a clear explanation of the type of artifacts that are created when the so called MQA "folding" and "unfolding" is applied to the original file.

As mentioned in the article, it is a subjective cure that may or may not be preferred by a given listener.

For my part, I was able to experiment with a high end MQA DAC for an extended period of time.......
cmarin - if there is any system out there should should be able to discern the MQA difference, yours should be it. Impressive to say the least.

Trying to understand MQA by reading their patents is risky endeavor (Jim Luserf's excellent article, and similar). Meridian should allow expert dissemination of their approach. Either they are onto something or not. Their patent has issued (see below) so they have protection.


US Patent 9,548,055 "Doubly compatible lossless audio bandwidth extension"
issued January 2017 to Peter Craven of Meridian.
__________________
Main - Roon on Synology/Sonos Port/SoTM Neo endpoints; Chord Qutest, Bryston BP-17 cubed with phono option; EAT C-sharp with Ortofon Bronze MM, Bryston cubed Amplifier; Revel F126Be on custom Atocha stands; interconnects by WireWorld, furniture by Atocha Design 'Phones Audeze LCD-3, Bryston BHA-1; Office: Sonos/Roon; OPPO HA-1, Naim NAP100 and PSB Mini-C. Media Room:, Samsung QLED QN90 series, Sonos, OPPO 205, ATI N-core driving KEF LS-50's with REL subs; furniture by Glassisimo; Kids - U-turn for vinyl, Sonos Play5; Summer Shack - Sonos, vintage Pioneer, Dynaudio Special 40's.

Last edited by clpetersen; 04-14-2017 at 10:35 PM.
Reply With Quote